\
  The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
BackRefresh Options Favorite

SMART REPUBLICANS: Do they exist?

How is it that roughly half the country subscribes to an eco...
marvelous gaping
  07/25/12
Tax breaks that aren't met with a corresponding spending dec...
Rose curious marketing idea feces
  07/25/12
not on XOXO that's for sure
aphrodisiac personal credit line
  07/25/12
yfwgi
Electric kitchen
  07/25/12
A cogent and thorough response, sir.
marvelous gaping
  07/25/12
ur post doesn't warrant a response "How is it that r...
Electric kitchen
  07/25/12
180
Mischievous Church Associate
  07/25/12
pwn pwn pwn
splenetic cuck
  07/25/12
You seriously think Vedder is a "respected" econom...
marvelous gaping
  07/25/12
To be fair, (Random dipshit on the internet, authoritativ...
deep institution goyim
  07/25/12
lol @ this clown college dropout getting destroyed.
cowardly irate roommate
  07/25/12
The vast majority of Republicans are Keynesian and/or neo-cl...
excitant high-end fat ankles
  07/25/12
You are retarded.
beady-eyed purple hell
  07/25/12
My response is both pertinent and factually correct. Republi...
excitant high-end fat ankles
  07/25/12
tcr
chest-beating floppy ratface
  07/25/12
"How is it that roughly half the country subscribes to ...
Mischievous Church Associate
  07/25/12
funny you recommend someone go post on a site that despises ...
Exhilarant azn
  07/25/12
Explain the 5 Nobel Laureates in economics who wrote in Geor...
Mischievous Church Associate
  07/25/12
Explain your being a pumo
marvelous gaping
  07/25/12
Explain Harvard's economics department.
Mischievous Church Associate
  07/25/12
Explain Stanford's economics department.
Mischievous Church Associate
  07/25/12
Explain Ben Bernanke.
Mischievous Church Associate
  07/25/12
Explain Ken Rogoff.
Mischievous Church Associate
  07/25/12
Explain To Be Fair.
Hyperactive Station
  07/25/12
...
arousing grizzly dingle berry hospital
  07/25/12
...
Mischievous Church Associate
  07/25/12
To be fair, Still waiting
deep institution goyim
  07/25/12
Explain one reputable economist who is on the side of Obama'...
Mischievous Church Associate
  07/25/12
...
Electric kitchen
  07/25/12
This. You will find almost no economists who think min wage,...
excitant high-end fat ankles
  07/25/12
TBF: comparative advantage etc etc etc. this isn't a bad poi...
marvelous gaping
  07/25/12
This has been quite the gaping
opaque spectacular keepsake machete
  07/25/12
...
splenetic cuck
  07/25/12
I wanted to slide my dick in but your hole is already so gap...
rusted 180 den psychic
  07/25/12
...
deep institution goyim
  07/25/12
negative
chest-beating floppy ratface
  07/25/12
lololololololololololol
Cream swashbuckling useless brakes stag film
  07/25/12
Explain Paul Krugman
Henna exciting gunner
  07/25/12
Link to Paul Krugman advocating one-time tax breaks as stimu...
marvelous gaping
  07/25/12
There's no such thing as a smart partisan. Both parties are ...
flirting stimulating stage
  07/25/12
Cr
Fragrant center antidepressant drug
  07/25/12
To be fair, Demonstrably false. There's no such thing ...
deep institution goyim
  07/25/12


Poast new message in this thread



Reply Favorite

Date: July 25th, 2012 1:26 AM
Author: marvelous gaping

How is it that roughly half the country subscribes to an economics model that ALL respected economists have rejected?

I have friends that are conservatives. I have friends that are extremely intelligent conservatives. But even conservative economics (e.g., Friedman's permanent income hypothesis) flatly contradict Republican ideas (e.g., that one-time tax breaks are stimulus).

