The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
|
 |
 
|
To the cucks and others who think any other Republican would crush Hillary
Poast new message in this thread
Date: October 20th, 2016 12:50 AM Author: Idiotic church building indirect expression Look no further than the media's collective burial of the O'Keefe tapes showing the Dems paid for literal brownshirts to cause violence at Trump's rallies.
I bet many of you guys would think "This is it! The media can't ignore this. This is the thing that will sink Hillary and turn things around."
But you'd be 100% wrong. The media is ignoring it. And when they're not, when they actually mention it at all, it's to claim it's fake and edited--even though there's many long uninterrupted stretches in the videos that simply could not have been edited into how they sound. Not to mention that people have been punished over the video. Hillary couldn't even really address it when Trump raised the issue.
How does any candidate win against this? You've got corruption out the ass in the Wikileaks emails and the media won't cover it. You've got Hillary hiring literal brownshirts to instigate violence and the media won't cover it. And if they'll hire people to commit violence, I'm sure at least a few of the groping accusers are being paid as well.
How does any candidate beat that? Yeah, Cruz is a better debater and cleaner, but they would've sent their brownshirts to his rallies, they would've had women accusing him of sexual assault, etc. There'd be more sleaze against Rubio or Kasich.
How can someone win against that, when one side is free to use the most fascist, straight-up Orwellian tactics and the media won't report on that or their criminal activities, but will spend days on any stupid thing the other candidate says?
Trump is right. This is rigged. Not by voter fraud, but by one side being free to engage in 1984-esque behavior and have an unstoppable juggernaut of a propaganda machine in the media to back them up.
So at the very least, recognize this, instead of buying into yet more media flame and thinking your chosen GOP candidate would easily beat Hillary. They wouldn't.
|
Date: October 20th, 2016 12:52 AM Author: Elite chocolate hominid The likes of Rubio and Kasich have too much overlap with Clinton to get hit that hard. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3392930&forum_id=2#31686151) |
 |
Date: October 20th, 2016 12:55 AM Author: Idiotic church building indirect expression Lol absolutely not. It's about the SCOTUS picks, so these candidates would get absolutely decimated.
Look at how the media ran with Romney's "binders of women" comment. They would find things and blow them up, while giving a free pass to everything Hillary did.
For example, if Rubio was up there tonight, in a parallel universe every single media outlet would be running with the headline: Rubio guarantees Roe v. Wade will be overturned under his presidency, or some other tactic. There is no beating this. |
|
Date: October 20th, 2016 1:04 AM Author: Elite chocolate hominid The Romney stuff is bad but it's nowhere near the bizarro cartoon carnival the last year or so has been. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3392930&forum_id=2#31686226) |
|
Date: October 20th, 2016 12:57 AM Author: mint parlour faggot firefighter I've said it a number of times recently: you can't beat the left with leftist tactics. The left, at it's core, is only about being anti-white, anti-Christian, and winning by whatever means necessary. It does not care about honor or honesty; it uses those concepts against the right solely to bludgeon it. That's why you can't shame the left by exposing it to whatever foul play it's currently engaged in. To them, the end ("social justice") justifies the means.
The right cannot win incrementally. It can only win by a singular fell swoop, such as a military coup purging all institutions at once. |
|
Date: October 20th, 2016 1:10 AM Author: Idiotic church building indirect expression Not sure if you read XO Ted's manifesto, but he engages in the best discussion of liberal psychology that I've encountered in one place. He'd agree with much of your first paragraph.
But I can't see a military coup purging academia and the media (including both "news" outlets and entertainment), which are the main conduits for these tactics to be spread to the masses. |
|
Date: October 20th, 2016 1:13 AM Author: mint parlour faggot firefighter Look to Egypt to how it's done. Either the military controls the media, or the media controls the military. It's either/or. The country went from Mubarrak/military in control, to Muslim Brotherhood/media in control, back to El Sisi/military. El Sisi arrested journalists, expelled foreign non-profits, etc. Now they need his approval for articles.
We're very far from a military coup, though. |
|
Date: October 20th, 2016 1:16 AM Author: Idiotic church building indirect expression I think the media has so thoroughly brainwashed people, especially the millennials, that even if a military coup happened, too many people would flip their shit and wouldn't accept it.
