\
  The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
BackRefresh Options Favorite

1 in 1000 chance of nuclear war this year?

High or low?
plum azn
  04/19/22
low
Metal philosopher-king
  04/19/22
...
plum azn
  04/19/22
...
,.,.,.,.,.,.,.,.,.,...,.,,;..,
  12/26/24
C’mon bro it’s much higher than that
stubborn knife french chef
  04/19/22
What would you put it at?
plum azn
  04/19/22
Given current events I think the use of a tactical nuke in E...
stubborn knife french chef
  04/19/22
At the very least 2 nukes would be used. Both sides.
plum azn
  04/19/22
...
Abusive insanely creepy dilemma cuckoldry
  04/19/22
I’m not a nuclear war theory masterman but I’m n...
stubborn knife french chef
  04/19/22
It would very likely start the Big One I don't remember wha...
Diverse demanding pisswyrm
  04/19/22
I was assuming it would be a Russian first strike in Ukraine...
stubborn knife french chef
  04/20/22
There is no US policy. Though it is likely that the US will ...
plum azn
  04/20/22
Our leaders are indeed insane.
stubborn knife french chef
  04/20/22
1. NATO sends large numbers of troops to Ukraine. 2. Russia ...
plum azn
  04/20/22
It was a little over 50 years between WWII and the Berlin Wa...
Vivacious Chest-beating Messiness Space
  04/20/22
what will this do to my stocks!?
self-centered address
  04/19/22
That's on the lower end unfortunately We're not quite at Cu...
Diverse demanding pisswyrm
  04/19/22
What's your estimate?
plum azn
  04/20/22
I don't have one atm and would prefer not to have to think a...
Diverse demanding pisswyrm
  04/20/22
Ratchet and Clank taught me how dope tactical nukes are
Alcoholic stag film mexican
  04/20/22
Major points?
plum azn
  04/20/22
same but MW2 also nigger
very tactful gay wizard
  04/20/22
Is the use of one tactical nuke enough to make it a nuclear ...
Submissive racy newt
  04/20/22
Yes. At least one tactical nuke = nuclear war for this threa...
plum azn
  04/20/22
In that case it's 1/3 or 1/2.
Submissive racy newt
  04/20/22
33% chance of nuclear war is pretty bad. If that's true ther...
plum azn
  04/20/22
There's 100-150K men fighting like 20 miles away from the Ru...
Submissive racy newt
  04/20/22
I think they will consider the fact that using a tactical nu...
Cruel-hearted narrow-minded pocket flask
  04/20/22
Would that be worth it if it meant even one US city is destr...
plum azn
  04/20/22
yeah
Cruel-hearted narrow-minded pocket flask
  04/20/22
Russia hits Polish base with tactical nuke to stop NATO coun...
plum azn
  04/20/22
I think if Russia used a nuke in any circumstance we'd immed...
Cruel-hearted narrow-minded pocket flask
  04/20/22
That's impossible to imagine as the first response because a...
plum azn
  04/20/22
I'm not sure we can still assume your premise is true
Cruel-hearted narrow-minded pocket flask
  04/20/22
That's not a real response. No one is simply going to assume...
plum azn
  04/20/22
Maybe US intelligence doesn't have to "assume"
Cruel-hearted narrow-minded pocket flask
  04/20/22
Well this has gone in a pointless direction.
plum azn
  04/20/22
We'd respond in kind while frantically trying to deescalate....
Vivacious Chest-beating Messiness Space
  04/20/22
Nah man. They'd just use a MOAB type bomb. I think theirs is...
Vivacious Chest-beating Messiness Space
  04/20/22
1/1000 sounds about right The oligarchs won't let Putin u...
Cruel-hearted narrow-minded pocket flask
  04/20/22
They've been sidelined since the 2000s. In February you migh...
plum azn
  04/20/22
LJL they are why Putin is still in power. The fact is the...
Cruel-hearted narrow-minded pocket flask
  04/20/22
Putin did not seize their wealth for fear of consequences be...
plum azn
  04/20/22
50/50. either it will happen or it won't
Razzle swollen theatre
  04/20/22
(stats masterman)
stubborn knife french chef
  04/20/22
I'd say it's more like 1/200 this year, but 1/1000 is pretty...
Vivacious Chest-beating Messiness Space
  04/20/22


Poast new message in this thread



Reply Favorite

Date: April 19th, 2022 9:15 PM
Author: plum azn

High or low?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5088656&forum_id=2#44369893)



Reply Favorite

Date: April 19th, 2022 9:16 PM
Author: Metal philosopher-king

low

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5088656&forum_id=2#44369900)



Reply Favorite

Date: April 19th, 2022 9:19 PM
Author: plum azn



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5088656&forum_id=2#44369912)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 26th, 2024 5:38 PM
Author: ,.,.,.,.,.,.,.,.,.,...,.,,;..,




(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5088656&forum_id=2#48489409)



Reply Favorite

Date: April 19th, 2022 9:19 PM
Author: stubborn knife french chef

C’mon bro it’s much higher than that

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5088656&forum_id=2#44369910)



