The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
|
 |
 
|
LOL @ SCALIA'S MAF STATEMENT IN ARIZONA DISSENT CASE
Poast new message in this thread
Date: June 25th, 2012 10:19 PM Author: awkward selfie Arizona has moved to protect its sovereignty—not in contradiction of federal law, but in complete compliance with it. The laws under challenge here do not extend or revise federal immigration restrictions, but merely enforce those restrictions more effectively. If securing its territory in this fashion is not within the power of Arizona, we should cease referring to it as a sovereign State. I dissent. |
 |
Date: June 25th, 2012 10:21 PM Author: Burgundy Nofapping National Security Agency As usual, Scalia is right. Liberals have no answer to Scalia. They can't point to the pompous bore Stephen Breyer, the sneering Marxist ideologue Rude Butthole Ginsburg, the half-wit affirmative action baby Sonya Sosominority, the unaccomplished Obama cronie Elena Pagan, or any of the ranting, raving lunatics on the Ninth Circus. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1979426&forum_id=2#20957904) |
|
Date: June 25th, 2012 10:23 PM Author: Exciting Chestnut Range (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1979426&forum_id=2#20957912) |
|
Date: July 2nd, 2012 10:42 AM Author: awkward selfie (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1979426&forum_id=2#21001941) |
|
Date: June 25th, 2012 10:23 PM Author: Vermilion passionate kitty cat FAR right, in fact. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1979426&forum_id=2#20957915) |
|
Date: June 26th, 2012 10:48 AM Author: sepia impressive center (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1979426&forum_id=2#20960710) |
|
Date: July 21st, 2012 3:31 PM Author: awkward selfie (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1979426&forum_id=2#21140003) |
|
Date: June 25th, 2012 10:26 PM Author: Filthy principal's office half-breed (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1979426&forum_id=2#20957932) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2012 12:30 PM Author: awkward selfie (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1979426&forum_id=2#21181563) |
|
Date: June 25th, 2012 10:27 PM Author: hideous background story (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1979426&forum_id=2#20957934) |
|
Date: June 25th, 2012 10:30 PM Author: smoky comical stage dood you mentioned obama without a shtick appropriate pseudonym (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1979426&forum_id=2#20957953) |
|
Date: June 28th, 2012 10:25 PM Author: awkward selfie (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1979426&forum_id=2#20980105) |
|
Date: June 25th, 2012 10:32 PM Author: awkward selfie Scalia is by far the most intellectually disingenuous justice on that bench (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1979426&forum_id=2#20957967) |
|
Date: June 25th, 2012 10:33 PM Author: hideous background story (guy with 80 IQ) (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1979426&forum_id=2#20957974) |
|
Date: June 25th, 2012 10:35 PM Author: awkward selfie Why do u hate Ruthie? She is so charming. Scalia is a disgruntled MAF italian (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1979426&forum_id=2#20957989) |
|
Date: June 25th, 2012 10:36 PM Author: hideous background story do you ever not non sequitir when pwned? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1979426&forum_id=2#20958009) |
|
Date: June 25th, 2012 10:39 PM Author: awkward selfie Lol @ your shitty notion of pwnage. U basically spurted out classical reptilian ad hominems. Bump this thread when Ginsburg and Co. Pwn u fucktards on thursday (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1979426&forum_id=2#20958035) |
|
Date: June 25th, 2012 10:42 PM Author: hideous background story sorry, dumb. but it has been established repeatedly that you are a very, very low IQ poster. i mean, you post all the time and clearly have no idea what you're babbling about and simply adopt the most retarded left wing position imaginable on any issue.
moreover, my post was not an ad hominem, dumdum. it was pointing out that it's awfully strange for a dumbfuck like yourself to be criticizing someone as accomplished as Scalia for being 'intellectually disingenuous', especially considering a) you give absolutely no indication of what makes him 'intellectually disingenuous' and b) you likely have no idea what disingenuous means.
