Virtually everyone wearing masks. Who the fuck is still getting this.
| Useless Menage | 07/10/20 | | sable half-breed lettuce | 07/10/20 | | Motley navy keepsake machete | 07/10/20 | | sable half-breed lettuce | 07/10/20 | | violent bespoke boltzmann trailer park | 07/10/20 | | Fighting Thirsty Tank | 07/10/20 | | Violet Bateful Milk | 07/10/20 | | ungodly coral site | 07/10/20 | | Massive area | 07/10/20 | | Shivering Range | 07/10/20 | | Useless Menage | 07/10/20 | | Chrome metal abode | 07/10/20 | | aquamarine cuck | 07/10/20 | | Umber blathering gay wizard | 07/10/20 | | ungodly coral site | 07/10/20 | | passionate alcoholic hospital voyeur | 07/10/20 | | Excitant crusty party of the first part whorehouse | 07/10/20 | | passionate alcoholic hospital voyeur | 07/10/20 | | Umber blathering gay wizard | 07/10/20 | | passionate alcoholic hospital voyeur | 07/10/20 | | Excitant crusty party of the first part whorehouse | 07/10/20 | | pearly brunch | 07/10/20 | | aquamarine cuck | 07/10/20 | | ungodly coral site | 07/10/20 | | Ultramarine internet-worthy stead liquid oxygen | 07/10/20 | | ungodly coral site | 07/10/20 | | vengeful church | 07/10/20 | | Useless Menage | 07/10/20 | | aquamarine cuck | 07/10/20 | | passionate alcoholic hospital voyeur | 07/10/20 | | Motley navy keepsake machete | 07/10/20 | | ungodly coral site | 07/10/20 | | pearly brunch | 07/10/20 | | aquamarine cuck | 07/10/20 | | pearly brunch | 07/10/20 | | aquamarine cuck | 07/10/20 | | pearly brunch | 07/10/20 | | aquamarine cuck | 07/10/20 | | medicated gaming laptop coffee pot | 07/10/20 | | Motley navy keepsake machete | 07/10/20 | | pearly brunch | 07/10/20 | | jade bawdyhouse | 07/10/20 | | pearly brunch | 07/10/20 | | jade bawdyhouse | 07/10/20 | | Ultramarine internet-worthy stead liquid oxygen | 07/10/20 | | ungodly coral site | 07/10/20 | | passionate alcoholic hospital voyeur | 07/10/20 | | arousing burgundy toilet seat | 07/10/20 | | ungodly coral site | 07/10/20 | | arousing burgundy toilet seat | 07/10/20 | | Emerald Mind-boggling House Roast Beef | 07/10/20 | | aquamarine cuck | 07/10/20 | | Motley navy keepsake machete | 07/10/20 | | ungodly coral site | 07/10/20 | | passionate alcoholic hospital voyeur | 07/10/20 | | dashing dull internal respiration property | 07/10/20 | | embarrassed to the bone locus | 07/10/20 | | vengeful church | 07/10/20 | | arousing burgundy toilet seat | 07/10/20 | | vengeful church | 07/10/20 | | aquamarine cuck | 07/10/20 | | dashing dull internal respiration property | 07/10/20 | | Emerald Mind-boggling House Roast Beef | 07/10/20 | | Useless Menage | 07/10/20 | | vengeful church | 07/10/20 | | Honey-headed titillating reading party hall | 07/10/20 | | Comical headpube | 07/10/20 | | Motley navy keepsake machete | 07/10/20 | | Crawly Kitty Cat Private Investor | 07/10/20 | | Fuchsia theatre sneaky criminal | 07/10/20 | | Useless Menage | 07/10/20 | | embarrassed to the bone locus | 07/10/20 | | Crawly Kitty Cat Private Investor | 07/10/20 | | magical bat shit crazy garrison | 07/10/20 | | Maniacal parlor | 07/10/20 | | charismatic pearl corn cake | 07/10/20 | | Gold field | 07/10/20 | | yapping legal warrant | 07/10/20 | | Excitant crusty party of the first part whorehouse | 07/10/20 | | Fragrant Deranged Senate | 07/10/20 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: July 10th, 2020 9:27 AM Author: Massive area
its cuz they are testing so many more people than they were testing 3 months ago.
