The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
|
 |
 
|
on average, men have more sex partners than women (Julia)
Poast new message in this thread
Date: February 4th, 2014 4:30 PM Author: Cobalt Community Account (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2486444&forum_id=2#24956387) |
 |
Date: March 2nd, 2014 4:39 PM Author: laughsome misunderstood puppy telephone To be fair,
The crazy thing about this thread is that Julia is actually right because I have had sex with a lot of men for money. |
Date: February 4th, 2014 4:41 PM Author: cerise violent marketing idea stag film (it is 1957) (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2486444&forum_id=2#24956442) |
|
Date: February 4th, 2014 4:47 PM Author: silver ceo indirect expression Men still have nearly twice as many partners, according to the NIH. Sorry you're only dating OKC sluts and assuming they're representative of the entire sex.
http://www.nbcnews.com/id/37853719/ns/health-sexual_health/t/surprising-sex-statistics/#.UvFf0k4o7VI |
|
Date: February 4th, 2014 4:49 PM Author: racy violet plaza (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2486444&forum_id=2#24956476) |
|
Date: February 4th, 2014 4:52 PM Author: Transparent spectacular rehab coffee pot those statistics are skewed because for most men it's a number to be proud of and for most women it's still a number to be ashamed of. also of course the mean for men is gonna be higher because at the upper end there are some men who have just a mind blowing amount of sex, like thousands of partners. but the median woman definitely has more sex than the median man, IMO (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2486444&forum_id=2#24956490) |
|
Date: February 4th, 2014 4:53 PM Author: silver ceo indirect expression Uh-huh. We'll just assume the NIH is wrong, but your anecdotal experience with OKC slores is an accurate representation. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2486444&forum_id=2#24956495) |
|
Date: February 4th, 2014 4:53 PM Author: Transparent spectacular rehab coffee pot just do use logic to interpret statistics (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2486444&forum_id=2#24956504) |
|
Date: February 4th, 2014 4:54 PM Author: silver ceo indirect expression Tell me more about this. Should I create a site called "unskewedsexstatistics.com" and attempt to unskew the anti-man bias in sex statistics, genius? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2486444&forum_id=2#24956513) |
|
Date: February 4th, 2014 4:56 PM Author: racy violet plaza please tell us more about the mean number of sexual partners for an equal population of straight men and women. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2486444&forum_id=2#24956522) |
|
Date: February 4th, 2014 6:27 PM Author: sadistic mediation shrine fuck, lol (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2486444&forum_id=2#24957103) |
|
Date: September 30th, 2014 1:08 PM Author: irate chad gotta be flame (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2486444&forum_id=2#26428072) |
|
Date: February 4th, 2014 4:55 PM Author: cerise violent marketing idea stag film IIRC it is actually mathematically impossible for men and women to have a different average # of partners
Supposedly the main reason for the divergence is that prostitutes are underrepresented in the surveys |
|
Date: February 4th, 2014 5:05 PM Author: pearl violent associate can you do the proof for this? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2486444&forum_id=2#24956577) |
|
Date: February 4th, 2014 5:07 PM Author: drunken kitty old irish cottage basic logic pro, men and women both have exactly 50% partners for sex. because you either have sex or you dont. half and half. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2486444&forum_id=2#24956586) |
|
Date: February 4th, 2014 5:08 PM Author: Adventurous coldplay fan hissy fit assuming population is of men and women are equal. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2486444&forum_id=2#24956589) |
|
Date: February 4th, 2014 6:27 PM Author: sadistic mediation shrine ty (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2486444&forum_id=2#24957108) |
|
Date: February 4th, 2014 10:21 PM Author: sadistic mediation shrine (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2486444&forum_id=2#24958498) |
|
Date: February 4th, 2014 10:31 PM Author: twinkling self-centered hominid striped hyena (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2486444&forum_id=2#24958573) |
|
Date: February 5th, 2014 9:34 AM Author: multi-colored selfie (cisbigot) (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2486444&forum_id=2#24960423) |
|
Date: March 2nd, 2014 5:48 PM Author: Startled nudist mood jewess (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2486444&forum_id=2#25116094) |
|
Date: February 5th, 2014 6:19 AM Author: bipolar up-to-no-good locale You forgot about the tranny epidemic. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2486444&forum_id=2#24960149) |
|
