The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
|
 |
 
|
Comey’s motions to dismiss being filed Monday
Poast new message in this thread
Date: October 18th, 2025 8:39 PM Author: vibrant national security agency Pepper thy angus cons (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5787602&forum_id=2#49358591) |
 |
Date: October 21st, 2025 10:29 AM Author: crusty maroon jewess queen of the night no one cares you fuckhead tranny retard. it's obv just trump fucking with him as payback. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5787602&forum_id=2#49363664) |
|
Date: October 21st, 2025 1:50 PM Author: vibrant national security agency so his “payback” is the case getting dismissed with prejudice before it even reaches trial and Trump and his team of lolyers looking incompetent? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5787602&forum_id=2#49364137) |
|
Date: October 21st, 2025 5:26 PM Author: crusty maroon jewess queen of the night no one cares about lawyer bullshit you dork. everyone already knew and is now being reminded that this piece of shit put in a coup against a 3x elected president (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5787602&forum_id=2#49364726) |
Date: October 18th, 2025 8:41 PM Author: vibrant national security agency Also Illinois’ and Chicago’s response briefs to Trump’s emergency SCOTUS appeal are due the same day. We could have a decision on that one by Tuesday. I predict SCOTUS refuses to lift the stay and refuses to hear the appeal. If they do hear the appeal Trump will lose 7-2 with the two Nazis voting in his favor (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5787602&forum_id=2#49358600) |
|
Date: October 18th, 2025 9:35 PM Author: Godawful Laughsome Selfie Mad-dog Skullcap I don't think Trump wins any conservatives for the simple fact that the states themselves oppose this. Virtually every statute we have on this seems to assume that if the POTUS is commanding the National Guard within a state, the governor of that state has asked for help. No one in Congress ever imagined a scenario where the governor is saying "we don't need help" but the POTUS is deploying the NG in that state (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5787602&forum_id=2#49358728) |
|
Date: October 21st, 2025 9:42 AM Author: vibrant national security agency Get out of my thread schizo (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5787602&forum_id=2#49363599) |
|
Date: October 21st, 2025 10:29 AM Author: crusty maroon jewess queen of the night get a life dork (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5787602&forum_id=2#49363665) |
|
Date: October 19th, 2025 1:13 PM Author: vibrant national security agency (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5787602&forum_id=2#49359868) |
|
Date: October 20th, 2025 8:59 AM Author: vibrant national security agency 7th Circuit: “Political opposition is not rebellion. Also, Trump is a tool and nobody respects him. We vote 3-0 to affirm.” (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5787602&forum_id=2#49361329) |
|
Date: October 20th, 2025 10:56 PM Author: vibrant national security agency Motions look pretty solid to me. With the January trial date looming we could get a quick dismissal
https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.vaed.582136/gov.uscourts.vaed.582136.59.0_1.pdf |
|
Date: October 20th, 2025 11:31 PM Author: Ivory frozen preventive strike piazza lol at this shit (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5787602&forum_id=2#49363238) |
|
Date: October 21st, 2025 8:31 AM Author: vibrant national security agency you seem upset (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5787602&forum_id=2#49363533) |
|
Date: October 21st, 2025 9:43 AM Author: Ivory frozen preventive strike piazza calmer than you are (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5787602&forum_id=2#49363601) |
|
Date: October 21st, 2025 10:24 AM Author: vibrant national security agency waivin your fuckin shitpoast around? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5787602&forum_id=2#49363654) |
|
Date: October 20th, 2025 11:04 PM Author: vibrant national security agency Lawyer who signed the brief
https://carmichaellegal.com/attorneys/jessica-carmichael/ |
|
Date: October 21st, 2025 5:18 PM Author: big karate would (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5787602&forum_id=2#49364709) |
|
Date: October 20th, 2025 11:11 PM Author: domesticated geriatric nursing home I think he's guilty by how difficult the actual paragraph refuting the facts is to parse.
It seems to me he's arguing that - even though Cruz in that line of questioning asks if Comey ever authorized leaks about Trump - Comey's response was that he stands by his statements in 2017 - but those 2017 statements were about leaks about Hilary
It seems like Comey is sort of ceding that he authorized leaks about Trump, but is arguing in the Cruz exchange that he never lied about it, because he just spoke in riddles that actually referred to Hillary.
Is that right?
