Scalia, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which Roberts, C.J., Kennedy, Thomas, Ginsburg, and Alito, JJ., joined.

Petitioners are the International Federation of Naked Bodybuilders (hereafter "IFNB"), an international athletic organization headquartered in Belgium. The IFNB asserts that complete and total nudity is required to maintain the purity of its athletic competitions and asserts that any form of clothing is inconsistent with the values it seeks to instill in MUSCLE STUDS. Respondent is Pierre Douton, a citizen of Senegal who is seeking to compete in COCK SHARKS 2012, an IFNB-sponsored competition in the state of Nevada. Douton, widely regarded as one of the world's greatest naked bodybuilders with perfect muscles and a fat, studly penis, is a recent convert to Islam who asserts that he must wear religious headgear while competing. This case presents the question whether the IFNB's total nudity rules violate Douton's First Amendment right of religious expression. We hold that it does not.

Generally, an employer may demand strict compliance with grooming and dress standards if it can show there is a good reason for its policy. With its origins in the "gentlemen's pure bodybuilding" movements of the early 20th century, the IFNB has as a foundational principle that nude exercise in the style of the ancient Greeks exalts the body and the mind. The IFNB points to the fact that the very word "gymnasium" comes from "Gymnazein", which translates to "to exercise naked." The word gumnazein came to mean "train, practice" after gumnos "naked", because it was common in ancient Greece for athletes to train with no clothes on to glorify the gods who had created them. The IFNB was founded by individuals who believed that the Ancient Greek form of exercise was superior because it put all focus on perfecting one's muscles and GROWING BIG one's STIMSTICK. Nudity, in the IFNB view, is not just an incidental state of its competitors, it is an absolute requirement.

Not has the nudity rule been applied in an arbitrary or discriminating manner. The IFNB has always enforced its total nudity rule completely at all stages of competition and preparation. There is no record of the IFNB ever allowing any form of clothing, even headgear, to be worn during a show or tournament by any of its stable of NAKED MUSCLE BULLS. There is no record of the IFNB ever allowing any form of clothing, even headgear, to be worn at any IFNB-affiliated gymnasium. Even so-called "training twinks", whose sole purpose is to be PATHETIC BETAS who are DOMINATED by FAT COCKS, are barred from wearing any article of clothing by IFNB rules. We hold that the IFNB's policies are based on good, historic reasons and that it has enforced and applied these rules fairly and consistently. While Mr. Douton is free to force his MASSIVE FUCKSTICK on any inferior man, he is not free to violate the IFNB's ban on all forms of clothing.

Breyer, J., filed a dissenting opinion, in which Sotomayor and Kagan, JJ., joined.

Today, the majority seeks vainly to command our respect with a TINY, FLACCID PISSWYRM of logic. We hope that the judges of history will give this pathetic show the low score it deserves. The MUSCLE NUTS who attend IFNB shows such as COCK SHARKS do not care what performers are wearing on their heads. They are there to ogle and grasp at STUDLY MUSCLE COCKS and, if they are fortunate, feel a splash of HOT CUM against their face during an expertly timed CUMSHOT. The IFNB would suffer no meaningful impairment to its core product if it allowed religious headgear on competitors. While the admiration of v-tapers, traps, and other muscles is also part of the IFNB experience, there are no meaningful muscles on the top of the head. This court should have given Mr. Douton the RESPECT he so clearly COMMANDS and allow him to express both his religious beliefs and his utter domination of all lesser men.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2525391&forum_id=2#25245474)

why did RGB vote with the conservaheros?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2525391&forum_id=2#25245565)