\
  The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
BackRefresh Options Favorite

RATE this DLA piper lawyer's suit

http://dealbook.nytimes.com/2013/03/25/suit-offers-a-peek-at...
stimulating sapphire ladyboy trust fund
  03/26/13
That's the business owner that's suing them.
razzle-dazzle stead private investor
  03/26/13
And his suit is hideous.
Vivacious ticket booth
  06/02/14
i realize this but i wanted people to click on this thread
stimulating sapphire ladyboy trust fund
  03/26/13
Hey man that's not the lawyer its the business owner who's s...
Swashbuckling Translucent Business Firm
  03/26/13
It says more about your desperate trolling attempts than it ...
Embarrassed to the bone volcanic crater pervert
  05/23/13
Almost as bad as his comb-over
electric infuriating step-uncle's house
  05/23/13
dla piper is one the worst firms to do discovery shit with, ...
Dark Newt
  05/23/13
The matter was being handled by a seventh year associate who...
blue sex offender useless brakes
  05/23/13
bro seriously. was there discovery shit in front of the magi...
Dark Newt
  05/23/13
What's the alternative, that one of the recipients of the sm...
blue sex offender useless brakes
  05/23/13
let's say you're an associate sending them email. the receiv...
Dark Newt
  05/23/13
Bro I really have no idea what you're talking about here but...
blue sex offender useless brakes
  05/23/13
you seriously think they would admit to the email's existenc...
Dark Newt
  05/23/13
Dude, again, I'm not a lit masterman, but the fucking articl...
blue sex offender useless brakes
  05/23/13
...
Dark Newt
  05/23/13
how come one of the stripes just disappears?!?
Arousing Point
  05/23/13
on their logo?
Dark Newt
  05/23/13
oh, i guess that's where 2 pieces were joined. looks weird a...
Arousing Point
  05/23/13
want to venture a guess at my question above?
Dark Newt
  05/23/13
sorry bro, i don't see what you're talking about
Arousing Point
  05/23/13
in the article the quotes from assocs about churning hours t...
Dark Newt
  05/23/13
bro i thought we were talking about suits. i don't work i...
Arousing Point
  05/23/13
...
outnumbered base
  06/02/14


Poast new message in this thread



Reply Favorite

Date: March 26th, 2013 9:34 PM
Author: stimulating sapphire ladyboy trust fund

http://dealbook.nytimes.com/2013/03/25/suit-offers-a-peek-at-the-practice-of-padding-a-legal-bill/?hp

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2214652&forum_id=2#22886198)



Reply Favorite

Date: March 26th, 2013 9:34 PM
Author: razzle-dazzle stead private investor

That's the business owner that's suing them.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2214652&forum_id=2#22886208)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 2nd, 2014 7:36 PM
Author: Vivacious ticket booth

And his suit is hideous.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2214652&forum_id=2#25675233)



Reply Favorite

Date: March 26th, 2013 9:36 PM
Author: stimulating sapphire ladyboy trust fund

i realize this but i wanted people to click on this thread

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2214652&forum_id=2#22886217)



Reply Favorite

Date: March 26th, 2013 9:37 PM
Author: Swashbuckling Translucent Business Firm

Hey man that's not the lawyer its the business owner who's suing DLA.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2214652&forum_id=2#22886230)



Reply Favorite

Date: May 23rd, 2013 4:09 PM
Author: Embarrassed to the bone volcanic crater pervert

It says more about your desperate trolling attempts than it ever could about the wearer.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2214652&forum_id=2#23256254)



Reply Favorite

Date: May 23rd, 2013 4:13 PM
Author: electric infuriating step-uncle's house

Almost as bad as his comb-over

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2214652&forum_id=2#23256273)



Reply Favorite

Date: May 23rd, 2013 4:21 PM
Author: Dark Newt

dla piper is one the worst firms to do discovery shit with, epsecially e-discovery. these emails must've been turned over by earl or another disgruntled former assoc right? no fucking way did dla piper turn these over in some rfp "all emails relating to billing plaintiff."