Date: February 4th, 2014 5:59 PM Author: Fragrant confused point It's a self-reported survey, dipshit. Women underreport because they don't want to seem like sluts. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2486444&forum_id=2#24956937) |
|
Date: February 4th, 2014 7:47 PM Author: multi-colored selfie Not slutty ones, it's their body their choice and nothing to be ashamed of. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2486444&forum_id=2#24957585) |
|
Date: February 4th, 2014 7:47 PM Author: multi-colored selfie THATS A BURN (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2486444&forum_id=2#24957580) |
|
Date: February 4th, 2014 4:48 PM Author: pearl violent associate julia is also a retard so why would you take anything she says seriously? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2486444&forum_id=2#24956472) |
|
Date: February 4th, 2014 4:51 PM Author: silver ceo indirect expression (high IQ guy not taking the NIH seriously) (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2486444&forum_id=2#24956485) |
|
Date: February 4th, 2014 4:53 PM Author: racy violet plaza I think you are missing the point of the OP. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2486444&forum_id=2#24956502) |
|
Date: February 4th, 2014 4:55 PM Author: silver ceo indirect expression Explain. I am aspie, so this is quite possible. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2486444&forum_id=2#24956518) |
|
Date: February 4th, 2014 4:57 PM Author: racy violet plaza see above. average = mean. the point of this thread was to bash you for not understanding statistics, even if it's a little pedantic. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2486444&forum_id=2#24956531) |
|
Date: February 4th, 2014 4:58 PM Author: gay bearded hunting ground So OP is mocking Julia for making obvious statements? I guess that's possible but some of the responses in this thread show that xo posters have some dumb biases against women. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2486444&forum_id=2#24956536) |
|
Date: February 4th, 2014 5:00 PM Author: racy violet plaza no its bashing her for not seeing a statistical tautology (i think tautology works here) (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2486444&forum_id=2#24956553) |
|
Date: February 4th, 2014 5:04 PM Author: silver ceo indirect expression Yes, average= mean. Where did I say anything that contradicts this? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2486444&forum_id=2#24956570) |
|
Date: February 4th, 2014 5:08 PM Author: racy violet plaza if you have 100 women and 100 men in the world, and there are no gays, the two groups will have the same mean number of sex partners no matter what.
Sadly your last statement just dug your hole further. I was hoping you just meant average = median. |
|
Date: February 4th, 2014 5:12 PM Author: silver ceo indirect expression Not at all. There is also a disparity in the percentage of men vs women who never marry. According to the theory you're espousing, this can't be correct, either --except that we have documented proof of marriage.
But there are a couple of easy explanations for this:
1) Sex and marriage pools are not a perfect 1:1 ratio, because men generally marry women younger or the same age, therefore they have a larger pool from which to draw than women.
2)They may, in fact, be conflating means across an entire sex with means across reported samples. |
|
Date: February 4th, 2014 5:14 PM Author: pearl violent associate lol, you're done here (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2486444&forum_id=2#24956623) |
|
Date: February 4th, 2014 5:14 PM Author: irate chad gotta be flame (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2486444&forum_id=2#24956631) |
|
Date: February 4th, 2014 5:16 PM Author: racy violet plaza she will claim flame after she figures it out in about 15 minutes. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2486444&forum_id=2#24956645) |
|
Date: February 4th, 2014 5:22 PM Author: Adventurous coldplay fan hissy fit (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2486444&forum_id=2#24956682) |
|
Date: March 28th, 2014 11:31 AM Author: Anal iridescent locus sound barrier (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2486444&forum_id=2#25277646) |
|
Date: March 2nd, 2014 5:50 PM Author: Startled nudist mood jewess she has like a 160 iq bro. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2486444&forum_id=2#25116100) |
|
Date: February 4th, 2014 5:15 PM Author: Dull razzle-dazzle regret go on... (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2486444&forum_id=2#24956635) |
|
Date: February 4th, 2014 5:16 PM Author: Charcoal travel guidebook field as usual, you can't admit that you don't understand something. rather than slow down and try to figure it out, you'll just keep frantically digging and XO will laugh as you flail around. this is why nobody here thinks that you're as intelligent as you obsessively claim. you show no signs of it.
|
|
Date: February 4th, 2014 5:21 PM Author: silver ceo indirect expression No, I see the argument for why the ratio must be 1:1 clearly. It's intuitive and simple to understand.