When two decades of "trickle down" and flatter (and flatter still) tax curves have resulted in two recessions and a near-depression, how can anyone who believes in evidence-based decision-making support the Republican economic platform?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2004177&forum_id=2#21169656)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 25th, 2012 1:50 AM
Author: Rose curious marketing idea feces

Tax breaks that aren't met with a corresponding spending decrease would be considered a stimulus (in that Y goes up) by pretty much anyone

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2004177&forum_id=2#21169744)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 25th, 2012 2:26 AM
Author: aphrodisiac personal credit line

not on XOXO that's for sure

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2004177&forum_id=2#21169933)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 25th, 2012 1:27 AM
Author: Electric kitchen

yfwgi

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2004177&forum_id=2#21169665)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 25th, 2012 1:30 AM
Author: marvelous gaping

A cogent and thorough response, sir.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2004177&forum_id=2#21169670)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 25th, 2012 1:37 AM
Author: Electric kitchen

ur post doesn't warrant a response

"How is it that roughly half the country subscribes to an economics model that ALL respected economists have rejected?"

richard vedder, martin feldstein, greg mankiw, etc? lol at this question

"even conservative economics (e.g., Friedman's permanent income hypothesis) flatly contradict Republican ideas (e.g., that one-time tax breaks are stimulus)."

this is just wrong, plenty of con economists support one-time tax breaks. and one-time tax breaks are mostly political anyway -- reptiles would make them permanent if dems didnt obstruct

"When two decades of "trickle down" and flatter (and flatter still) tax curves have resulted in two recessions and a near-depression, how can anyone who believes in evidence-based decision-making support the Republican economic platform?"

if you think that bush lowering clinton's tax rates on the rich by 3% is the reason are economy sucks then ur just beyond help. lol@ this dailykos/huffpo line of reasoning

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2004177&forum_id=2#21169701)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 25th, 2012 1:39 AM
Author: Mischievous Church Associate

180

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2004177&forum_id=2#21169711)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 25th, 2012 1:57 AM
Author: splenetic cuck

pwn pwn pwn

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2004177&forum_id=2#21169765)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 25th, 2012 10:44 AM
Author: marvelous gaping

You seriously think Vedder is a "respected" economist? Please. He hasn't had a single original idea in his entire life.

Feldstein is indisputably "respected" - by those who can overlook the fact that he was on the board of AIG when it imploded and took half the world economy with it.

Mankiw is a Keynsian. I am skeptical that he supports the mainstream Republican economic impulse, despite his position on Romney's campaign.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2004177&forum_id=2#21170811)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 25th, 2012 12:48 PM
Author: deep institution goyim

To be fair,

(Random dipshit on the internet, authoritatively dismissing Vedder as a serious economist based on wishful thinking and vague but cherished memories from that 'Introduction to the Economic Perspective on Human Rights' class he took freshman year at Vassar)

*Waits on the edge of my seat for you to reveal that--just like an XO pumo--"ACTUALLY" you have "an advanced degree in economics...!"*

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2004177&forum_id=2#21171706)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 25th, 2012 2:19 AM
Author: cowardly irate roommate

lol @ this clown college dropout getting destroyed.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2004177&forum_id=2#21169884)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 25th, 2012 1:30 AM
Author: excitant high-end fat ankles

The vast majority of Republicans are Keynesian and/or neo-classicals, there is minimal difference between Republican and Democrat principles when it comes to economic constructs. Moreover, the whole "trickle-down" schtick was an elaborate false labeling campaign by Dems in the 80s and onward.

No offense, but your knowledge in this area seems to be limited to what you watch on MSNBC.

Edit: Maybe I am a bit harsh on you re: "trickle-down" google that + "Sowell". He makes and then defends the fact that no actually economists made the claims that people associate with the "trickle-down" ideology.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2004177&forum_id=2#21169672)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 25th, 2012 1:33 AM
Author: beady-eyed purple hell

You are retarded.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2004177&forum_id=2#21169679)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 25th, 2012 1:40 AM
Author: excitant high-end fat ankles

My response is both pertinent and factually correct. Republican economic policy has the same underlying principles as mainstream neo-classical economics. Moreover, the notion of their being an identifiable advocating of "trickle-down theory" among any political party is totally false (see Sowell).

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2004177&forum_id=2#21169713)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 25th, 2012 2:26 AM
Author: chest-beating floppy ratface

tcr

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2004177&forum_id=2#21169926)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 25th, 2012 1:32 AM
Author: Mischievous Church Associate

"How is it that roughly half the country subscribes to an economics model that ALL respected economists have rejected?"