Reply Favorite

Date: April 19th, 2022 9:20 PM
Author: plum azn

What would you put it at?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5088656&forum_id=2#44369916)



Reply Favorite

Date: April 19th, 2022 9:22 PM
Author: stubborn knife french chef

Given current events I think the use of a tactical nuke in Eastern Europe this year is probably more like 1 in 20.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5088656&forum_id=2#44369922)



Reply Favorite

Date: April 19th, 2022 9:23 PM
Author: plum azn

At the very least 2 nukes would be used. Both sides.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5088656&forum_id=2#44369932)



Reply Favorite

Date: April 19th, 2022 9:23 PM
Author: Abusive insanely creepy dilemma cuckoldry



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5088656&forum_id=2#44369934)



Reply Favorite

Date: April 19th, 2022 9:31 PM
Author: stubborn knife french chef

I’m not a nuclear war theory masterman but I’m not sure if a tactical nuke implies the MAD doctrine.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5088656&forum_id=2#44369990)



Reply Favorite

Date: April 19th, 2022 9:45 PM
Author: Diverse demanding pisswyrm

It would very likely start the Big One

I don't remember what the US policy is for it but the Russians have stated that they would retaliate in kind for a strike like that

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5088656&forum_id=2#44370063)



Reply Favorite

Date: April 20th, 2022 8:03 AM
Author: stubborn knife french chef

I was assuming it would be a Russian first strike in Ukraine or Poland. They are the ones being painted into a corner rn.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5088656&forum_id=2#44371690)



Reply Favorite

Date: April 20th, 2022 12:36 PM
Author: plum azn

There is no US policy. Though it is likely that the US will retaliate with a nuclear strike on Belarus if Poland is hit with a nuclear strike. If the US stands down then every European country will abandon Ukraine and even urge Ukrainians to surrender. It's crazy but Washington is even willing to use a nuclear weapon just to preserve dominance in Europe.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5088656&forum_id=2#44372911)



Reply Favorite

Date: April 20th, 2022 1:10 PM
Author: stubborn knife french chef

Our leaders are indeed insane.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5088656&forum_id=2#44373103)



Reply Favorite

Date: April 20th, 2022 1:54 AM
Author: plum azn

1. NATO sends large numbers of troops to Ukraine. 2. Russia uses tactical nuke against Poland. 3. US uses tactical nuke against Belarus.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5088656&forum_id=2#44371160)



Reply Favorite

Date: April 20th, 2022 4:50 PM
Author: Vivacious Chest-beating Messiness Space

It was a little over 50 years between WWII and the Berlin Wall coming down, and things were a lot worse than this for much of it. I think it's at least 1/100, with only the Cuban missile crisis being in the neighborhood of 1/20.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5088656&forum_id=2#44374451)



Reply Favorite

Date: April 19th, 2022 9:46 PM
Author: self-centered address

what will this do to my stocks!?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5088656&forum_id=2#44370066)



Reply Favorite

Date: April 19th, 2022 9:52 PM
Author: Diverse demanding pisswyrm

That's on the lower end unfortunately

We're not quite at Cuban Missile Crisis levels with this yet but if we do keep at it we likely will get there and this time with no Dean Rusk to take the reigns from our senile POTUS

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5088656&forum_id=2#44370107)



Reply Favorite

Date: April 20th, 2022 12:37 PM
Author: plum azn

What's your estimate?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5088656&forum_id=2#44372912)



Reply Favorite

Date: April 20th, 2022 4:58 PM
Author: Diverse demanding pisswyrm

I don't have one atm and would prefer not to have to think about the long shadow that incompetent political blunders leading to all out genocidal war casts over our lives

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5088656&forum_id=2#44374489)



Reply Favorite

Date: April 20th, 2022 12:37 PM
Author: Alcoholic stag film mexican

Ratchet and Clank taught me how dope tactical nukes are

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5088656&forum_id=2#44372915)



Reply Favorite

Date: April 20th, 2022 12:39 PM
Author: plum azn

Major points?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5088656&forum_id=2#44372932)



Reply Favorite

Date: April 20th, 2022 12:47 PM
Author: very tactful gay wizard

same but MW2 also nigger

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5088656&forum_id=2#44372983)



Reply Favorite

Date: April 20th, 2022 12:38 PM
Author: Submissive racy newt

Is the use of one tactical nuke enough to make it a nuclear war?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5088656&forum_id=2#44372918)



Reply Favorite

Date: April 20th, 2022 12:40 PM
Author: plum azn

Yes. At least one tactical nuke = nuclear war for this thread.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5088656&forum_id=2#44372940)



Reply Favorite

Date: April 20th, 2022 12:53 PM
Author: Submissive racy newt

In that case it's 1/3 or 1/2.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5088656&forum_id=2#44373006)



Reply Favorite

Date: April 20th, 2022 1:08 PM
Author: plum azn

33% chance of nuclear war is pretty bad. If that's true there's like a 1% chance of a full exchange.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5088656&forum_id=2#44373093)



