The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
|
 |
 
|
Bidding on firms that have had massive layoffs: retarded?
| Heady Market Corn Cake | 07/01/09 |
| motley tank | 07/01/09 |
| Heady Market Corn Cake | 07/01/09 |
| Pungent sable stage | 07/01/09 |
| bright resort double fault | 07/01/09 |
| high-end claret goyim field | 07/01/09 |
| shimmering dilemma | 07/01/09 |
| Pungent sable stage | 07/01/09 |
| Pungent sable stage | 07/01/09 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: July 1st, 2009 2:55 AM Author: Heady Market Corn Cake I'm confused about this. I know the conventional wisdom is fuck latham, etc., but are these firms really more likely to bone next yrs summers than firms that are just doing stealth layoffs and salary freezes right now? Seems like they wouldnt need to bring another wave and new summers would be safe. or am i retarded? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1031289&forum_id=2#12130895) |
 |
Date: July 1st, 2009 3:34 AM Author: motley tank you have an ethical duty to support firms that treated their associates well. otherwise we're all fucked. stay very, very, very far away from latham. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1031289&forum_id=2#12130975) |
|
Date: July 1st, 2009 3:54 AM Author: Heady Market Corn Cake makes sense. ty (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1031289&forum_id=2#12130996) |
|
Date: July 1st, 2009 12:37 PM Author: Pungent sable stage given latham's behavior in the 90s and their behavior now, they've demonstrated that they'll fuck you over at the first sign of trouble. peer firms are biting the bullet instead of laying people off. so, do you want to be at a firm that fucks over first years at the first sign of trouble, or do you want a firm that's going to honor its commitment to you? NY cleared out 45% of associates accross all class levels. they by no means needed to do that to survive.
that said, if latham is all you can get, take it. but if you can go to gibson, or any good firm that doesn't screw over its associates, then do that.
and don't think you're safe just because they've cleaned house alread. this financial mess could take years to unwind and that could mean more layoffs down the line. just ask any junior associate at Latham NY or LA how safe they feel right now. that should answer your question.
hth. |
Date: July 1st, 2009 4:54 AM Author: bright resort double fault uh, I think it makes sense because these firms are a lot less likely to hire you in the first place (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1031289&forum_id=2#12131057) |
|
Date: July 1st, 2009 7:36 AM Author: high-end claret goyim field I think this is actually a very good idea. Firms that have done massive purges of associates are probably less likely to have further layoffs and deferrals. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1031289&forum_id=2#12131120) |
|
Date: July 1st, 2009 12:19 PM Author: shimmering dilemma this is dangerous thinking. If crappy firms can treat associates like shit with impunity, then all firms will begin to treat associates like those firms do. the only reason we attorneys are as fortunate as we are is because our ability to vote with our feet and shun firms that act like Latham. You must do your part, just as we will all do ours.
On a more individual level, though, it really isn't an issue of whether firms will have cut enough to survive. It's an issue of firm culture and mentality. If a firm views associates as commodities, you'll be worse off in good times and in bad. |
|
Date: July 1st, 2009 12:39 PM Author: Pungent sable stage and latham now has multiple data points where they've treated firms like shit. multiple recruiters have told me that this is just what latham does, citing their past mass layoffs. they did it to a shit load of people and they'll do it to you. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1031289&forum_id=2#12132353) |
|
Date: July 1st, 2009 12:38 PM Author: Pungent sable stage see above (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1031289&forum_id=2#12132347) |