The typical argument for why sex numbers are skewed, however, is that men are exaggerating numbers or women underreporting theirs. Yet, the evidence from marriage statistics points to the same sort of skew. A smaller percentage of men never marry than women (that is, men more readily have partners).
This is because the pool of available partners isn't, in fact, 1:1. Men have access to more younger partners, thereby artificially expanding their pool. While women can date older, consider that a higher mortality rate among men/older people decreases that pool. Therefore, there isn't a 1:1 ratio at all. |
|
Date: February 4th, 2014 5:23 PM Author: Dull razzle-dazzle regret please elaborate (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2486444&forum_id=2#24956690) |
|
Date: February 4th, 2014 5:24 PM Author: Khaki ticket booth I was going to throw you a life preserver, but this is just unreal. Carry on. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2486444&forum_id=2#24956696) |
|
Date: February 4th, 2014 5:25 PM Author: racy violet plaza Holy shit julia, it doesnt matter if lots of women never marry. If there are an equal number of men and women in the world and we ignore gays, the mean number of sex partners is the same.
If there are more men having sex with various partners, there are be defnition a smaller number of sluts with lots of partners.
EDIT:
The point of the thread was to bash you either for not getting the statistics - and you decide to go all in and stubbornly let the assburgers take control and apply unrelated data to a simple tautology.
|
|
Date: February 4th, 2014 5:26 PM Author: Adventurous coldplay fan hissy fit wish i could be there when the light bulb switches on. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2486444&forum_id=2#24956708) |
|
Date: February 4th, 2014 5:30 PM Author: Frum Cerebral Chapel Bbw Whenever she is finally able to unravel a simple concept that pretty much anyone with a passing familiarity with econ should already understand, a giant Thunderbrid spreads its wings, shrieks, and descends into the gaping maw of the sky. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2486444&forum_id=2#24956729) |
|
Date: February 4th, 2014 5:33 PM Author: silver ceo indirect expression Are you suggesting that I don't understand the argument about the 1:1 ratio? I already acknowledged how simple and intuitive this is. It's also wrong, because sex/dating pools are not closed systems. This is why the statistics demonstrate more sex partners and marriages for men. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2486444&forum_id=2#24956756) |
|
Date: February 4th, 2014 5:37 PM Author: Frum Cerebral Chapel Bbw Please never change. The part where you get aggro and condescending when XO won't indulge your fanciful reasoning is always a run read. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2486444&forum_id=2#24956803) |
|
Date: February 4th, 2014 5:40 PM Author: silver ceo indirect expression No, XO's condescension toward me is the funny part, assuming I don't understand the very simple 1:1 sex partnering concept. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2486444&forum_id=2#24956822) |
|
Date: February 4th, 2014 5:45 PM Author: startling hall sandwich any normal person who reads this thread would assume that. they would also assume you post facto started making up arguments about the 'relative dating pool size' when you realized you pwned yourself initially, which is why you edited it into your post. you invite condescension with your antics.
the fact that you will spin out of control ITT trying to back up your moronic assertions, as you always do when you get caught like this, just means that condescension is even more valid since you apparently learn nothing from subsequent freakouts. |
|
Date: February 4th, 2014 6:00 PM Author: silver ceo indirect expression My first assertion ITT was that men have more sex partners than women, on average. All (or most) statistics support this over time. The burden of evidence, thus, was not on me at the beginning, it was on the posters who tried to refute all the extant evidence with arguments about aggregate mating pools and 1:1 ratios. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2486444&forum_id=2#24956940) |
|
Date: February 4th, 2014 6:05 PM Author: racy violet plaza when you say on average, you understand that you mean "mean"
you also understand that there are the same number of men and women in the world.
if you were to say, the average (meaning random) man has had more sex partners than the average woman (meaning random), that might be the case because the pool of sexually active people is not equal.
