The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
|
 |
 
|
LOL the con law on the bar exam is easy as FUCK
Poast new message in this thread
Date: July 10th, 2012 5:21 PM Author: lascivious boistinker Haven't gotten below 90% on any set of questions. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1990636&forum_id=2#21055929) |
Date: July 10th, 2012 5:22 PM Author: transparent exhilarant dragon casino Agreed. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1990636&forum_id=2#21055932) |
 |
Date: July 10th, 2012 5:23 PM Author: lascivious boistinker I mean I'm doing pretty well on other MBE topics (aside from real property, LOL) but I just blast con law. And I was no con law master man in law school let me tell you. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1990636&forum_id=2#21055937) |
|
Date: July 10th, 2012 5:23 PM Author: glittery macaca it really is shockingly easy...averaging 84% over 150 qs or so (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1990636&forum_id=2#21055935) |
|
Date: July 10th, 2012 7:29 PM Author: Magical Lavender Indirect Expression dude I just got a hypo wrong where TTThemis claims it would be constitutional for congress to pass a law saying in substance "no one can discriminate against black people ever in any form in any business transaction."
They claim this would be upheld under the 13th Amendment. Yeah right. |
|
Date: July 10th, 2012 7:39 PM Author: Orange Hall i think this might be true, little breh (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1990636&forum_id=2#21056870) |
|
Date: July 10th, 2012 7:57 PM Author: Magical Lavender Indirect Expression it is 1965 (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1990636&forum_id=2#21057013) |
|
Date: July 10th, 2012 7:59 PM Author: saffron field It's correct. The Thirteenth Amendment enables Congress to pass laws applicable to anyone to end all “badges and incidents” of slavery, so basically they can do whatever they want about racial discrimination. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1990636&forum_id=2#21057033) |
|
Date: July 10th, 2012 8:03 PM Author: Magical Lavender Indirect Expression you are aware there were 4-5 votes to strike down Obamacare? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1990636&forum_id=2#21057063) |
|
Date: July 10th, 2012 8:00 PM Author: Citrine razzmatazz dilemma i thought the same thing while studying last year but iirc constitutional law ended up being surprisingly difficult on the actual MBE (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1990636&forum_id=2#21057042) |
|
Date: July 10th, 2012 8:02 PM Author: Slimy brilliant base scourge upon the earth YES THIS IS TRUE. THEY HAVE MADE IT MORE DIFFICULT--I KNOW THIS BECAUSE I TOOK THE MBE THIS FEB 2012 (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1990636&forum_id=2#21057056) |
|
Date: July 10th, 2012 8:08 PM Author: saffron field did they pwn you with article 3 original jurisdiction? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1990636&forum_id=2#21057099) |
|
Date: July 10th, 2012 8:03 PM Author: twinkling mewling doctorate wrinkle Lulling you into a false sense of security. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1990636&forum_id=2#21057061) |
|
Date: July 10th, 2012 10:14 PM Author: cracking coiffed heaven con law MBE is actually kinda hard on the real exam... or at least it was last yr. luckily, one of my state's essays had a con law component and i killed that shit; definitely was easier than MBE conlaw tho (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1990636&forum_id=2#21058290) |
|
Date: June 1st, 2013 7:05 PM Author: godawful menage toaster (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1990636&forum_id=2#23312574) |