California to deploy observers to observe DOJ observers for Nov. election (link)
| we are definitely claiming fraud trumpmos | 10/27/25 | | excellent subthread | 10/27/25 | | we are definitely claiming fraud trumpmos | 10/27/25 | | ,.,.,:,,:,..,:::,...,:,.,.:...:.,:.:: | 10/27/25 | | I have no jawline and I must poast | 10/27/25 | | ...,.,..,..,..,.,.,.,.,.,,,,..,.,.,,. | 10/27/25 | | necrons | 10/28/25 | | I have no jawline and I must poast | 10/27/25 | | sizzle chest | 10/27/25 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: October 27th, 2025 11:32 PM
Author: ,.,.,:,,:,..,:::,...,:,.,.:...:.,:.::
who observes the observers of the observers
the eternal question
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5790672&forum_id=2#49381106) |
 |
Date: October 27th, 2025 11:39 PM
Author: ...,.,..,..,..,.,.,.,.,.,,,,..,.,.,,.
Trump responded by saying he would send a team of observers and National Guard troops to observe the California observers who intend to observe federal observers.
"These observers of observers will observe the so-called observers sent by failed governor Gavin Newsom," Trump said.
"We will not let these observers interfere with federal observation of these already stolen and fraudulent elections," he added.
http://nytimes.com/nation/politics/trump-sending-observers-of-observers.htm
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5790672&forum_id=2#49381122) |
Date: October 27th, 2025 11:37 PM Author: I have no jawline and I must poast
Fuck it I had AI do it
Thought for 7sBreaking: Federal Watchdogs Assigned to Oversee California's Watchers Watching DOJ's Election Monitors in Golden State
Byline: Jasper Quill, Senior Conspiracy Correspondent
Dateline: Sacramento, CA – October 28, 2025
In a move that has election integrity advocates scratching their heads and reaching for more binoculars, the U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) announced today the deployment of a new cadre of "meta-observers" tasked with monitoring the observers who are already monitoring the Department of Justice's (DOJ) observers at polling stations across California for the upcoming November elections.
The announcement comes amid heightened scrutiny over the integrity of the state's voting process, which includes gubernatorial runoffs, local ballot measures on everything from avocado tariffs to mandatory surf lessons, and a controversial proposition to rename the state "Califlorida" for tourism purposes. But with layers of oversight piling up like a bureaucratic onion, experts warn that the real threat to democracy might be observer fatigue.
"This is about ensuring transparency at every level," said DHS spokesperson Elena Vigil in a press conference held via Zoom from an undisclosed location—possibly a bunker stocked with energy drinks and clipboards. "We've got DOJ observers watching the polls. Then California's state election board has their own observers watching those DOJ folks to make sure they're not, you know, observing too intensely. Now, we're stepping in to watch the watchers of the watchers. It's like a Russian nesting doll, but with more clipboards and fewer matryoshkas."
The DOJ's initial deployment of observers was part of a routine federal effort to monitor compliance with voting rights laws, particularly in counties with histories of long lines, confusing ballots, and suspiciously high turnout among celebrity voters. California responded by mobilizing its own team of state-certified "integrity enforcers," complete with neon vests emblazoned with "I'm Watching You Watching Them." These enforcers have been spotted lurking in the shadows of polling places, taking notes on the DOJ agents' note-taking habits.
Enter the DHS meta-observers: a elite squad of 500 highly trained professionals, many of whom are former mall security guards with advanced degrees in "suspicious loitering detection." Equipped with state-of-the-art surveillance gear—including drones disguised as seagulls and smart glasses that detect excessive blinking—these new overseers will fan out across key battleground counties like Los Angeles, San Francisco, and that one weird suburb where everyone votes by interpretive dance.
Critics, however, are crying foul, arguing that this escalating game of observational one-upmanship could lead to chaos. "At what point do we deploy observers to watch the meta-observers?" asked Dr. Helena Scope, a political science professor at UC Berkeley and author of The Infinite Gaze: How Over-Oversight Killed the Cat. "We're one step away from needing quantum physicists to monitor the uncertainty principle in voter turnout."
Election officials in California remain unfazed. Governor Elena Ramirez, in a statement released while she was reportedly observing her own press secretary, said: "California leads the nation in innovation, and that includes innovative ways to make sure everyone's watching everyone else. If this keeps up, we'll have enough observers to form their own political party by 2026."
Meanwhile, grassroots groups like the Citizens for Unobserved Voting have launched petitions demanding an end to the madness. "We just want to vote without feeling like we're in a spy thriller," said activist Marco Peep. "Last election, I had three people staring at me while I filled out my ballot. It was like trying to eat a burrito in a hall of mirrors."
As November approaches, rumors swirl of even more layers: whispers in Washington suggest the FBI might soon assign "ultra-meta-observers" to keep tabs on the DHS team. And in a bizarre twist, international observers from the United Nations have expressed interest in monitoring the entire spectacle, potentially turning California's elections into a global meta-event.
For now, voters are advised to bring extra patience—and perhaps a pair of sunglasses—to shield themselves from the glare of all those watchful eyes. After all, in the Golden State, the only thing more Californian than sunshine is suspicion.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5790672&forum_id=2#49381118) |
|
|