But for the love of god, if you include people who were born and die, whether sexually active or virgins, or whatever, the average number of sexual partners that the worlds population of men have = the average number of partners that the worlds population of women have. |
|
Date: March 2nd, 2014 5:53 PM Author: Startled nudist mood jewess pretty good for a poli sci shithead. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2486444&forum_id=2#25116132) |
|
Date: February 4th, 2014 6:09 PM Author: Fragrant confused point You are a fucking MORON. I explained CLEARLY in the other thread why you're wrong. This is Harrison btw. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2486444&forum_id=2#24956991) |
|
Date: February 4th, 2014 6:10 PM Author: Exhilarant orchid really tough guy electric furnace That assertion is probably true, but the arguments you've offered to support it show a gaping lack of understanding. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2486444&forum_id=2#24956993) |
|
Date: February 4th, 2014 10:17 PM Author: twinkling self-centered hominid striped hyena Every male that has sex with a new female results in 1 additional partner for the male, and 1 additional partner for a female (a 1:1 ratio). Think about this for a second. Mean here requires that you add all of the sex partners up and divide by the number of people, which are equal. What is your confusion? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2486444&forum_id=2#24958463) |
|
Date: February 4th, 2014 5:31 PM Author: silver ceo indirect expression Earl, re-read what I said. The point about there being more women who never marry is to demonstrate another instance of women partnering less than men -- even in a world with an equal number of men/women.
My point, by extension of this, is that the underlying reason why the sex statistics are more accurate than you'd like to believe is because it isn't a 1:1 scenario.
Men, on average date/marry women of equal age or younger. This represents a larger pool of available mates for sex and/or marriage (as per the second example). Women have a smaller pool, because as they date similar age or older, the number of available men decreases due to death/age-related infirmity. They thus have a pool that is smaller than 1:1, in real terms.
|
|
Date: February 4th, 2014 5:33 PM Author: Chest-beating mildly autistic depressive yeah earl why cant you recognize these things god (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2486444&forum_id=2#24956755) |
|
Date: February 4th, 2014 5:34 PM Author: silver ceo indirect expression respond substantively/ (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2486444&forum_id=2#24956760) |
|
Date: February 4th, 2014 5:35 PM Author: Chest-beating mildly autistic depressive for every man that has sex (again, assuming no gays), there needs to be a woman he has sex with
can you figure it out from there |
|
Date: February 4th, 2014 5:39 PM Author: silver ceo indirect expression Yes, but what you're not figuring out is that it's not a closed system.
As an example:
John's available sex partners ( in real behavioral terms) are anyone his age (let's say 30) or younger, within reason (again, let's say 10 years' difference). So, John can date women aged 20-30.
For Ann (also 30), her available sex partners are anyone her age or up to 10 years older. That means men aged 30-40.
Unfortunately for Ann, there are fewer men aged 30-40 than women aged 20-30. So John has both the absolute numerical and probabilistic advantage. Additionally, more men aged 30-40 die off every day, so Ann is at an increasing disadvantage year after year, while John continues to benefit from improving statistics/female ratio & availability with every passing year. |
|
Date: February 4th, 2014 5:39 PM Author: Dull razzle-dazzle regret you go girl (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2486444&forum_id=2#24956816) |
|
Date: February 4th, 2014 5:44 PM Author: Chest-beating mildly autistic depressive so, who is John having sex with now that Ann is an unsexable shrew?
you can do this. |
|
Date: February 4th, 2014 5:53 PM Author: silver ceo indirect expression The younger woman, which is precisely my point. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2486444&forum_id=2#24956905) |
|
Date: February 4th, 2014 5:54 PM Author: Chest-beating mildly autistic depressive so, how many sexual partners does the younger woman have now (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2486444&forum_id=2#24956908) |
|
Date: February 4th, 2014 5:58 PM Author: silver ceo indirect expression Are you really dumb or just high? You're trying to "entrap" me in a specious/logically unsound argument you're trying to create. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2486444&forum_id=2#24956934) |
|
Date: February 4th, 2014 6:02 PM Author: Chest-beating mildly autistic depressive let's rephrase the question. in your example, how much has the total number of sexual partners increased for both the male and female population (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2486444&forum_id=2#24956952) |
|
Date: February 4th, 2014 10:19 PM Author: twinkling self-centered hominid striped hyena He is right. Follow his bread crumb trail and you'll arrive at the answer. The male has 1 new sex partner. So does the female. How do we calculate mean for both males and females? How does 1 new partner in each category affect the mean for males and females? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2486444&forum_id=2#24958482) |
|
Date: February 4th, 2014 5:54 PM Author: Adventurous coldplay fan hissy fit (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2486444&forum_id=2#24956909) |
|
Date: February 4th, 2014 6:00 PM Author: swashbuckling fanboi if john is 1 of 3 boys and ann is one of 3 girls, the fact that john slept with all 3 girls and all 3 girls only slept with john means that the average (mean) number of sexual partners is still 1 for each sex. if more of the boys bang more of the girls, the mean number of sexual partners for each group will bump up appropriately as well.
