Date: May 23rd, 2013 11:07 PM
Author: Razzle garrison skinny woman
Did you ever think you'd need SCOTUS to write this paragraph?
"
We hold, in accord with the New Hampshire Supreme
Court, that state-law claims stemming from the storage
and disposal of a car, once towing has ended, are not
sufficiently connected to a motor carrier’s service with
respect to the transportation of property to warrant pre-
emption under §14501(c)(1). The New Hampshire law in
point regulates no towing services, no carriage of prop-
erty. Instead, it trains on custodians of stored vehicles
seeking to sell them. Congress did not displace the State’s
regulation of that activity by any federal prescription."
THANK GOD THEY CLEARED THAT UP.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2264317&forum_id=2#23258629)