XO POLL: Moast Intelligent Human Being Known In Human Hi$tory?
| Jet Racy Water Buffalo | 07/04/25 | | Mahogany circlehead party of the first part | 07/04/25 | | twinkling voyeur | 07/04/25 | | magenta state idea he suggested | 07/04/25 | | Jet Racy Water Buffalo | 07/04/25 | | spectacular property | 07/04/25 | | Mahogany circlehead party of the first part | 07/04/25 | | spectacular property | 07/04/25 | | Mahogany circlehead party of the first part | 07/04/25 | | spectacular property | 07/04/25 | | Mahogany circlehead party of the first part | 07/05/25 | | Jet Racy Water Buffalo | 07/05/25 | | appetizing community account incel | 07/05/25 | | Jet Racy Water Buffalo | 07/06/25 | | appetizing community account incel | 07/05/25 | | Jet Racy Water Buffalo | 07/05/25 | | appetizing community account incel | 07/06/25 | | Supple embarrassed to the bone temple | 07/06/25 | | Hairraiser love of her life mexican | 07/05/25 | | Carnelian Irradiated Native | 07/06/25 | | Hairraiser love of her life mexican | 07/06/25 | | spectacular property | 07/06/25 | | Hairraiser love of her life mexican | 07/06/25 | | spectacular property | 07/06/25 | | Dashing Pit Rigor | 07/05/25 | | Saffron Exciting Goal In Life Mother | 07/06/25 | | mewling know-it-all cuckold | 07/05/25 | | rose sound barrier | 07/06/25 | | spectacular property | 07/06/25 | | contagious double fault | 07/06/25 | | spectacular property | 07/06/25 | | Zombie-like Apoplectic Whorehouse | 07/06/25 | | Jet Racy Water Buffalo | 07/06/25 | | Jet Racy Water Buffalo | 07/06/25 | | Jet Racy Water Buffalo | 07/06/25 | | Supple embarrassed to the bone temple | 07/06/25 | | Jet Racy Water Buffalo | 07/06/25 | | Carnelian Irradiated Native | 07/06/25 | | Jet Racy Water Buffalo | 07/06/25 | | contagious double fault | 07/06/25 | | Saffron Exciting Goal In Life Mother | 07/06/25 | | spectacular property | 07/06/25 | | Flatulent kitchen | 07/06/25 | | Carmine Histrionic Pisswyrm Theater | 07/06/25 | | mauve stock car | 07/06/25 | | Carmine Histrionic Pisswyrm Theater | 07/06/25 | | Orange mad cow disease | 07/06/25 | | Hairraiser love of her life mexican | 07/06/25 | | Transparent bull headed den yarmulke | 07/06/25 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: July 4th, 2025 6:09 PM Author: spectacular property
Past, I'm sticking with Feynman.
Present, my vote goes to Penrose.
We don't have sufficient information to speak to the majority of mankind, so it's really not a meaningful question.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5746210&forum_id=2#49072538) |
 |
Date: July 4th, 2025 6:24 PM Author: spectacular property
Can we really speak to ancient peoples? So little of their work and others' views of them is extant. Their popularity and contributions may be more a function of momentum than objective truths... just look at any old religious book.
I'd argue even the likes of Newton or Leibniz are too old to speak of in the same way as modern people.
I actually don't know much about Witten. I bet most scientists don't have Feynman's charisma & ability to communicate, though. (Just flip through anything Penrose has written.)
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5746210&forum_id=2#49072579) |
 |
Date: July 6th, 2025 4:33 PM Author: spectacular property
A lot of writings (and the history of people) have been lost over the past 2.5k years.
There were also great contributions from India & the far East in classical & medieval times that most of us aren't aware of. (How many of us could name the author of Al-Jabr, let alone read it?)
We can speak of those the knowledge of whom is extant, or has been translated into our native language, but not so much to the 'most intelligent person ever.'
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5746210&forum_id=2#49076775) |
 |
Date: July 6th, 2025 7:19 PM Author: spectacular property
Who's to say that the four contributors to QED won't go down as the most intelligent, influential people of the history of the world 2.5k years from now?
I would argue that the most influential individuals aren't necessarily the most intelligent. The further back in time we go, the more influential an individual becomes. Some kid in 2021 with a wacky GUT hasn't had 2.5k years to gain the infamy of a Plato.
Besides, could Plato even handle UG physics at CalTech today? (Conversely, could a CalTech grad today do what Plato did c. 500 BCE?)
Obviously, OP's question has no absolute answer, but it's still fun to argue.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5746210&forum_id=2#49077202) |
Date: July 6th, 2025 12:10 AM Author: rose sound barrier
I think it has to be Newton, for coming up with calculus + figuring out all the aspects of practical physics.
The only other contender is Einstein, who on 2 occasions figured out things in physics that don't make intuitive sense at all.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5746210&forum_id=2#49075462) |
Date: July 6th, 2025 7:26 AM Author: Supple embarrassed to the bone temple
Short list:
Tesla, Newton, Da Vinci, Plato
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5746210&forum_id=2#49075746) |
Date: July 6th, 2025 4:51 PM Author: Saffron Exciting Goal In Life Mother
Jansci von Nuemann
As much as I hate to nominate a turd, Ramanujan is easily a top contender
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5746210&forum_id=2#49076800) |
|
|