hth. |
|
Date: June 25th, 2012 10:44 PM Author: flickering theatre not to out ssm, but he's smarter than he pretends to be (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1979426&forum_id=2#20958077) |
|
Date: June 25th, 2012 10:45 PM Author: hideous background story sure thing man. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1979426&forum_id=2#20958093) |
|
Date: June 25th, 2012 10:46 PM Author: flickering theatre you think his copying and pasting schtick is indicative of how his mind actually works? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1979426&forum_id=2#20958114) |
|
Date: June 25th, 2012 10:49 PM Author: hideous background story why are you posting under a pumo alias, slim? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1979426&forum_id=2#20958144) |
|
Date: June 25th, 2012 10:52 PM Author: awkward selfie Scalia was so fuckin mad in boumediene v bush I was about to die from laughter. His dissent read like a law clerk run amok. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1979426&forum_id=2#20958188) |
|
Date: June 25th, 2012 10:53 PM Author: hideous background story keep non sequiting, faggot. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1979426&forum_id=2#20958192) |
|
Date: June 25th, 2012 10:56 PM Author: awkward selfie Well are you an original public meaning originalist? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1979426&forum_id=2#20958241) |
|
Date: June 25th, 2012 10:58 PM Author: hideous background story http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1979426&forum_id=2#20958192 (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1979426&forum_id=2#20958256) |
|
Date: June 25th, 2012 10:50 PM Author: awkward selfie Don't know what he talking about, but u seriously need to buttress and substantiate your outlandish assertions instead of engaging in useless character attacks that don't advance the discussion (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1979426&forum_id=2#20958148) |
|
Date: June 25th, 2012 10:46 PM Author: awkward selfie Exhibit of Scalia's disingenuous: http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Castle_Rock_v._Gonzales (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1979426&forum_id=2#20958108) |
|
Date: June 25th, 2012 10:49 PM Author: hideous background story oh okay. thanks for that. you clearly know what you're talking about.
|
|
Date: June 25th, 2012 10:51 PM Author: awkward selfie Lol @ your inability to engage me like the analytical guru u clam to be. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1979426&forum_id=2#20958163) |
|
Date: June 25th, 2012 10:52 PM Author: hideous background story yes, i stand stunned and in awe of the spellbinding analysis you just demonstrated by posting a link.
gas yourself you queer. |
|
Date: June 25th, 2012 10:54 PM Author: awkward selfie Explain why Scalia is not a partisan hack in a few lucid sentences. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1979426&forum_id=2#20958215) |
|
Date: June 25th, 2012 10:57 PM Author: hideous background story Explain why RBG, Breyer, Stevens, etc. are not 'partisan hacks' and I will do the same. Thanks. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1979426&forum_id=2#20958255) |
|
Date: June 25th, 2012 11:02 PM Author: electric translucent affirmative action temple (dipshit who can't seem to explain shit) (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1979426&forum_id=2#20958316) |
|
Date: June 25th, 2012 11:03 PM Author: hideous background story (drive by mcFaggot, aka slim shady pumo alias) (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1979426&forum_id=2#20958327) |
|
Date: June 25th, 2012 11:05 PM Author: electric translucent affirmative action temple more devastating analyis (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1979426&forum_id=2#20958357) |
|
Date: June 25th, 2012 11:05 PM Author: hideous background story slim, link me to a single post of yours that is not a non-sequitir/conclusory statement that shows an ounce of independent thought. thanks. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1979426&forum_id=2#20958369) |
|
Date: June 26th, 2012 11:09 AM Author: sepia impressive center *STYLED on* (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1979426&forum_id=2#20960815) |
|
Date: July 6th, 2012 3:55 PM Author: awkward selfie (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1979426&forum_id=2#21029114) |
|
Date: June 25th, 2012 10:40 PM Author: Brass cheese-eating jewess friendly grandma tbf at least Thomas is pretty steadfast on preemption issues, pretty much always siding with the state unless there's an unequivocal statutory provision preempting the state law.
