Secondary journal EIC, worth it?
| claret pungent mother senate | 02/04/10 | | Cobalt brunch | 02/04/10 | | claret pungent mother senate | 02/04/10 | | Cobalt brunch | 02/04/10 | | claret pungent mother senate | 02/04/10 | | Cobalt brunch | 02/04/10 | | razzle gaping | 02/04/10 | | claret pungent mother senate | 02/04/10 | | razzle gaping | 02/04/10 | | claret pungent mother senate | 02/04/10 | | claret pungent mother senate | 02/04/10 | | abnormal theatre boistinker | 02/06/10 | | Aquamarine talented sex offender | 02/06/10 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: February 4th, 2010 9:22 AM Author: claret pungent mother senate Subject: tyia
I'm trying to decide if I want to serve as EIC of my secondary journal. The journal is relatively young and not particularly prestigious. Its topic is directly relevant to an area of the law I'd like to work in post-graduation.
There is a strong likelihood that if I apply for the EIC job, I'll get it.
Relevant information: At the moment I have no job prospects. I already served one year on the edit board in a bullshit position. Without staying on the journal, my 3L year would be easy as fuck.
So my question: Is all the time and energy that I'd have to put in to do it correctly worth the bump on my resume from edit board member to EIC?
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1212083&forum_id=2#14011232)
|
Date: February 4th, 2010 11:04 AM Author: razzle gaping
I did it...its a lot of bullshit as you get the stress of dealing with collegues who are unemployed as well and really dont give a crap about their journal or care too much where they are making your job 100 times harder. I still would have done it because some parts are rewarding and maybe 20 years down the road it might be a good line...
It does help the resume a little but me, the managing editor, and the articles editor still unemployed...basically Law Review nobody > EIC of secondary journal...
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1212083&forum_id=2#14011683) |
|
|