I honestly have no idea what can be done, apart from trying to get cucks to fucking wake up and stop listening to the fucking media. |
|
Date: October 20th, 2016 1:25 AM Author: magenta stimulating idea he suggested you guys should move to new zealand.
if i honest to god thought a trump loss would result in the collapse of america, that's where i would move. |
|
Date: October 20th, 2016 1:28 AM Author: mint parlour faggot firefighter I think about NZ specifically. But hard to move with family + work here. Also if there's any collapse, unless you've been somewhere 10+ years they will steal your shit first as a new import. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3392930&forum_id=2#31686358) |
|
Date: October 20th, 2016 1:29 AM Author: Idiotic church building indirect expression Pretty sure no other country in the world has America's freedoms, namely a strong Second Amendment as a safeguard against government tyranny and actual freedom of speech without a "hate speech" exception. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3392930&forum_id=2#31686369) |
|
Date: October 20th, 2016 1:30 AM Author: mint parlour faggot firefighter But NZ will probably be out of the radiation fallout zone when Hillary starts a nuclear war with Russia. And the supreme court under Hillary will eviscerate the 1st and 2nd amendments. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3392930&forum_id=2#31686373) |
|
Date: October 20th, 2016 1:32 AM Author: Idiotic church building indirect expression True lol. But remember the other thread a while back where I said I'd think about moving to Australia, and you told me why that wasn't well thought out? You were right, though I forget the reasons.
Isn't NZ essentially a clone of Australia? |
|
Date: October 20th, 2016 1:33 AM Author: magenta stimulating idea he suggested nz is a clone of australia but small enough and far away enough that it is ignored by the rest of the world. it's a great place to go and be forgotten while living in a culture that is similar to america's. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3392930&forum_id=2#31686398) |
|
Date: October 20th, 2016 1:34 AM Author: mint parlour faggot firefighter Yeah, NZ has no 1st or 2nd amendments, and it has growing Muslim populations and the same white liberal guilt you have everywhere. so it sucks. But it's out of the nuclear fallout zones (NZ isn't a threat militarily + it's in southern hemisphere), it's still mostly white, and it grows a lot of food in case of massive disruption to international trade (although it imports pretty much everything non-agriculture). Also NZ has no nuclear power plants which is a plus. south island is the place to be.
australia is the same as NZ except with a much bigger population (6x as large), with much less agriculture production or ability to be self sustaining. |
|
Date: October 20th, 2016 1:40 AM Author: Idiotic church building indirect expression May be a safe haven for the rest of our lifetimes if shit really goes down here. But it sounds like our kids would be screwed in the future even there. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3392930&forum_id=2#31686441) |
|
Date: October 20th, 2016 1:41 AM Author: mint parlour faggot firefighter in the event shit hits the fan, new transplants will be robbed and murdered first wherever you go. so going there when things get really bad will be too late. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3392930&forum_id=2#31686446) |
|
Date: October 20th, 2016 1:48 AM Author: Idiotic church building indirect expression Good points. Something to seriously consider. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3392930&forum_id=2#31686485) |
|
Date: October 20th, 2016 10:37 AM Author: carnelian aphrodisiac national Tbf, if you're white in a large U.S. city you'll be robbed and murdered even faster by nigs or spics when the rule of law collapses (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3392930&forum_id=2#31687674) |
|
Date: October 20th, 2016 1:32 AM Author: magenta stimulating idea he suggested you are delusional if you think the 2nd amendment is keeping the government in check. there are many countries with widespread gun ownership where the government simply tramples all over the people--iraq is a notable example. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3392930&forum_id=2#31686386) |
|
Date: October 20th, 2016 1:33 AM Author: Idiotic church building indirect expression It isn't, but it is one of the few true safeguards that people have to keep shit from really hitting the fan. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3392930&forum_id=2#31686395) |
|
Date: October 20th, 2016 1:36 AM Author: Idiotic church building indirect expression To address your edit about Iraq, this link claims that Iraq only allowed civilians to keep guns in their home starting in 2012. That is not a comparable example.