his dissent reads like "like I've been sayin' all along, motherfuckers..." |
|
Date: June 26th, 2012 1:36 AM Author: plum mildly autistic gunner piazza 180 synopsis of the essence of thomas (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1979426&forum_id=2#20959778) |
|
Date: July 21st, 2012 3:26 PM Author: awkward selfie (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1979426&forum_id=2#21139962) |
|
Date: June 28th, 2012 6:47 PM Author: shaky vivacious state TCR
scalia is so full of shit and ragu im surprised it isnt oozing out from his ears |
Date: June 25th, 2012 10:22 PM Author: Vermilion passionate kitty cat He is such a phony faggot. I hope like hell Roberts insisted on writing the majority when they overturn ObamaCare. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1979426&forum_id=2#20957905) |
|
Date: June 25th, 2012 10:26 PM Author: Dashing well-lubricated tanning salon puppy i think Roberts did write it, brother (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1979426&forum_id=2#20957925) |
|
Date: June 25th, 2012 10:27 PM Author: Vermilion passionate kitty cat You have heard that? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1979426&forum_id=2#20957935) |
|
Date: June 25th, 2012 10:28 PM Author: Dashing well-lubricated tanning salon puppy no but the dudes at scotusblog induced this with some confidence from how the decisions were announced today. i didnt really read their explanation but that was the conclusion (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1979426&forum_id=2#20957943) |
|
Date: June 25th, 2012 10:28 PM Author: hideous background story how is that in the least bit phony you dumbfuck? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1979426&forum_id=2#20957939) |
|
Date: June 25th, 2012 10:22 PM Author: Brass cheese-eating jewess friendly grandma More impressive was Alito's dissent in the juvenile life sentences w/o parole case. His Eighth Amendment dissents have all been pretty 180 for exposing the majority's enterprise for exactly what it is. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1979426&forum_id=2#20957910) |
|
Date: June 25th, 2012 10:26 PM Author: Dashing well-lubricated tanning salon puppy tcr (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1979426&forum_id=2#20957926) |
|
Date: June 25th, 2012 10:28 PM Author: Cracking church building tcr (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1979426&forum_id=2#20957941) |
|
Date: June 25th, 2012 10:31 PM Author: awkward selfie And just what might that enterprise be? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1979426&forum_id=2#20957958) |
|
Date: June 25th, 2012 10:32 PM Author: smoky comical stage judishal actuvisam (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1979426&forum_id=2#20957968) |
|
Date: June 25th, 2012 10:34 PM Author: awkward selfie Ahhh yes alito and his italtian fuck buddy Scalia are the most intellectually honest justices currently on the bench... (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1979426&forum_id=2#20957982) |
|
Date: June 25th, 2012 10:32 PM Author: glassy self-absorbed business firm explain this for a dumb faggot like me (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1979426&forum_id=2#20957961) |
|
Date: June 25th, 2012 10:38 PM Author: Brass cheese-eating jewess friendly grandma His dissent is pretty straightforward:
http://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/11pdf/10-9646.pdf
Both the provenance and philosophical basis for this [evolving standards of decency in evaluating criminal punishment] standard were problematic from the start. (Is it true that our society is inexorably evolving in the direction of greater and greater decency? Who says so, and how did this particular philosophy of history find its way into our fundamental law? And in any event, aren't elected representatives more likely than unaccountable judges to reflect changing societal standards?) But at least at the start, the Court insisted that these "evolving standards" represented something other than the personal views of five Justices.
FUCKING THROWDOWN |
|
Date: June 25th, 2012 10:40 PM Author: smoky comical stage whereas the reptile justices always respect the will of the people as expressed by are legislative bodies (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1979426&forum_id=2#20958040) |
|
Date: June 25th, 2012 10:43 PM Author: Brass cheese-eating jewess friendly grandma Nonresponsive. His dissent has much less to do with decrying judicial activism in itself, and more to do with exposing how disingenuous and embarrassing it becomes when actually embedded into legal doctrine. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1979426&forum_id=2#20958065) |
|
Date: June 25th, 2012 10:46 PM Author: flickering theatre the evolution makes no sense, but kagan's opinion isn't about evolution. she basically uses pediatric psych to conclude that kids are less culpable, then says that the disproportionality is cruel. it seems like a reasonable enough argument to me, if you believe that the eighth amendment has any meaning at all besides prohibiting stuff that no state does bc everyone recognizes it's barbaric (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1979426&forum_id=2#20958111) |