Tons of people without symptoms get tested now
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4580619&forum_id=2#40578958) |
Date: July 10th, 2020 9:32 AM Author: aquamarine cuck
Real talk: the mask bullshit is overwhelmingly showmanship. When this started a bunch of people really stopped meeting people, going places and doing things. Now people are going on tinder dates, protests are still happening, people are eating at restaurants, etc. And masks aren't 100%.
The fact is that the purpose of the mask is as much about demonstrating conformity to requirements than anything else.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4580619&forum_id=2#40578978) |
 |
Date: July 10th, 2020 9:37 AM Author: ungodly coral site
A recent study published in Health Affairs, for example, compared the COVID-19 growth rate before and after mask mandates in 15 states and the District of Columbia. It found that mask mandates led to a slowdown in daily COVID-19 growth rate, which became more apparent over time. The first five days after a mandate, the daily growth rate slowed by 0.9 percentage-points compared to the five days prior to the mandate; at three weeks, the daily growth rate had slowed by 2 percentage-points.
Another study looked at coronavirus deaths across 198 countries and found that those with cultural norms or government policies favoring mask-wearing had lower death rates.
Two compelling case reports also suggest that masks can prevent transmission in high-risk scenarios, said Chin-Hong and Rutherford. In one case, a man flew from China to Toronto and subsequently tested positive for COVID-19. He had a dry cough and wore a mask on the flight, and all 25 people closest to him on the flight tested negative for COVID-19. In another case, in late May, two hair stylists in Missouri had close contact with 140 clients while sick with COVID-19. Everyone wore a mask and none of the clients tested positive.
In one simulation, researchers predicted that 80 percent of the population wearing masks would do more to reduce COVID-19 spread than a strict lockdown.
The latest forecast from the Institute of Health Metrics and Evaluation suggests that 33,000 deaths could be avoided by October 1 if 95 percent of people wore masks in public.
Even if you live in a community where few people wear masks, you would still reduce your own chances of catching the virus by wearing one, said Chin-Hong and Rutherford.
“The concept is risk reduction rather than absolute prevention,” said Chin-Hong. “You don’t throw up your hands if you think a mask is not 100 percent effective. That’s silly. Nobody’s taking a cholesterol medicine because they’re going to prevent a heart attack 100 percent of the time, but you’re reducing your risk substantially.”
https://www.ucsf.edu/news/2020/06/417906/still-confused-about-masks-heres-science-behind-how-face-masks-prevent
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4580619&forum_id=2#40578992) |
 |
Date: July 10th, 2020 9:58 AM Author: Umber blathering gay wizard
also this study
>> Use of Masks and Personal Protective Equipment
Masks and other personal protective equipment (PPE)are essential for controlling transmission of influenza in hospitals. For people who work in hospitals, current CDC guidelines for influenza infection control recommend droplet precautions, including the use of surgical masks.But HHS planning guidelines also rightly acknowledge that the uncertainties regarding the potential of virus transmission at the start of a new pandemic would recommend that airborne precautions be used in hospitals—that is, N95masks (already in short supply)7or powered air purifying respirators (PAPRs).10Patients would be advised to wear surgical masks to diminish the number of infectious respiratory particles being dispersed into the air, thereby diminishing the likelihood of further spread.55
In Asia during the SARS period, many people in the affected communities wore surgical masks when in public. But studies have shown that the ordinary surgical mask does little to prevent inhalation of small droplets bearing influenza virus.56 The pores in the mask become blocked by moisture from breathing, and the air stream simply diverts around the mask. There are few data avail-able to support the efficacy of N95 or surgical masks out-side a healthcare setting. N95 masks need to be fit-tested to be efficacious and are uncomfortable to wear for more than an hour or two.55,57 More important, the supplies of such masks are too limited to even ensure that hospitals will have necessary reserves.58 <<
http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.552.1109&rep=rep1&type=pdf
---------------------------------------
Interestingly, the authors of that paper, who argue against lockdowns, masks, etc, are now total virusbadmos. Wonder what changed?
