The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
|
 |
 
|
SCOTUS unnecessarily taking wacky cases
| turquoise clown | 05/23/13 |
| Wonderful Anal People Who Are Hurt | 05/23/13 |
| lime histrionic lay marketing idea | 05/23/13 |
| turquoise clown | 05/23/13 |
| lime histrionic lay marketing idea | 05/24/13 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: May 23rd, 2013 11:07 PM Author: turquoise clown Did you ever think you'd need SCOTUS to write this paragraph?
"
We hold, in accord with the New Hampshire Supreme Court, that state-law claims stemming from the storage and disposal of a car, once towing has ended, are not sufficiently connected to a motor carrier’s service with respect to the transportation of property to warrant pre- emption under §14501(c)(1). The New Hampshire law in point regulates no towing services, no carriage of prop- erty. Instead, it trains on custodians of stored vehicles seeking to sell them. Congress did not displace the State’s regulation of that activity by any federal prescription."
THANK GOD THEY CLEARED THAT UP. |
 |
Date: May 23rd, 2013 11:15 PM Author: Wonderful Anal People Who Are Hurt ljl the law is sps (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2264317&forum_id=2#23258689) |
Date: May 23rd, 2013 11:22 PM Author: lime histrionic lay marketing idea who the fuck wrote that? Get some Elements of Style on this bitch. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2264317&forum_id=2#23258735) |
|
Date: May 23rd, 2013 11:50 PM Author: turquoise clown Ginsburg, earlier this month. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2264317&forum_id=2#23258945) |
|
Date: May 24th, 2013 12:05 AM Author: lime histrionic lay marketing idea (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2264317&forum_id=2#23259045) |