|
Date: June 25th, 2012 10:51 PM Author: Cracking church building Is it cruel and unusual or just cruel? Being cruel by itself is not enough. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1979426&forum_id=2#20958162) |
|
Date: June 25th, 2012 10:57 PM Author: Brass cheese-eating jewess friendly grandma You could say that it's unusual to have a categorical life-without-parole statute that doesn't grant any variances. Even though the majority telegraphs the fact that it will probably bar such sentences as a categorical matter when the issue presents itself next time (so they can be seen as "evolving" in that direction in small steps), they point to this as one of the reasons why such laws should be struck down. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1979426&forum_id=2#20958245) |
|
Date: June 25th, 2012 11:04 PM Author: Cracking church building How is it unusual? The majority of states require it and have done so in thousands of cases. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1979426&forum_id=2#20958344) |
|
Date: June 25th, 2012 11:05 PM Author: Brass cheese-eating jewess friendly grandma idk brah I'm not defending it (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1979426&forum_id=2#20958370) |
|
Date: June 25th, 2012 11:09 PM Author: flickering theatre ugh I hate textualist readings of the Constitution. it's one thing to be an originalist, but if you're going to start reading it like a statute... disaster. (see, e.g., "congress shall make no law abridging the freedom of speech") (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1979426&forum_id=2#20958417) |
|
Date: June 25th, 2012 10:43 PM Author: awkward selfie Dayum that is pretty 180. That's some Hegelian next level analysis right thur!!! Nah what I mean dawg? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1979426&forum_id=2#20958066) |
|
Date: June 25th, 2012 10:45 PM Author: Brass cheese-eating jewess friendly grandma So read the dissent and tell me where he's off-base. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1979426&forum_id=2#20958090) |
|
Date: June 25th, 2012 10:43 PM Author: Cracking church building 1. "Evolving standards of decency that mark the progress of a maturing society" standard is bullshit cover for the opinions of what punishments five justices wish to allow.
2. The determination of evolving standards assume that decency is improving.
3. There is no coherent analysis for determining the evolving standards. It is all inward looking and now ignores legislative judgments. |
|
Date: June 25th, 2012 11:00 PM Author: claret national gaming laptop Just draw and quarter. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1979426&forum_id=2#20958280) |
|
Date: June 25th, 2012 11:02 PM Author: hideous background story good thing we have scotus' evolving standards in place. there were countless juries looking to draw and quarter until the great case of Homo McFaggot v. NiggerApe, which libs look back on with such pride. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1979426&forum_id=2#20958318) |
|
Date: June 26th, 2012 11:26 AM Author: sepia impressive center *is amused*
*is offended*
*is conflicted* |
|
Date: June 28th, 2012 6:46 PM Author: awkward selfie (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1979426&forum_id=2#20978710) |
|
Date: June 26th, 2012 1:41 AM Author: vigorous territorial ticket booth black woman To be fair,
tcr
Devastating dissent - he really highlighted how utterly and consistently full of shit Kennedy has been for the past decade on that front. What a thoroughly unprincipled fuck that guy is, and his wishy-washy horseshit has now basically gutted 1/10 of our Bill of Rights. Thanks Tony! |
|
Date: June 25th, 2012 10:29 PM Author: pea-brained exhilarant school cafeteria turdskin Did he include a pic of his cocklet? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1979426&forum_id=2#20957948) |
|
Date: June 25th, 2012 10:55 PM Author: Dashing well-lubricated tanning salon puppy elect romney, replace RBG, flip every lib majority involving kennedy, including those upholding the core of roe.
explain to me why this will not happen. |
|
Date: June 25th, 2012 11:01 PM Author: electric translucent affirmative action temple itt: ssm badly pwns a pumotile (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1979426&forum_id=2#20958303) |
|
Date: June 25th, 2012 11:04 PM Author: hideous background story yes, slim. you pwned me bad. congrats.
how is nojerbpwnage?
|
|
Date: June 26th, 2012 12:12 AM Author: Very tactful keepsake machete idea he suggested (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1979426&forum_id=2#20959175) |
|
Date: June 26th, 2012 1:45 AM Author: bull headed racy plaza antonin is the apotheosis of the lost cause (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1979426&forum_id=2#20959822) |
|
Date: August 19th, 2013 10:18 PM Author: Bat shit crazy brethren maf (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1979426&forum_id=2#23881636) |
|
Date: August 19th, 2013 10:18 PM Author: Bat shit crazy brethren maf (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1979426&forum_id=2#23881637) |