http://www.deseretnews.com/top/2519/9/Iraq-15-nations-with-the-highest-gun-ownership.html
Plus, now they are not really a functioning state, considering ISIS's influence. |
|
Date: October 20th, 2016 1:40 AM Author: magenta stimulating idea he suggested iraq had shit tons of guns in the hands of locals under saddam. here's the nyt prior to the invasion:
"One gauge of that fear is the trade at gun shops. Most Iraqi households own at least one gun, so there has been no particular run on armaments. But some gun shop owners report as much as a 50 percent jump in ammunition sales."
http://www.nytimes.com/2003/03/12/world/threats-responses-iraq-sandbags-already-streets-baghdad-city-waiting.html |
|
Date: October 20th, 2016 1:46 AM Author: Idiotic church building indirect expression Hmmm, well I wouldn't deny that Iraq had a tyrannical government under Saddam, so I can't really explain how guns in the hands of locals apparently did not have an impact on this. Maybe cultural differences?
Also, off topic but did you catch this from your article:
"Some of the nervousness stems from the landscape, with sandbagged positions springing up around government ministries and major intersections. Some comes from superstition -- the women who read fortunes in coffee cup grounds have found in them the prophecy of a March 15 start to the war."
The war started on March 20, so the coffee cup ground prophecies weren't too far off. |
|
Date: October 20th, 2016 1:51 AM Author: magenta stimulating idea he suggested probabilistically, the coffee cup ground prediction was not too surprising as the iraqis knew the invasion was imminent.
the hilarious thing is the lady used coffee grounds to predict the future. |
|
Date: October 20th, 2016 12:58 AM Author: laughsome whorehouse preventive strike ITT: impotent cumskin rage (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3392930&forum_id=2#31686184) |
|
Date: October 20th, 2016 1:16 AM Author: Glittery rigor In what context? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3392930&forum_id=2#31686293) |
|
Date: October 20th, 2016 12:59 AM Author: Hairless locus athletic conference the only cucks in this election are the SPS trash Trumptards. he could literally do anything and you and the rest of your cocksucking crew would continue eating all his shit. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3392930&forum_id=2#31686201) |
|
Date: October 20th, 2016 1:08 AM Author: Startled zippy cuckoldry keepsake machete (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3392930&forum_id=2#31686248) |
|
Date: October 20th, 2016 1:11 AM Author: cracking painfully honest main people Oh the irony of festering libs saying this (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3392930&forum_id=2#31686265) |
|
Date: October 20th, 2016 9:43 AM Author: floppy stag film famous landscape painting (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3392930&forum_id=2#31687404) |
|
Date: October 20th, 2016 9:37 AM Author: Talented karate (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3392930&forum_id=2#31687372) |
|
Date: October 20th, 2016 1:02 AM Author: Violet Contagious Newt Fat Ankles idk about crushing her, but in head-to-head polling Kasich was beating her soundly and Rubio to a lesser extent too. we'd be talking about wikileaks and how shitty Hillary is rather than the orange assclown. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3392930&forum_id=2#31686220) |
|
Date: October 20th, 2016 1:03 AM Author: Idiotic church building indirect expression No we wouldn't. Guess you missed the entire point of the OP. We'd all be talking about some position they held that was in conflict with the majority of voters (such as anti-abortion) along with several manufactured controversies. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3392930&forum_id=2#31686224) |
|
Date: October 20th, 2016 1:06 AM Author: Violet Contagious Newt Fat Ankles your OP glaringly failed to have any semblance of context re the difference between Trump supporters vs. Kasich or Rubio supporters (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3392930&forum_id=2#31686240) |
|
Date: October 20th, 2016 1:06 AM Author: mint parlour faggot firefighter (whoosh) (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3392930&forum_id=2#31686242) |
|
Date: October 20th, 2016 1:16 AM Author: Lilac University Rigpig (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3392930&forum_id=2#31686290) |
|
Date: October 20th, 2016 1:16 AM Author: Glittery rigor The russians would never have released those documents if not for trump in the first place , and bernie wouldn't have stayed in if not for the 'contested convention' outsider narrative that Trump had giving him hope. All of Bernie's issues like trade, wall street, etc. would've been ignored like they were for obama-hillary in 2008.