Are you insane? Post your garbage on econjobrumors.com, and watch the lulz.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2004177&forum_id=2#21169676)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 25th, 2012 9:24 AM
Author: Exhilarant azn

funny you recommend someone go post on a site that despises you

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2004177&forum_id=2#21170460)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 25th, 2012 1:34 AM
Author: Mischievous Church Associate

Explain the 5 Nobel Laureates in economics who wrote in George W. Bush's latest book.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2004177&forum_id=2#21169682)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 25th, 2012 10:33 AM
Author: marvelous gaping

Explain your being a pumo

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2004177&forum_id=2#21170728)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 25th, 2012 1:35 AM
Author: Mischievous Church Associate

Explain Harvard's economics department.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2004177&forum_id=2#21169687)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 25th, 2012 1:35 AM
Author: Mischievous Church Associate

Explain Stanford's economics department.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2004177&forum_id=2#21169689)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 25th, 2012 1:35 AM
Author: Mischievous Church Associate

Explain Ben Bernanke.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2004177&forum_id=2#21169691)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 25th, 2012 1:36 AM
Author: Mischievous Church Associate

Explain Ken Rogoff.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2004177&forum_id=2#21169697)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 25th, 2012 1:38 AM
Author: Hyperactive Station

Explain To Be Fair.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2004177&forum_id=2#21169703)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 25th, 2012 1:38 AM
Author: arousing grizzly dingle berry hospital



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2004177&forum_id=2#21169704)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 25th, 2012 1:39 AM
Author: Mischievous Church Associate



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2004177&forum_id=2#21169708)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 25th, 2012 12:48 PM
Author: deep institution goyim

To be fair,

Still waiting

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2004177&forum_id=2#21171713)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 25th, 2012 1:39 AM
Author: Mischievous Church Associate

Explain one reputable economist who is on the side of Obama's anti-outsourcing stance.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2004177&forum_id=2#21169706)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 25th, 2012 1:39 AM
Author: Electric kitchen



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2004177&forum_id=2#21169709)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 25th, 2012 1:41 AM
Author: excitant high-end fat ankles

This. You will find almost no economists who think min wage, protectionist policies, etc, are actually anything but harmful.

Not to say Repubs don't share similarly retarded stances.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2004177&forum_id=2#21169722)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 25th, 2012 10:32 AM
Author: marvelous gaping

TBF: comparative advantage etc etc etc. this isn't a bad point. that said, Obama is concerned about the American economy, not the global one. and min wage etc. are IMO more social policy issues than economics issues.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2004177&forum_id=2#21170714)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 25th, 2012 1:47 AM
Author: opaque spectacular keepsake machete

This has been quite the gaping

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2004177&forum_id=2#21169736)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 25th, 2012 1:58 AM
Author: splenetic cuck



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2004177&forum_id=2#21169768)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 25th, 2012 2:24 AM
Author: rusted 180 den psychic

I wanted to slide my dick in but your hole is already so gaped I wouldn't feel anything, so I'm masturbating instead.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2004177&forum_id=2#21169918)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 25th, 2012 12:49 PM
Author: deep institution goyim



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2004177&forum_id=2#21171717)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 25th, 2012 2:25 AM
Author: chest-beating floppy ratface

negative

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2004177&forum_id=2#21169925)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 25th, 2012 9:22 AM
Author: Cream swashbuckling useless brakes stag film

lololololololololololol

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2004177&forum_id=2#21170451)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 25th, 2012 9:29 AM
Author: Henna exciting gunner

Explain Paul Krugman

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2004177&forum_id=2#21170482)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 25th, 2012 10:33 AM
Author: marvelous gaping

Link to Paul Krugman advocating one-time tax breaks as stimulus and a less-progressive tax system?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2004177&forum_id=2#21170724)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 25th, 2012 9:41 AM
Author: flirting stimulating stage

There's no such thing as a smart partisan. Both parties are utter shit.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2004177&forum_id=2#21170521)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 25th, 2012 10:38 AM
Author: Fragrant center antidepressant drug

Cr

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2004177&forum_id=2#21170767)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 25th, 2012 12:49 PM
Author: deep institution goyim

To be fair,

Demonstrably false.

There's no such thing as a wise partisan, however.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2004177&forum_id=2#21171719)