---------
The indictment focuses on testimony that Mr. Comey gave in response to questioning by Senator Ted Cruz at a Senate Judiciary Committee hearing on the Crossfire Hurricane investigation. See Oversight of the Crossfire Hurricane Investigation: Day 3, Hearing Before the U.S. Senate Committee on the Judiciary, 116th Cong. (Sept. 30, 2020), During that hearing, Senator Cruz described how, during 2017 testimony before the Senate Judiciary Committee, Mr. Comey had denied “ever authoriz[ing] someone else at the FBI to be an anonymous source in news reports about the Trump investigation or the Clinton Administration.” Excerpt of Transcript of Oversight of the Crossfire Hurricane Investigation: Day 3, Hearing Before the U.S. Senate Committee on the Judiciary, 116th Cong., at 11 (Sept. 30 2020) (“Crossfire Hurricane Oversight Transcript”), Exhibit C. Senator Cruz then asserted that Andrew McCabe, who previously served as Mr. Comey’s Deputy Director of the FBI, “publicly and repeatedly stated that he leaked information to the Wall Street Journal and that [Mr. Comey was] directly aware of it, and that [Mr. Comey] directly authorized it.” Id. Senator Cruz asked Mr. Comey “[w]ho’s telling the truth?” Mr. Comey responded: “I can only speak to my testimony,” and “I stand by . . . the testimony you summarized that I gave in May of 2017.” Id. Senator Cruz followed up by asking: “So, your testimony is you’ve never authorized anyone to leak. And Mr. McCabe when if he says contrary, is not telling the truth, is that correct?” Id. In response, Mr. Comey stated: “Again, I’m not going to characterize [McCabe’s] testimony, but mine is the same today.” Id. The indictment misstates the exchange between Senator Cruz and Mr. Comey. Senator Cruz asked Mr. Comey to affirm or deny prior testimony that he authorized “someone else at the FBI to be an anonymous source in news reports about . . . the Clinton Administration.” But Hillary Clinton was not elected, and Senator Grassley’s original questioning in 2017 related to the “Clinton investigation.” See FBI Oversight Transcript at 5, Exhibit B. The indictment nonetheless mischaracterizes Mr. Comey as stating that he “had not ‘authorized someone else at the FBI to be an anonymous source in news reports’ regarding an FBI investigation concerning PERSON 1,” ECF No. 1 at 1 (emphasis added). Thus, the indictment replaces Senator Cruz’s reference to the “Clinton Administration” with a reference to “PERSON 1” (Hillary Clinton) and misleadingly attributes statements to Mr. Comey that he did not in fact make during his September 30, 2020, testimony. 8
Further, the indictment omits Senator Cruz’s words that explicitly narrow the focus of his questions to Mr. McCabe and misleadingly implies that the questioning related to Mr. Richman. In fact, Mr. Comey’s September 2020 exchange with Senator Cruz made no reference whatsoever to Mr. Richman, who ultimately appears in the indictment as PERSON 3. Instead, the context of the exchange confirms that Senator Cruz was asking about leaks by Mr. McCabe—indeed, Senator Cruz asked Mr. Comey whether he or Mr. McCabe was “telling the truth.” In other words, the indictment presents an inaccurate description of the testimony at the heart of this case.
|
|
Date: October 21st, 2025 8:34 AM Author: vibrant national security agency are you dumb? authorizing leaks to the press isn’t a crime, which is why he wasn’t charged for that. if they don’t have him on lying then they don’t have him on anything. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5787602&forum_id=2#49363535) |
|
Date: October 21st, 2025 11:55 AM Author: domesticated geriatric nursing home To me, if he did leak, then this statement below is a lie. It's cutesie to then argue this statement wasn't meant to say that he never leaked the Trump investigation:
"So, your testimony is you’ve never authorized anyone to leak. And Mr. McCabe when if he says contrary, is not telling the truth, is that correct?” Id. In response, Mr. Comey stated: “Again, I’m not going to characterize [McCabe’s] testimony, but mine is the same today.” |
|
Date: October 21st, 2025 12:45 PM Author: vibrant national security agency how is it a lie? You said yourself: “It seems to me he's arguing that - even though Cruz in that line of questioning asks if Comey ever authorized leaks about Trump - Comey's response was that he stands by his statements in 2017 - but those 2017 statements were about leaks about Hilary” (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5787602&forum_id=2#49363952) |
|
Date: October 21st, 2025 12:57 PM Author: domesticated geriatric nursing home If Cruise says "Do you say today that you never leaked information about the Trump investigation"
And Comey responds "I stand by my September 5, 2022 statements."