Anyway, the only who was leading Hillary in all swing states was Kasich. |
|
Date: October 20th, 2016 1:23 AM Author: Violet Contagious Newt Fat Ankles nah, the Russians would have released them bc they have a hard-on for Obama and Hillary. they want an end to the U.S.-led sanctions and for all the talk about how soft they are, Obama and Hillary have fucked shit up for the Russian economy.
Kasich was leading in all swing states and that was before more shit came out about Hillary. i think he would have won and if the primary goal was to defeat Hillary, voting in Trump as the nominee was asinine. |
|
Date: October 20th, 2016 1:25 AM Author: cracking painfully honest main people Except Trump was the DNC and the media's own creation. There is no possible way he would be the nominee without them coordinating and putting him on 24/7 (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3392930&forum_id=2#31686335) |
|
Date: October 20th, 2016 1:26 AM Author: Glittery rigor The media attention was almost all negative, they were against him. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3392930&forum_id=2#31686342) |
|
Date: October 20th, 2016 1:31 AM Author: cracking painfully honest main people Except they sat on a bomb a month before the election. They knew exactly what they were doing. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3392930&forum_id=2#31686379) |
|
Date: October 20th, 2016 1:34 AM Author: Glittery rigor Then why didn't Billy Bush report it back last summer to Jeb? He didn't remember until way later. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3392930&forum_id=2#31686401) |
|
Date: October 20th, 2016 1:43 AM Author: cracking painfully honest main people Because he didn't want to lose his job. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3392930&forum_id=2#31686458) |
|
Date: October 20th, 2016 1:48 AM Author: Glittery rigor So what's this about a media conspiracy then?
The media itself didn't even know it existed until Billy blabbed about it over the summer.
Billy probably didn't even remember until Trump attacked Khan's wife. |
|
Date: October 20th, 2016 1:49 AM Author: cracking painfully honest main people Utterly false (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3392930&forum_id=2#31686490) |
|
Date: October 20th, 2016 1:50 AM Author: Glittery rigor What's false about it?
No one knew about it until Billy Bush talked about it in Rio according to every possible insider source, or are you now embracing Trump-tier conspiracy theories about the media? |
|
Date: October 20th, 2016 2:01 AM Author: cracking painfully honest main people Who found the tapes? Why did they wait on it a month before the election? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3392930&forum_id=2#31686551) |
|
Date: October 20th, 2016 2:03 AM Author: Glittery rigor It was found by nbc staffers after trump talked about machado, before that, they weren't thinking about it at all. Like I said, they didn't know about it, that's no reports of awareness of the secret tape existing before Billy Bush's comments in the summer. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3392930&forum_id=2#31686560) |
|
Date: October 20th, 2016 2:06 AM Author: cracking painfully honest main people Unbelievably false. LJL (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3392930&forum_id=2#31686571) |
|
Date: October 20th, 2016 2:09 AM Author: Glittery rigor not false, you can go look at the media reports for yourself, there is not a single person saying that they were aware of the tape until Billy Bush's comments in the summer. So even then, it shows you that no one knew about it until after the convention anyway, what difference would it have made had the tape been released in August rather than October? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3392930&forum_id=2#31686578) |
|
Date: October 20th, 2016 2:09 AM Author: Insecure vivacious knife coldplay fan Let's dispel with this fiction (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3392930&forum_id=2#31686574) |
|
Date: October 20th, 2016 1:28 AM Author: Glittery rigor The other republicans are even more anti-russian, there would be literally not a single reason for them to help anyone else, those documents wouldn't be released.
That's why the documents weren't released in the first place until the russians were sure that trump had secured the nomination at the convention. |
|
Date: October 20th, 2016 1:32 AM Author: Violet Contagious Newt Fat Ankles the documents were released when they thought it would be most timely to hurt Hillary, before the DNC, and just recently, weeks from election day and when she was starting to run away with it (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3392930&forum_id=2#31686391) |
|
Date: October 20th, 2016 1:35 AM Author: Glittery rigor Yes, and if the russians released anything at all, they would've also released anti-republican documents to counter any damage to Hillary.