https://twitter.com/AlexBerenson/status/1280953660877529090
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4580619&forum_id=2#40579099) |
 |
Date: July 10th, 2020 9:36 AM Author: pearly brunch
This is CR. The masks help, but most people are using shitty cloth face coverings, not N95s or even surgical masks. I'm sure even the cloth face coverings are better than nothing, but it's not going to offer full protection. Also, people take their masks off to eat in restaurants and go to bars.
The other issue is that cases are down BIGLY in most lib cities where mask compliance is high, but skyrocketing in Florida, AZ, TX, etc., where mask compliance is low because MUH FREEDOMS.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4580619&forum_id=2#40578990) |
 |
Date: July 10th, 2020 9:45 AM Author: ungodly coral site
"Does it help anyone? Of course not. "
Flame. It doesn't help as much as an N95, but it still works about half as well.
https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.04.17.20069567v2.full.pdf
EDIT: some retard below responded with an earlier, shittier paper that has been retracted for being statistically underpowered, something mentioned at the top of the article he linked, LOL.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4580619&forum_id=2#40579026) |
 |
Date: July 10th, 2020 9:48 AM Author: Ultramarine internet-worthy stead liquid oxygen
And as for masks? Surgical masks reduced the amount of virus released from a sick person in the form of droplets but not aerosols for influenza; the masks reduced coronavirus in both droplets and aerosols; and they didn't reduce either in rhinovirus. For the seasonal coronavirus, researchers found the virus in droplets in 3 out of 10 samples from participants not wearing masks and in aerosols in 4 out of 10 samples taken without masks. In samples taken with masks, no virus was detected in either droplets or aerosols.
The difference between viruses could have something to do with where in the respiratory tract these infectious invaders make their homes, said Cowling, who is also co-director of the WHO Collaborating Center for Infectious Disease Epidemiology and Control. For example, a virus that reproduces deep in the lungs might need to travel in smaller particles to make it all the way out into the world, while one that reproduces mostly in the nose and throat may be more easily mobilized in bigger droplets.
The results from influenza and seasonal coronaviruses suggest that surgical masks can help keep people with COVID-19 from spreading the virus, Cowling said. SARS-CoV-2 probably behaves similarly to the viruses he and his team studied, he said, and the fact that people can spread the virus before they experience symptoms is an argument for recommending masks for everyone.
But experts are still mixed on the potential usefulness of non-N95 masks.
"To me, it's not harmful to wear these masks, but it doesn't look from this study like there is a whole lot of benefit," Jones said. The sample size for seasonal coronavirus was small, she said, and there was a large amount of non-mask-related variation in how much virus people emitted, particularly given that the majority of samples without masks didn't have detectable coronavirus.
One thing everyone does agree on is that, whatever containment provided by non-fitted masks do provide, homemade fabric masks are the least effective. The recommendations that everyone wear masks are because "any kind of impediment is better than nothing," Chu said. But fabric masks are not expected to be as protective as surgical masks, she said. That's why public health officials are warning people to remain at least 6 feet apart from one another, even if they are wearing masks. In other words, homemade masks are likely to be just a small piece of the puzzle for controlling the COVID-19 pandemic.
"There's been enough research done to be able to confidently say that masks wouldn't be able to stop the spread of infection, that they would only have a small effect on transmission," Cowling said. "We shouldn't be relying on masks to help us go back to normal."
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.livescience.com/amp/are-face-masks-effective-reducing-coronavirus-spread.html
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4580619&forum_id=2#40579044) |
|
|