3 (perhaps 4, counting the girl) victims doubling as witnesses that can independently verify all of the acts.

Dude clearly has no purpose to society.

give me one credible, non-religious argument against execution in a case like this

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2253189&forum_id=2#23176923)

I saw Bill O'Reilly argue that a life of extreme hard labor would be better retribution for the worst of the worst, actually.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2253189&forum_id=2#23176972)

(2) he offers no hope of reform or contribution to society

(3) putting him up in a cell and feeding him, caring to his illness will cost 40k/year till his death -- seems like a senseless use of government funds

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2253189&forum_id=2#23177648)

(2) he had a job... he could 'contribute' something as a prison laborer

(3) just because it's almost completely clear in this case that he did it, that doesn't mean he doesn't get to exhaust his appeals. a capital case is more expensive than feeding him. no mainstream person would support a move to cheaper Chinese-style summary trials and executions

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2253189&forum_id=2#23177663)

(2) You're joking right -- you'd allow someone that ran a makeshift dungeon in his home keep a 40k job?

(3) What I am saying is that in a case like this there should be no appeals. There are not going to be evidentiary errors. There is no "process" to preserve. Four people are going to be able to independently verify each and every capital crime

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2253189&forum_id=2#23177710)

(2) In federal prisons, felons are made to work. They don't make anything near $40k -- more like 10 cents an hour to be spent at the commissary. the benefit to society of their labor is much more than that

(3) So above you make an appeal to normative behavior to justify death penalty, but now you're arguing for something that our society and our constitutional right to due process don't allow. You are a pretty confused individual.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2253189&forum_id=2#23177785)

And, yes, in a case like this where this no room for evidentiary error, I am arguing against the procedural due process guarantee of appeal.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2253189&forum_id=2#23178199)

http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-3445_162-57418495/the-cost-of-a-nation-of-incarceration/

but sure, let's starve government discretionary funding to entitlement programs because moral hazard blah blah blah (xo conventional wisdom)

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2253189&forum_id=2#23177669)

[Not an argument for CP, but a counter-example to your claim.]

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2253189&forum_id=2#23177009)

there isn't one. you think rape and murder are wrong, and he should be punished for it. it all boils down to your sense of revenge and some vague primate principles of 'justice'...just morality by a different name.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2253189&forum_id=2#23177666)

but yeah, to make things explicit, it comes down to whether you think the state's role is revenge or keeping its citizenry safe (except for the argument that the death penalty is a deterrent, which i don't lend much credence)

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2253189&forum_id=2#23177804)

What this guy did was beyond horrible, but the girls are happy and alive right now. They have gone through a horrible ordeal, but they are alive.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2253189&forum_id=2#23176997)

(working here from the premise, which you seem to accept, that there are worse fates than the painless death someone gets from getting shot or being executed)

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2253189&forum_id=2#23177640)

http://codes.ohio.gov/orc/2903

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2253189&forum_id=2#23177003)