you are not going to win this battle if you continue to discuss mean. |
|
Date: February 4th, 2014 10:19 PM Author: twinkling self-centered hominid striped hyena tcr. Use small numbers like Nutella is doing to figure out why you're wrong here.
Incidentally, your error is not a philosophical one but a purely mathematical mistake. |
|
Date: February 4th, 2014 5:36 PM Author: Honey-headed set wait can i completely making up concepts about the relative sizes of the 'dating pool' for each sex too, and then set it out to support an assumed position? this sounds like fun.
|
|
Date: February 4th, 2014 5:39 PM Author: racy violet plaza ALl of these things you are posting are irrelevant. It doesn't matter if the sex pools shrink. It doesn't matter if women have fewer men to fuck. It does not matter how many men or women die early, or die virgins.
If there is sex being had between men and women, and if there number of men and women in the world is about the same, then both sexes will have the same mean number of sexual partners. The ratio of the sexually active pool does not matter unless you are measuring something other than the mean number of sexual partners that men and women have. |
|
Date: February 4th, 2014 5:42 PM Author: startling hall sandwich She doesn't want to feel like she lost the argument, so she will continue fabricating external factors and other bullshit until you get bored and stop responding. Then she will eventually get the last comment and "win" the thread. This will help her maintain the delusion that she's really smart and all will be well. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2486444&forum_id=2#24956836) |
|
Date: February 4th, 2014 5:42 PM Author: Adventurous coldplay fan hissy fit (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2486444&forum_id=2#24956837) |
|
Date: February 4th, 2014 5:52 PM Author: silver ceo indirect expression You're starting from the wrong premise.
You would be right if sex partnership were a closed, 1:1 system with an exactly equal number of males to available females.
This is not, however, the case, (for a great number of reasons)and why the NIH and all statistics compiled over time demonstrate men have more sexual partners.
Yes, there is a female partner for every male sexual act, but these female partners are coming from a larger pool available to men. Thus, men statistically will have access to more partners(and thus more partnerings) than women. |
|
Date: February 4th, 2014 5:55 PM Author: olive curious state toilet seat (living in a world where there are significantly different numbers of men and women) (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2486444&forum_id=2#24956914) |
|
Date: February 4th, 2014 5:58 PM Author: racy violet plaza I am starting from the only premise that matters, the premise in the OP. There are an equal number of men and women in the world. We are not measuring sexually active or married men and women. We are measuring all men and women.
Closed system doesn't mean anything. You can predict based on medians that a random sexually active man will have had more sexual partners than a sexually active woman.
But that is not the issue or the premise. The premise is the mean number of partners across a population will be the same, and that is a tautology. |
|
Date: February 4th, 2014 6:04 PM Author: Adventurous coldplay fan hissy fit ether noun : the shit that makes your soul burn slow |
|
Date: February 4th, 2014 6:05 PM Author: olive curious state toilet seat (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2486444&forum_id=2#24956969) |
|
Date: February 4th, 2014 6:07 PM Author: Chest-beating mildly autistic depressive actually a fairly good point (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2486444&forum_id=2#24956980) |
|
Date: February 4th, 2014 6:12 PM Author: silver ceo indirect expression No, Earl, there is no premise in the OP - we are debating the veracity/accuracy of NIH self-reporting studies, which are arguably all of sexually-active people(or persons of an age where sexual activity is possible). To depart, in this analysis, from that population as a starting point would be to distort the evidence.
If we were to measure means across entire populations, you may be right (or much closer to it), because, well, some babies and sexually inactive persons could balance things out. This is not what that study purports to measure, however.