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2214652&forum_id=2#23256324)



Reply Favorite

Date: May 23rd, 2013 4:33 PM
Author: blue sex offender useless brakes

The matter was being handled by a seventh year associate who probably had a bunch of ther shit going on and decided to mail it in on this matter because it wasn't billable. Whoops.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2214652&forum_id=2#23256414)



Reply Favorite

Date: May 23rd, 2013 4:35 PM
Author: Dark Newt

bro seriously. was there discovery shit in front of the magistrate? i can't imagine they held onto this on their server. you think the other side won a motion to get a forensic comp sci dork in their building to look for emails with certain search terms?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2214652&forum_id=2#23256430)



Reply Favorite

Date: May 23rd, 2013 4:52 PM
Author: blue sex offender useless brakes

What's the alternative, that one of the recipients of the smoking gun emails emailed them in to the plaintiff? They're all lawyers and they could all seriously fuck themselves for having done so.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2214652&forum_id=2#23256548)



Reply Favorite

Date: May 23rd, 2013 4:53 PM
Author: Dark Newt

let's say you're an associate sending them email. the receiver finds you after the suit is filed and says "bro, i deleted my email, you took it out of your sent file, right?"

what happens?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2214652&forum_id=2#23256558)



Reply Favorite

Date: May 23rd, 2013 5:00 PM
Author: blue sex offender useless brakes

Bro I really have no idea what you're talking about here but maybe that's because I'm not a litigation masterman. Given the stuff i've read, the most likely explanation to me was that DLA tossed this at an associate on partner track, he mailed it in and decided to do a document dump that ended up fucking him in the ass. And yes, I do think DLA would have had these emails on their server. I know my firm would have. So all it would have taken was a doc request with the relevant attorneys' names and dates. I think that's more plausible than one of the recipients, who presumably no longer works there, knowing about the suit and sending these incriminating emails to the plaintiff.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2214652&forum_id=2#23256622)



Reply Favorite

Date: May 23rd, 2013 5:02 PM
Author: Dark Newt

you seriously think they would admit to the email's existence and not say "RFP 12) attached find 4,651 emails to and from john smith containing the term "widgets 123?"

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2214652&forum_id=2#23256636)



Reply Favorite

Date: May 23rd, 2013 5:05 PM
Author: blue sex offender useless brakes

Dude, again, I'm not a lit masterman, but the fucking article itself says the emails were included in 250,000 pages of docs turned over by DLA.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2214652&forum_id=2#23256663)



Reply Favorite

Date: May 23rd, 2013 4:26 PM
Author: Dark Newt



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2214652&forum_id=2#23256351)



Reply Favorite

Date: May 23rd, 2013 4:38 PM
Author: Arousing Point

how come one of the stripes just disappears?!?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2214652&forum_id=2#23256457)



Reply Favorite

Date: May 23rd, 2013 4:41 PM
Author: Dark Newt

on their logo?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2214652&forum_id=2#23256472)



Reply Favorite

Date: May 23rd, 2013 4:44 PM
Author: Arousing Point

oh, i guess that's where 2 pieces were joined. looks weird as fuck with the wide guido stripes.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2214652&forum_id=2#23256486)



Reply Favorite

Date: May 23rd, 2013 4:45 PM
Author: Dark Newt

want to venture a guess at my question above?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2214652&forum_id=2#23256492)



Reply Favorite

Date: May 23rd, 2013 4:48 PM
Author: Arousing Point

sorry bro, i don't see what you're talking about

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2214652&forum_id=2#23256515)



Reply Favorite

Date: May 23rd, 2013 4:50 PM
Author: Dark Newt

in the article the quotes from assocs about churning hours the plaintiff is using as evidence.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2214652&forum_id=2#23256528)



Reply Favorite

Date: May 23rd, 2013 4:56 PM
Author: Arousing Point

bro i thought we were talking about suits.

i don't work in lit so i'm not sure how jewy dla is w/ discovery.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2214652&forum_id=2#23256583)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 2nd, 2014 7:34 PM
Author: outnumbered base



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2214652&forum_id=2#25675228)