Wouldn’t have 2 kids if he wasn’t allowed to cum in me.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4055338&forum_id=2#36723352)

You obviously prefer even nastier cunts because you have no self worth.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4055338&forum_id=2#36723647)

Author: nutella

lol you clearly know nothing about handbags, and you can hardly tell the quality of a leather by just looking at a picture.

the ysl muse bag is a classic bag that is much better quality than a $600 LV speedy. it is double stitched, by hand. and it certainly not trendy at all, given that it has no bells and whistles.

LV does make quality handbags, but those are generally not usually under $1000 (or more like $2000).

http://www.xoxohth.com/thread.php?thread_id=748957&forum_id=2#9180967

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4055338&forum_id=2#36723743)

Author: mafoofan

'Double stitched, by hand' is a contradiction. Double-stitching typically signifies machine sewing. To attach two pieces of leather or cloth to each other, you must make two lines of stitches: one line to attach the two pieces, another line to bind the seam allowances to one side or another. 'Double-stitching' is a cost-saving method of construction: a machine is used to do two parallel lines of stitching at the same time. Thus, two lines appear on the exterior of the bag or garment (hence, it's called 'double-stitched'). It is far costlier to do single-needle stitching: the machine does each line one at a time so that only one line of stitches appears externally. It makes no sense to double-stitch by hand, mostly because it's undesirable, but also because it's not feasible to stitch two lines at the same time by hand.

All that being said, the stitching on this bag is entirely done by machine. That's not to say a person isn't handling the machine, but the stitches are far too uniform to be hand-stitched. Hand-stitching this bag would increase the cost by multiples, and, given the design, might not even be preferable.

I can judge the leather quality because: (1) I've looked as YSL bags upclose, and (2) the quality (or lack thereof) is apparent from the online photo. Notice that the graining in the leather is highly irregular and there are wrinkles that were set in before tanning. I applaud YSL for not using corrected-grain leather, but unfortunately their honesty is also revealing.

What is less obvious in the photo and more apparent in person is that the leather is chemical tanned, as opposed to vegetable tanned. Chemical tanning produces an unnatural sheen that can make leather look almost like plastic. In contrast, good leather has some depth to it. Here, all you see is the leather's surface.

http://www.xoxohth.com/thread.php?thread_id=748957&forum_id=2#9181120

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4055338&forum_id=2#36723746)