For the sake of clarity, if you're saying the mean across ALL PEOPLE(including babies & comatose individuals) of any age of either sex is the same, then yes, that is almost certainly true. But that's 1) an irrelevant statistic 2)not what the study measures and 3)disingenuous to argue in light of 2.
|
|
Date: February 4th, 2014 6:30 PM Author: racy violet plaza Julia, the whole point of the thread is that you missed the point of the OP which was clearly to make a joke about you ignoring a logical tautology in favor of an NIH study that is measuring something different than what everyone else in this thread is talking about.
By pushing the point and introducing different data and different measurements, you are just feeding the claim that you are stubborn and aspie. If you had seen the joke in the original OP, you would not have posted the first response. |
|
Date: February 4th, 2014 10:25 PM Author: twinkling self-centered hominid striped hyena JFC. Never marrying would be equivalent to being a virgin. The average number of hetero marriages across the sexes would still be the same.
You can have more men be virgins than females but still have the same average sex partners. |
|
Date: February 4th, 2014 5:16 PM Author: Cobalt Community Account TY 180 (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2486444&forum_id=2#24956649) |
|
Date: February 4th, 2014 5:16 PM Author: Exhilarant orchid really tough guy electric furnace Oh god no (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2486444&forum_id=2#24956653) |
|
Date: February 4th, 2014 5:17 PM Author: Dull razzle-dazzle regret (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2486444&forum_id=2#24956658) |
|
Date: February 4th, 2014 5:18 PM Author: Vibrant geriatric internal respiration abode you might still be able to redeem yourself if you quietly admit you are wrong, and retire for the next 6 months (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2486444&forum_id=2#24956662) |
|
Date: February 4th, 2014 5:39 PM Author: startling hall sandwich This is like the 3rd or 4th time I have seen you just start making shit up to support a position that is demonstrably wrong. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2486444&forum_id=2#24956813) |
|
Date: February 4th, 2014 5:40 PM Author: Dull razzle-dazzle regret that's actually a sign of high IQ (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2486444&forum_id=2#24956826) |
|
Date: February 4th, 2014 5:47 PM Author: Adventurous coldplay fan hissy fit (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2486444&forum_id=2#24956873) |
|
Date: February 4th, 2014 5:47 PM Author: Chest-beating mildly autistic depressive (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2486444&forum_id=2#24956874) |
|
Date: February 4th, 2014 6:28 PM Author: sadistic mediation shrine lol (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2486444&forum_id=2#24957115) |
|
Date: February 4th, 2014 10:22 PM Author: twinkling self-centered hominid striped hyena (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2486444&forum_id=2#24958510) |
|
Date: March 2nd, 2014 4:25 PM Author: Cobalt Community Account (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2486444&forum_id=2#25115473) |
|
Date: September 30th, 2014 1:06 PM Author: sadistic mediation shrine (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2486444&forum_id=2#26428056) |
|
Date: February 4th, 2014 6:28 PM Author: sadistic mediation shrine oh, my . . . (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2486444&forum_id=2#24957112) |
|
Date: February 4th, 2014 10:24 PM Author: vivacious plum jew holy shit, i really wanted to be on your side this time. Why do you do this? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2486444&forum_id=2#24958532) |
|
Date: February 4th, 2014 4:54 PM Author: Impertinent house She's probably right bro. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2486444&forum_id=2#24956507) |
|
Date: February 4th, 2014 4:55 PM Author: racy violet plaza (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2486444&forum_id=2#24956516) |
|
Date: February 4th, 2014 4:59 PM Author: Exhilarant orchid really tough guy electric furnace Gays (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2486444&forum_id=2#24956543) |
|
Date: February 4th, 2014 5:02 PM Author: Dull razzle-dazzle regret LOL (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2486444&forum_id=2#24956566) |
|
Date: February 4th, 2014 5:06 PM Author: gold electric church building wrinkle it's not really news that julia has a child-like grip on how stats work and the information they tend to convey. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2486444&forum_id=2#24956579) |
|
Date: February 4th, 2014 5:08 PM Author: Cobalt Community Account if fucklaw is her baby daddy, the children's IQ will not regress to the mean (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2486444&forum_id=2#24956591) |
|
