Bidding on firms that have had massive layoffs: retarded?
| Alcoholic Talented Public Bath | 07/01/09 | | Stimulating yellow market | 07/01/09 | | Alcoholic Talented Public Bath | 07/01/09 | | Rusted bateful idea he suggested milk | 07/01/09 | | bipolar messiness kitty cat | 07/01/09 | | turquoise heaven stock car | 07/01/09 | | adventurous national security agency sneaky criminal | 07/01/09 | | Rusted bateful idea he suggested milk | 07/01/09 | | Rusted bateful idea he suggested milk | 07/01/09 |
Poast new message in this thread
 |
Date: July 1st, 2009 12:37 PM Author: Rusted bateful idea he suggested milk
given latham's behavior in the 90s and their behavior now, they've demonstrated that they'll fuck you over at the first sign of trouble. peer firms are biting the bullet instead of laying people off. so, do you want to be at a firm that fucks over first years at the first sign of trouble, or do you want a firm that's going to honor its commitment to you? NY cleared out 45% of associates accross all class levels. they by no means needed to do that to survive.
that said, if latham is all you can get, take it. but if you can go to gibson, or any good firm that doesn't screw over its associates, then do that.
and don't think you're safe just because they've cleaned house alread. this financial mess could take years to unwind and that could mean more layoffs down the line. just ask any junior associate at Latham NY or LA how safe they feel right now. that should answer your question.
hth.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1031289&forum_id=2#12132342) |
|
|