But his September 5, 2022 statements were about his statements about sandwiches - isn't that sort of a lie?
Also, seems in this case his lawyers are reverse engineering this to not be a lie, and in the moment Comey probably thought he was saying he never leaked info about Trump. |
|
Date: October 21st, 2025 1:48 PM Author: vibrant national security agency retard shtick?
“No, your honor, he didn’t lie, but we believe he thought he did.” |
|
Date: October 21st, 2025 8:23 PM Author: domesticated geriatric nursing home I like how libs don't even have the self-awareness to realize taht Comey's pleading essentially means that Cruz was right -
Comey's argument is just saying he dodged the question. |
|
Date: October 21st, 2025 8:33 PM Author: vibrant national security agency and this would matter if leaking to the press were a crime (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5787602&forum_id=2#49365009) |
|
Date: October 21st, 2025 8:37 PM Author: Ivory frozen preventive strike piazza ? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5787602&forum_id=2#49365024) |
|
Date: October 21st, 2025 8:38 PM Author: vibrant national security agency you’re too smart to be a reptile. what made you choose the darkside (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5787602&forum_id=2#49365028) |
|
Date: October 21st, 2025 8:48 PM Author: Ivory frozen preventive strike piazza tyty. i wouldn't call myself a reptile, but much of the stuff the modern-day lib supports is not something i want to get behind. people like labels and teams, but i personally don't like to align myself with groups and risk running afoul of their RULES.
as to my "?", isn't the issue whether he lied to congress about leaking and not whether leaking is itself illegal? |
|
Date: October 21st, 2025 8:58 PM Author: vibrant national security agency yes but if you read this subthread the quotemo is conceding that they don’t even have him on lying
anyway this is all academic since this case is getting dismissed on a pretrial motion
also Trump’s ID lawyer US atty is going to be disqualified:
https://x.com/kyledcheney/status/1980725171142168668?s=46
but I think Comey would rather win on his selective/vindictive prosecution motion so the charges get dismissed with prejudice |
|
Date: November 3rd, 2025 11:13 PM Author: Topaz zippy round eye "Comey's argument is just saying he dodged the question."
Which means Cruz is a shitty cross-examiner. Just because a witness doesn't answer your question doesn't mean the witness lied.
Cruz: "Have you ever authorized classified information to be leaked to the Press?"
You: "I stand by my previous statement from July 1, 2022"
July 1, 2022 statement: "Goddamn I love a nice hard, veiny penis in my mouth!"
You didn't lie. You simply didn't answer the question and Cruz sucks at getting a clear answer. |
|
Date: October 21st, 2025 2:37 PM Author: vibrant national security agency I didn’t realize Comey’s judge is a former public defender. There’s zero chance this motion isn’t granted with prejudice (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5787602&forum_id=2#49364310) |
|
Date: October 21st, 2025 8:41 PM Author: Godawful Laughsome Selfie Mad-dog Skullcap they rigged the judge selection I'm sure. No one picked him at random (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5787602&forum_id=2#49365038) |
|
Date: October 21st, 2025 8:43 PM Author: vibrant national security agency nothing wrong with libs fighting fire with napalm (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5787602&forum_id=2#49365044) |
|
Date: October 21st, 2025 9:02 PM Author: Godawful Laughsome Selfie Mad-dog Skullcap It's not even libs at this point, it's basically anyone who went to a T6 law school (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5787602&forum_id=2#49365082) |
|
Date: October 30th, 2025 5:15 PM Author: vibrant national security agency New Comey motion moves to dismiss case based on “literal truth”
https://x.com/macfarlanenews/status/1983992383458230645?s=46 |
|
Date: November 3rd, 2025 6:18 PM Author: vibrant national security agency cons do you think this will work?
https://x.com/rparloff/status/1985480050142060880?s=46 |
|
Date: November 4th, 2025 10:05 AM Author: filthy indecent parlour hairy legs Where is this issue addressed in comey’s mtd? I’m most interested in this. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5787602&forum_id=2#49400632) |
|
Date: November 3rd, 2025 9:47 PM Author: sexy apoplectic church building DOJ responds. turns out that Comey used Richman to leak leak leak. my speculation on xoxo was that Comey would get this dismissed pre-trial because the questions and answers are somewhat vague. we'll see.