Reply Favorite

Date: April 20th, 2022 1:15 PM
Author: Submissive racy newt

There's 100-150K men fighting like 20 miles away from the Russian border. Russia has been exposed to be a paper tiger in front of the whole world, it has lost a lot of face/credibility. They are known to have an escalate to deescalate nuclear deterrence strategy, probably b/c they're a paper tiger. If the West/NATO is a little too giving with weapons/support and Ukraine hits back a little too hard, a tactical nuke is an appealing option Russia has in its arsenal to try to end this conflict before it spirals out of control.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5088656&forum_id=2#44373136)



Reply Favorite

Date: April 20th, 2022 1:23 PM
Author: Cruel-hearted narrow-minded pocket flask

I think they will consider the fact that using a tactical nuke likely leads to the obliteration of Russia.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5088656&forum_id=2#44373171)



Reply Favorite

Date: April 20th, 2022 1:24 PM
Author: plum azn

Would that be worth it if it meant even one US city is destroyed?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5088656&forum_id=2#44373182)



Reply Favorite

Date: April 20th, 2022 1:31 PM
Author: Cruel-hearted narrow-minded pocket flask

yeah

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5088656&forum_id=2#44373227)



Reply Favorite

Date: April 20th, 2022 1:23 PM
Author: plum azn

Russia hits Polish base with tactical nuke to stop NATO counterattack in Ukraine. US hits Belarus base with a tactical nuke. What happens next?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5088656&forum_id=2#44373175)



Reply Favorite

Date: April 20th, 2022 1:32 PM
Author: Cruel-hearted narrow-minded pocket flask

I think if Russia used a nuke in any circumstance we'd immediately flatten Moscow

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5088656&forum_id=2#44373238)



Reply Favorite

Date: April 20th, 2022 1:40 PM
Author: plum azn

That's impossible to imagine as the first response because a US city would get destroyed in retaliation. Washington would want to fight a nuclear war to maintain credibility and keep the nuclear war as limited as possible.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5088656&forum_id=2#44373281)



Reply Favorite

Date: April 20th, 2022 1:45 PM
Author: Cruel-hearted narrow-minded pocket flask

I'm not sure we can still assume your premise is true

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5088656&forum_id=2#44373302)



Reply Favorite

Date: April 20th, 2022 1:46 PM
Author: plum azn

That's not a real response. No one is simply going to assume the Russian nuclear arsenal doesn't work.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5088656&forum_id=2#44373313)



Reply Favorite

Date: April 20th, 2022 1:53 PM
Author: Cruel-hearted narrow-minded pocket flask

Maybe US intelligence doesn't have to "assume"

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5088656&forum_id=2#44373362)



Reply Favorite

Date: April 20th, 2022 1:56 PM
Author: plum azn

Well this has gone in a pointless direction.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5088656&forum_id=2#44373387)



Reply Favorite

Date: April 20th, 2022 4:57 PM
Author: Vivacious Chest-beating Messiness Space

We'd respond in kind while frantically trying to deescalate. No way would we flatten Moscow as our first response, especially when they have the ability to flatten DC

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5088656&forum_id=2#44374484)



Reply Favorite

Date: April 20th, 2022 4:53 PM
Author: Vivacious Chest-beating Messiness Space

Nah man. They'd just use a MOAB type bomb. I think theirs is Father of All Bombs, so I guess it's the FOAB. Using a tactical nuke rather than a FOAB is all downside, no upside.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5088656&forum_id=2#44374466)



Reply Favorite

Date: April 20th, 2022 12:49 PM
Author: Cruel-hearted narrow-minded pocket flask

1/1000 sounds about right

The oligarchs won't let Putin use a nuke

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5088656&forum_id=2#44372991)



Reply Favorite

Date: April 20th, 2022 1:12 PM
Author: plum azn

They've been sidelined since the 2000s. In February you might have said they wouldn't allow Putin to launch a full scale invasion.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5088656&forum_id=2#44373119)



Reply Favorite

Date: April 20th, 2022 1:21 PM
Author: Cruel-hearted narrow-minded pocket flask

LJL they are why Putin is still in power.

The fact is there are too many rich and powerful people in Russia that don't want their lavish lifestyles disrupted by something as needless as nuclear holocaust.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5088656&forum_id=2#44373166)



Reply Favorite

Date: April 20th, 2022 1:27 PM
Author: plum azn

Putin did not seize their wealth for fear of consequences because of strong backlash from the West but did confiscate the wealth of one of them who stepped out of line politically. He does not depend on them for power. Since the 2000s there has been an equilibrium with the oligarchs who were a Western creation of the 1990s before he took power.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5088656&forum_id=2#44373199)



Reply Favorite

Date: April 20th, 2022 1:11 PM
Author: Razzle swollen theatre

50/50. either it will happen or it won't

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5088656&forum_id=2#44373106)



Reply Favorite

Date: April 20th, 2022 1:12 PM
Author: stubborn knife french chef

(stats masterman)

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5088656&forum_id=2#44373118)



Reply Favorite

Date: April 20th, 2022 4:46 PM
Author: Vivacious Chest-beating Messiness Space

I'd say it's more like 1/200 this year, but 1/1000 is pretty reasonable too

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5088656&forum_id=2#44374428)