is CADWALADER NY really that bad?
| fuchsia partner property | 01/01/13 | | big location friendly grandma | 01/01/13 | | demanding tripping hissy fit laser beams | 01/01/13 | | Apoplectic Theater Stage Pozpig | 01/01/13 | | know-it-all thriller hospital quadroon | 01/01/13 | | Azure Cruise Ship | 01/01/13 | | Olive fiercely-loyal kitty cat | 04/19/17 | | Azure Cruise Ship | 01/01/13 | | narrow-minded bat shit crazy hunting ground trust fund | 01/01/13 | | 180 onyx stag film | 04/19/17 | | embarrassed to the bone dilemma boiling water | 07/09/17 | | turquoise range | 10/31/13 | | 180 onyx stag film | 04/19/17 | | Crystalline set sound barrier | 04/19/17 | | concupiscible blue stage preventive strike | 07/09/17 | | Crystalline set sound barrier | 04/19/17 | | embarrassed to the bone dilemma boiling water | 04/19/17 | | concupiscible blue stage preventive strike | 07/09/17 | | exciting state | 07/09/17 | | Crystalline set sound barrier | 11/29/17 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: January 1st, 2013 4:51 PM Author: know-it-all thriller hospital quadroon
I had a callback there - one of my interviewers literally kept working while I answered questions - like he had a sheet of rote questions he'd ask and then go back to work until he heard silence then he'd ask another question and go back to work, etc.
I left midway through the callback without telling anyone.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2150062&forum_id=2#22348164) |
|
Date: April 19th, 2017 8:26 AM Author: 180 onyx stag film
Seems harsh. Who can follow thwt mambo jumbo preceding the censure?
Remarkably, in its opening brief on behalf of its client Mead Johnson, the well‐known law firm of Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft argued that the amendment does apply to claims and suits as well as to occurrences, because the caption of the amendment is “Duties in the Event of Occur‐ rence, Offense, Claim or Suit.” That is a misrepresentation. The caption is “Duties in the Event of Occurrence, Offense, Claim or Suit, a. is hereby deleted and replaced with the fol‐ lowing,” the “following” being the passage relating to notice to the risk manager of occurrences, not claims. The new pro‐ vision “a,” like the old one that it replaced, begins: “You must see to it that we are notified as soon as practicable on [sic] any ‘occurrence’ or an offense which may result in a claim.” (“Offense” is not defined, but the policy contains a list of covered “offenses,” such as copyright infringement— and, as we’ll see when we come to the second suit by Mead Johnson, product disparagement.) Claim and suit are men‐ tioned not in provision “a” but in provision “b,” which con‐ tains no reference to the Director of Risk Management. The amendment changed only “a,” which pertains only to occur‐ rences.
Cadwalader’s frivolous interpretation, though exposed in the insurance companies’ brief, is repeated in Mead John‐ son’s reply brief and was defended by Cadwalader’s lawyer for Mead at the oral argument. That a major law firm would engage in such shenanigans distresses us. The firm’s argu‐ ment regarding the amendment to the National Union in‐ surance policy is censurable, and we hereby censure it.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2150062&forum_id=2#33108687) |
Date: April 19th, 2017 1:33 PM Author: embarrassed to the bone dilemma boiling water
Cadwalader
NY
----
Total(20)
----
Brooklyn(4)
Columbia(3)
Penn(3)
Fordham(3)
NYU(2)
Harvard(1)
Cornell(1)
Duke(1)
Michigan(1)
Cardozo(1)
____
Charlotte
----
Total(3)
----
WUSTL(2)
Vanderbilt(1)
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2150062&forum_id=2#33110767) |
Date: July 9th, 2017 3:06 PM Author: exciting state
LJL
Cadwalader isn't even a firm anymore
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2150062&forum_id=2#33735623) |
|
|