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/71459120/138/united-states-v-comey/ |
|
Date: November 3rd, 2025 10:24 PM Author: vibrant national security agency it’s not illegal to leak information to the press. That’s why he wasn’t charged for leaking. unless they have him on lying (they don’t) then they have nothing. and none of this even impacts the prnding pretrial motions to dismiss for selective/vindictive prosecution. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5787602&forum_id=2#49399624) |
|
Date: November 3rd, 2025 10:35 PM Author: sexy apoplectic church building my overriding concern is that Comey be exposed for who he is. This opposition brief helps. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5787602&forum_id=2#49399668) |
|
Date: November 3rd, 2025 10:37 PM Author: vibrant national security agency why don’t you like Comey? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5787602&forum_id=2#49399674) |
|
Date: November 3rd, 2025 10:47 PM Author: sexy apoplectic church building lying POS who put politics ahead of duty (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5787602&forum_id=2#49399711) |
|
Date: November 4th, 2025 9:43 AM Author: talented chartreuse private investor (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5787602&forum_id=2#49400579) |
|
Date: November 3rd, 2025 10:37 PM Author: Godawful Laughsome Selfie Mad-dog Skullcap Espionage Act (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5787602&forum_id=2#49399673) |
|
Date: November 3rd, 2025 11:28 PM Author: Topaz zippy round eye Espionage Act only makes it illegal to disclosed "National Security" information, which is clearly defined in the statute.
The charge against Comey is that he lied to Congress about authorizing someone to disclose information about the Clinton Investigation to the Press.
Not, did Comey leak memos about Trump trying to force him to drop the Flynn investigation.
|
|
Date: November 4th, 2025 1:29 PM Author: Godawful Laughsome Selfie Mad-dog Skullcap I assumed it was like that, but I just glanced at their brief and they aren't even saying the info he leaked was (or should have been) classified. I looked at the "gotcha" emails and it's just Comey telling people the exact same shit he was telling the public. WTF is this? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5787602&forum_id=2#49401296) |
|
Date: November 3rd, 2025 10:38 PM Author: Adventurous startled resort boiling water Not a lawyer here and only scored top 4% on the LSAT. Was Comey's case dismissed? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5787602&forum_id=2#49399675) |
|
Date: November 3rd, 2025 10:47 PM Author: sexy apoplectic church building motion pending ...
|
|
Date: November 4th, 2025 9:19 AM Author: vibrant national security agency DOJ was given until yesterday to file its response. As expected their response was very weak. I bet we’ll have a dismissal before Thanksgiving. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5787602&forum_id=2#49400521) |
|
Date: November 4th, 2025 9:46 AM Author: filthy indecent parlour hairy legs Can you poast their response? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5787602&forum_id=2#49400588) |
|
Date: November 4th, 2025 9:54 AM Author: sexy apoplectic church building https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/71459120/138/united-states-v-comey/ (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5787602&forum_id=2#49400605) |
|
Date: November 4th, 2025 1:33 PM Author: Godawful Laughsome Selfie Mad-dog Skullcap This is so bad. "This can't be vindictive because the POTUS had a preexisting duty to bring these charges under the Take Care Act" is a weak opening for your legal arguments.
I can't even figure out what they're accusing him of. "Unauthorized disclosures?" He's the goddamn FBI director, and if he was obligated to ask anyone it was the Attorney General, wasn't it? |
|
Date: November 4th, 2025 1:35 PM Author: sexy apoplectic church building this isn't my area of law. but what is the precedent for where there is a political incentive to bring the claims but there is also probable cause to believe a crime was committed? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5787602&forum_id=2#49401312) |
|
Date: November 4th, 2025 3:35 PM Author: Godawful Laughsome Selfie Mad-dog Skullcap why would he have a political incentive to accuse Hillary of a crime? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5787602&forum_id=2#49401600) |
|
Date: November 4th, 2025 9:56 AM Author: histrionic ungodly mother as the libpumo i know you're immune to experience shame or self-reflection after being proven wrong over and over again; but do you have any idea how rare it is for an indictment to be dismissed? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5787602&forum_id=2#49400608) |
|
Date: November 3rd, 2025 11:14 PM Author: hilarious provocative business firm He’s completely fucked
https://x.com/mrddmia/status/1985465412176232653?s=46 |
|
Date: November 3rd, 2025 11:19 PM Author: sexy apoplectic church building what does that handwriting say? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5787602&forum_id=2#49399790) |
|
Date: November 3rd, 2025 11:54 PM Author: transparent cerebral codepig market it says "RICO STATUTES APPLY" (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5787602&forum_id=2#49399862) |
|
Date: November 4th, 2025 9:28 AM Author: Charismatic twinkling uncleanness He says Russiahoax is a Hillary Clinton campaign op to tie Trump to Russia. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5787602&forum_id=2#49400542) |
|
Date: November 4th, 2025 9:17 AM Author: vibrant national security agency um which part of that shows he lied to Congress? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5787602&forum_id=2#49400517) |
|
Date: November 4th, 2025 9:31 AM Author: sexy apoplectic church building as i understand it the focus is more on the question asked than the answer Comey gave.