But more likely, they simply would've released anti-republican documents, and ignored hillary's to help her out. |
|
Date: October 20th, 2016 1:35 AM Author: Violet Contagious Newt Fat Ankles bro, walk away from this one. you're losing bigly (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3392930&forum_id=2#31686411) |
|
Date: October 20th, 2016 1:36 AM Author: Glittery rigor How? Even Republican politicans say it's russian interference, why would russians intervene to help someone more anti-russian than hillary? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3392930&forum_id=2#31686417) |
|
Date: October 20th, 2016 1:28 AM Author: Startled zippy cuckoldry keepsake machete (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3392930&forum_id=2#31686362) |
|
Date: October 20th, 2016 1:30 AM Author: Glittery rigor Why did you bump that post? Are you a retard?
The russians didn't release them until they were sure that Trump had secured the nomination. |
|
Date: October 20th, 2016 1:34 AM Author: Maniacal Soggy Police Squad Kasich was rabidly anti russian. He was worse than Hillary. And in a fun twist, he was also rabidly anti china. There is a reason he was known as the WWW III candidate.
He was polling ahead for a while because no one really bothered to take out a pr hit on him. As soon as anyone put in even a half assed effort, he would be gone. |
|
Date: October 20th, 2016 1:39 AM Author: Violet Contagious Newt Fat Ankles lol i'm pretty sure that Putin regards actions more strongly than rhetoric. take a look at why he hates Obama and Hillary and maybe you'll understand. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3392930&forum_id=2#31686434) |
|
Date: October 20th, 2016 1:42 AM Author: Glittery rigor He hates republicans more, that's why he favored obama over romney in 2012 too.
http://www.the-american-interest.com/2012/09/11/obama-vs-romney-who-would-putin-pick/ |
|
Date: October 20th, 2016 1:47 AM Author: Violet Contagious Newt Fat Ankles lol i guarantee he doesn't feel the same way now (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3392930&forum_id=2#31686477) |
|
Date: October 20th, 2016 1:49 AM Author: Glittery rigor That's because of Trump, and nothing else. Like I said, otherwise, he would've put out just as much anti-republican leaks as anti-democratic leaks, or simply skipped the latter, and only put out anti-republican leaks if he did anything at all. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3392930&forum_id=2#31686488) |
|
Date: October 20th, 2016 1:53 AM Author: Startled zippy cuckoldry keepsake machete Or it could be because Obama sent his country into an economic death spiral in the ensuing 4 years (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3392930&forum_id=2#31686514) |
|
Date: October 20th, 2016 2:00 AM Author: Glittery rigor and all the republicans support even worse policies than obama, so why would he help them? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3392930&forum_id=2#31686544) |
|
Date: October 20th, 2016 1:54 AM Author: Violet Contagious Newt Fat Ankles why would he put out more anti-republican leaks? it's Obama and Hillary who fucked shit up for the Russian economy and let Putin know that he's not just going to walk all over Eastern Europe like the good old days. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3392930&forum_id=2#31686522) |
|
Date: October 20th, 2016 2:00 AM Author: Glittery rigor and the republicans want to fuck up the russian economy even more than Hillary, so why would he help them? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3392930&forum_id=2#31686547) |
|
Date: October 20th, 2016 1:42 AM Author: Maniacal Soggy Police Squad Putin will not support or help kasich. I saw him talking about russia during the debates. He was practically foaming at the mouth. He freaked me the fuck out. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3392930&forum_id=2#31686451) |
|
Date: October 20th, 2016 1:43 AM Author: Glittery rigor The only person putin would've helped besides trump is rand paul. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3392930&forum_id=2#31686456) |
|
Date: October 20th, 2016 1:47 AM Author: Maniacal Soggy Police Squad Agreed. And maybe Bernie, esp if it was bernie v kasich or bush. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3392930&forum_id=2#31686476) |
|
Date: October 20th, 2016 1:48 AM Author: Violet Contagious Newt Fat Ankles it's not about helping kasich. it's about defeating hillary. i don't think you realize how hated Obama/Hillary are in Russia bc if you did you'd have stopped itt a long time ago. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3392930&forum_id=2#31686483) |
|
