\
  The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
BackRefresh Options Favorite

FUCK CIV PRO RIGHT IN THE ASS!

Seriously, why is this on the bar. I hated this shit in LS....
Sooty 180 business firm
  07/02/09
sounds like you're pissed off enough at the material to have...
Pungent boistinker
  07/02/09
The lecture outlines from barbri are twice as long as the CM...
Sooty 180 business firm
  07/02/09


Poast new message in this thread



Reply Favorite

Date: July 2nd, 2009 6:10 PM
Author: Sooty 180 business firm

Seriously, why is this on the bar. I hated this shit in LS.

Are they really going to test us in essays on the interpleader versus impleader rules, and whether you have 20 or 30 days to file cross claims in Fed Court versus CA court?

If you want to ask about Personal Jurisdiction, SMJ, Eerie, or claim preclusion, thats fine - but dont ask me about a fucking extraordinary writ please.

Are other CA takers actually memorizing this shit?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1032414&forum_id=2#12143567)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 2nd, 2009 6:12 PM
Author: Pungent boistinker

sounds like you're pissed off enough at the material to have learned it.

i skipped the civpro lectures because it's fucking bullshit that he went through 70 pages of lecture outline in two days. gonna read straight from the CMR for that one.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1032414&forum_id=2#12143577)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 2nd, 2009 6:22 PM
Author: Sooty 180 business firm

The lecture outlines from barbri are twice as long as the CMR. CMR is just like plain text.

The barbri outlines basically have a CA and a fed component separately. Like 50 pages of shit.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1032414&forum_id=2#12143632)