we can now plainly see what we deeply suspected: Comey was a nearly non-stop leaker to the NYT and especially to Michael Schmidt (who was a lackey). Comey's mouthpiece was a Columbia Law professor named Richman who became a special employee of the FBI basically so Comey could leak through Richman.
if the questions posed to Comey are construed as "did you authorize any leaks?" then Comey plainly lied. Comey authorized leak after leak and used Richman to do them. but if the question is construed more narrowly (which is plausible, frankly) then Comey might not have lied. |
|
Date: November 4th, 2025 9:24 AM Author: Burgundy nibblets oh uh libs what did the retarded antifa pumo's OP say? "pepper thy Angus shitlibs"? |
|
Date: November 4th, 2025 9:27 AM Author: vibrant national security agency how does this show Comey lied to Congress? You guys keep avoiding the question. This was a weak response by DOJ and I think the motion to dismiss gets granted before November is over (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5787602&forum_id=2#49400539) |
|
Date: November 4th, 2025 9:27 AM Author: Burgundy nibblets uh oh libs (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5787602&forum_id=2#49400540) |
|
Date: November 4th, 2025 9:31 AM Author: vibrant national security agency alright we’ll see if your Comey prediction pans out better than your Mamdani prediction. think you can go 0 for 2 in the same month? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5787602&forum_id=2#49400550) |
|
Date: November 4th, 2025 9:33 AM Author: Burgundy nibblets lol you sound mad as fuck, retard (this is the retarded antifa tranny pumo that changes its moniker every hour and that probably doxxed Charles to CNN) |
|
Date: November 4th, 2025 9:37 AM Author: vibrant national security agency 👍 (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5787602&forum_id=2#49400564) |
|
Date: November 4th, 2025 9:33 AM Author: histrionic ungodly mother my reaction to the comey indictment was that trump should pardon him or extend an olive branch in some way to put an end to tit for tat political prosecutions.
but ljl now i can see why they didn't. didn't think they'd have such damning evidence. lol @ libs. |
|
Date: November 4th, 2025 9:44 AM Author: sexy apoplectic church building the man Comey was leaking to is the husband of Nicole Wallace (MSNBC). FBI-NYT-MSNBC (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5787602&forum_id=2#49400582) |
|
Date: November 4th, 2025 9:58 AM Author: vibrant national security agency sounds like he’s guilty (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5787602&forum_id=2#49400613) |
|
Date: November 4th, 2025 11:56 AM Author: charcoal razzle den Yeah long prison term is in his future (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5787602&forum_id=2#49400991) |
|
Date: November 4th, 2025 9:27 AM Author: sexy apoplectic church building Comey's fake email name on his secret account was "Reinhold Niebuhr," lol. Comey thinks so much of himself. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5787602&forum_id=2#49400541) |
|
Date: November 4th, 2025 9:32 AM Author: vibrant national security agency sounds like he’s guilty (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5787602&forum_id=2#49400555) |
|
Date: November 4th, 2025 9:34 AM Author: Burgundy nibblets (this is the retarded antifa tranny pumo that changes its moniker every hour and that probably doxxed Charles to CNN) (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5787602&forum_id=2#49400560) |
|
Date: November 4th, 2025 9:36 AM Author: sexy apoplectic church building i haven't changed my prediction much. i had Comey's odds of winning pretrial at like 90-95% unless there was a hidden bombshell that DOJ would reveal. although these new documents utterly tarnish the man (and make the NYT look like scum) they are not quite a bombshell. i'd put the odds of a pretrial win at 66%, mostly because the questions posed to Comey might be interpreted in various ways. but i am glad the truth is finally coming out. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5787602&forum_id=2#49400563) |
|
Date: November 4th, 2025 9:38 AM Author: vibrant national security agency how do they tarnish the man or make NYT look like scum? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5787602&forum_id=2#49400569) |
|
Date: November 4th, 2025 9:42 AM Author: sexy apoplectic church building lol. ask Nicole Wallace and Michael Schmidt. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5787602&forum_id=2#49400574) |
|
Date: November 4th, 2025 9:43 AM Author: vibrant national security agency you guys are really shitty at this (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5787602&forum_id=2#49400578) |
|