Date: October 20th, 2016 1:51 AM Author: Glittery rigor He hates hillary/obama due to their russian policies, but the republicans are even worse on that front. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3392930&forum_id=2#31686506) |
|
Date: October 20th, 2016 1:54 AM Author: Startled zippy cuckoldry keepsake machete Putin loved GWB (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3392930&forum_id=2#31686517) |
|
Date: October 20th, 2016 2:01 AM Author: Glittery rigor Agreed, he wanted GWB over Gore, because Clinton/Gore was hostile to russia, while GWB was open to Putin and wanted to establish a good relationship with him. On the other hand, since Mccain '08 all the republican candidates besides Trump and the Pauls have been more anti-russian than the democratic candidates, so he's backed dem candidates since then. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3392930&forum_id=2#31686552) |
|
Date: October 20th, 2016 10:28 AM Author: Cocky Principal's Office lol at thinking Kasich would have won he had zero name rec |
|
Date: October 20th, 2016 1:49 AM Author: clear harsh meetinghouse coffee pot kasich literally went to the white house this week to help lobby in favor of the TPP. why THE FUCK would we want him in charge of anything, let alone the nation? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3392930&forum_id=2#31686486) |
|
Date: October 20th, 2016 1:15 AM Author: up-to-no-good station pozpig they caused violence by... making themselves available to frothing animalistic trumpmos? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3392930&forum_id=2#31686285) |
|
Date: October 20th, 2016 1:23 AM Author: kink-friendly piazza And the media wonders why Trump is hesitant about the actual vote being rigged?
I've never seen anything quite like the media's smear campaign against Trump, its efforts to protect Hillary, and the overall pervasiveness of Clinton's corruption.
|
|
Date: October 20th, 2016 1:27 AM Author: Violet Contagious Newt Fat Ankles isn't Fox News the most watched network? isn't talk radio dominated by anti-Hillary personalities? doesn't the internet provide a vast array of opinions? you people make it sound like Stalin's Russia. give it a rest already. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3392930&forum_id=2#31686353) |
|
Date: October 20th, 2016 1:29 AM Author: Out-of-control trump supporter lol, we're worse. at least in Russia, they tell you they're brainwashing you. Here, they lie about it (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3392930&forum_id=2#31686364) |
|
Date: October 20th, 2016 1:35 AM Author: Violet Contagious Newt Fat Ankles try harder (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3392930&forum_id=2#31686407) |
|
Date: October 20th, 2016 1:45 AM Author: cracking painfully honest main people Conservative media isn't as wretched and corrupt as the left wing media, which has a monopoly on the uninformed audience. HTH (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3392930&forum_id=2#31686469) |
|
Date: October 20th, 2016 1:50 AM Author: Violet Contagious Newt Fat Ankles yeah keep coming up with more bullshit and trying to move imaginary goalposts (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3392930&forum_id=2#31686500) |
|
Date: October 20th, 2016 1:57 AM Author: cracking painfully honest main people What's your IQ, bro? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3392930&forum_id=2#31686530) |
|
Date: October 20th, 2016 10:21 AM Author: Hairless locus athletic conference lol at a Trumptard questioning anyone's IQ (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3392930&forum_id=2#31687579) |
|
Date: October 20th, 2016 10:46 AM Author: carnelian aphrodisiac national (Retard) (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3392930&forum_id=2#31687721) |
|
Date: October 20th, 2016 1:28 AM Author: indecent galvanic sneaky criminal Trump>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Hillary>Cuckservatives. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3392930&forum_id=2#31686360) |
|
Date: October 20th, 2016 1:31 AM Author: Elite chocolate hominid (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3392930&forum_id=2#31686385) |
|
Date: October 20th, 2016 1:31 AM Author: Jet-lagged irradiated office cop (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3392930&forum_id=2#31686384) |
|
Date: October 20th, 2016 1:34 AM Author: Violet Contagious Newt Fat Ankles lol at u (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3392930&forum_id=2#31686400) |
|
Date: October 20th, 2016 10:27 AM Author: Idiotic church building indirect expression (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3392930&forum_id=2#31687608) |
|
Date: July 9th, 2020 8:04 PM Author: Idiotic church building indirect expression Very smart OP (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3392930&forum_id=2#40576754) |