The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
|
 |
 
|
SSM: what were Scalia's thoughts on interstate commerce
| Jet-lagged kitchen masturbator | 06/28/12 |
| Jet-lagged kitchen masturbator | 06/28/12 |
| cerise senate | 06/28/12 |
| Jet-lagged kitchen masturbator | 06/29/12 |
| cerise senate | 06/28/12 |
| citrine garrison death wish | 03/30/23 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: June 28th, 2012 8:11 AM Author: Jet-lagged kitchen masturbator In that home growing medical marijuana case? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1981271&forum_id=2#20974081) |
Date: June 28th, 2012 8:22 AM Author: Jet-lagged kitchen masturbator Subject: Found it Unlike the power to regulate activities that have a substantial effect on interstate commerce, the power to enact laws enabling effective regulation of interstate commerce can only be exercised in conjunction with congressional regulation of an interstate market, and it extends only to those measures necessary to make the interstate regulation effective. As Lopez itself states, and the Court affirms today, Congress may regulate noneconomic intrastate activities only where the failure to do so “could … undercut” its regulation of interstate commerce. ... This is not a power that threatens to obliterate the line between “what is truly national and what is truly local.”[8] (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1981271&forum_id=2#20974104) |
 |
Date: June 28th, 2012 3:15 PM Author: cerise senate Similar reasoning supported the Court's judgment in Raich, which upheld Congress' authority to regulate marijuana grown for personal use. 545 U.S., at 19. Homegrown marijuana substantially affects the interstate market for marijuana, we observed, for “the high demand in the interstate market will [likely] draw such marijuana into that market.” Ibid. *50 Our decisions thus acknowledge Congress' authority, under the Commerce Clause, to direct the conduct of an individual today (the farmer in Wickard, stopped from growing excess wheat; the plaintiff in Raich, ordered to cease cultivating marijuana) because of a prophesied future transaction (the eventual sale of that wheat or marijuana in the interstate market). Congress' actions are even more rational in this case, where the future activity (the consumption of medical care) is certain to occur, the sole uncertainty being the time the activity will take place. |
|
Date: June 29th, 2012 9:46 AM Author: Jet-lagged kitchen masturbator (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1981271&forum_id=2#20982606) |
|
Date: June 28th, 2012 10:42 PM Author: cerise senate (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1981271&forum_id=2#20980260) |
|
Date: March 30th, 2023 8:42 PM Author: citrine garrison death wish (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1981271&forum_id=2#46120800) |