Date: November 4th, 2025 9:47 AM Author: histrionic ungodly mother the libpumo is having a really manic tuesday morning (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5787602&forum_id=2#49400592) |
|
Date: November 4th, 2025 9:52 AM Author: Charismatic twinkling uncleanness he's really spazzing out today
|
|
Date: November 4th, 2025 9:57 AM Author: vibrant national security agency you guys are hilariously bad at this stuff (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5787602&forum_id=2#49400610) |
|
Date: November 4th, 2025 10:00 AM Author: histrionic ungodly mother scoreboard
trump is potus and won all swing states and the popular vote. gop control every branch of government. if this is hilariously bad, what does that make the libs? |
|
Date: November 4th, 2025 10:04 AM Author: vibrant national security agency I meant at lawyering. you’re obviously much better at stealing elections than the democrats (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5787602&forum_id=2#49400631) |
|
Date: November 4th, 2025 11:49 AM Author: vibrant national security agency Sounds like the DOJ is trying to pull some shenanigans in the related Halligan disqualification case, judge not having it
https://x.com/meiselasb/status/1985751848595394924?s=46 |
|
Date: November 4th, 2025 6:45 PM Author: sexy apoplectic church building Megyn Kelly breaks down why the Comey testimony to Grassley was clearly perjury. the statute has run on that. so Cruz asked a question to Comey to try to get Comey to reiterate the perjury. unfortunately Cruz then interjects an McCabe issue. but Comey says "mine is the same today." which might literally mean "my testimony is the same today as it was before Grassley." but Cruz's poor technique muddies the water.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bg9jfVsL8HI |
|
Date: November 5th, 2025 11:06 AM Author: vibrant national security agency Cons sounds like this is going great
https://x.com/kyledcheney/status/1986101320479330510?s=46 |
|
Date: November 6th, 2025 8:50 AM Author: vibrant national security agency oops
https://x.com/emptywheel/status/1986212465814773903?s=46
https://x.com/rparloff/status/1986422743097540774?s=46 |
|
Date: November 13th, 2025 2:41 PM Author: vibrant national security agency https://x.com/rparloff/status/1989007917299740681?s=46 (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5787602&forum_id=2#49427148) |
|
Date: November 13th, 2025 10:32 AM Author: vibrant national security agency https://x.com/abc/status/1988650656710758713?s=46
https://abcnews.go.com/US/watchdog-group-files-bar-complaint-prosecutor-lindsey-halligan/story? |
|
Date: November 13th, 2025 10:33 AM Author: vibrant national security agency Cons would you say this is going well so far?
https://x.com/kyledcheney/status/1988967650823754207?s=46 |
|
Date: November 13th, 2025 11:14 AM Author: talented chartreuse private investor I don't expect anything significant to come of it. He's a shithead rat though so I'm happy he's being further exposed. In the off chance he actually catches a conviction then 180 million. Must be a fun case. So yeah, going great. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5787602&forum_id=2#49426400) |
|
Date: November 13th, 2025 11:24 AM Author: vibrant national security agency nothing significant?
https://x.com/kyledcheney/status/1989005810534609383?s=46 |
|
Date: November 13th, 2025 11:29 AM Author: talented chartreuse private investor Well there is his vindication right there! I stand corrected good sir. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5787602&forum_id=2#49426434) |
|
Date: November 13th, 2025 11:46 AM Author: mischievous ticket booth I'm innocent of a crime, because the prosecuting attorney didn't have some paper signed? That seems like a really good argument. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5787602&forum_id=2#49426485) |
|
Date: November 13th, 2025 1:07 PM Author: vibrant national security agency Not only that, but there was no crime! (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5787602&forum_id=2#49426773) |
|
Date: November 13th, 2025 11:32 AM Author: disgusting national athletic conference This one is win win for me. I’d love to see Comey in jail, and I always love to see Donny boy fail. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5787602&forum_id=2#49426445) |
|
Date: November 17th, 2025 11:04 AM Author: vibrant national security agency cons is this bad?
https://x.com/kyledcheney/status/1990450221642621320?s=46 |
|
Date: November 19th, 2025 12:14 PM Author: vibrant national security agency lol Haligan never even got an indictment
https://x.com/krassenstein/status/1991185424790790298?s=46
https://www.cnn.com/politics/live-news/james-comey-doj-case-hearing-11-19-25? |