Date: February 4th, 2014 5:12 PM Author: gold electric church building wrinkle just do racist ugly little toad bro + batshit tranny-faced pathological liar = average XO poster (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2486444&forum_id=2#24956610) |
|
Date: July 28th, 2014 4:20 PM Author: arousing tantric half-breed (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2486444&forum_id=2#26016613) |
|
Date: February 4th, 2014 5:06 PM Author: histrionic dark son of senegal hey Julia how's married life? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2486444&forum_id=2#24956584) |
|
Date: February 4th, 2014 5:09 PM Author: glittery patrolman french chef did julia and deeh ever bang? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2486444&forum_id=2#24956593) |
|
Date: February 4th, 2014 5:25 PM Author: Cobalt Community Account Julia can u post the math prereqs for matriculating at thunderbird bidness school? I'm curious (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2486444&forum_id=2#24956698) |
|
Date: February 4th, 2014 5:34 PM Author: Dull razzle-dazzle regret julia absolutely pwning souls ITT (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2486444&forum_id=2#24956765) |
|
Date: February 4th, 2014 5:48 PM Author: Khaki ticket booth No no no guys, you don't get it. Only julia understands that it's NOT A CLOSED SYSTEM. Didn't you see her results from www.myfreeiqtestcenter.net? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2486444&forum_id=2#24956876) |
|
Date: February 4th, 2014 5:52 PM Author: olive curious state toilet seat maybe she's just more used to mfm than you are?
edit: is there a word yet for bias against poly amorous relationships? |
|
Date: February 4th, 2014 10:22 PM Author: twinkling self-centered hominid striped hyena lmao. Even an mfm wouldn't change the result if you're discussing mean. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2486444&forum_id=2#24958506) |
|
Date: February 4th, 2014 5:55 PM Author: Fragrant confused point 145 IQ Julia OWNING here. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2486444&forum_id=2#24956915) |
|
Date: February 4th, 2014 6:31 PM Author: sadistic mediation shrine just gonna leave this here: http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1358738&forum_id=2 (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2486444&forum_id=2#24957133) |
|
Date: February 4th, 2014 6:38 PM Author: sadistic mediation shrine don't forget that this is here btw (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2486444&forum_id=2#24957184) |
|
Date: February 4th, 2014 6:43 PM Author: aromatic kitchen OMG (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2486444&forum_id=2#24957219) |
|
Date: February 4th, 2014 6:49 PM Author: racy violet plaza this really is one of the greatest things ever:
http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1358738&forum_id=2#15429731 |
|
Date: February 4th, 2014 10:29 PM Author: twinkling self-centered hominid striped hyena Holy fuck, didn't she have to study for the GMAT??? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2486444&forum_id=2#24958560) |
|
Date: February 5th, 2014 4:49 AM Author: Ruddy big indian lodge prole she went to thunderbird (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2486444&forum_id=2#24959985) |
|
Date: February 5th, 2014 9:48 AM Author: Adventurous coldplay fan hissy fit GOAT flame (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2486444&forum_id=2#24960465) |
|
Date: February 4th, 2014 7:17 PM Author: glittery patrolman french chef what the fuck (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2486444&forum_id=2#24957423) |
|
Date: February 4th, 2014 7:21 PM Author: floppy jade rigor piazza i wish she'd mentioned which restaurants take miles at one mile per dollar, b/c i would eat at those restaurants (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2486444&forum_id=2#24957442) |
|
Date: February 4th, 2014 7:26 PM Author: swashbuckling fanboi even 10 cents on the dollar is amazing...if that existed. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2486444&forum_id=2#24957473) |
|
Date: February 5th, 2014 4:27 AM Author: Big-titted underhanded dilemma holy shit i don't know what to do (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2486444&forum_id=2#24959949) |
|
Date: February 4th, 2014 10:04 PM Author: Vibrant geriatric internal respiration abode (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2486444&forum_id=2#24958390) |
|
Date: February 4th, 2014 10:23 PM Author: Maniacal talented corner rasquie come itt and explain to julia how numbers work (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2486444&forum_id=2#24958515) |
|
Date: February 4th, 2014 10:26 PM Author: twinkling self-centered hominid striped hyena LMAO, I REALLY want to see this. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2486444&forum_id=2#24958544) |
|
Date: February 5th, 2014 3:28 AM Author: sickened charismatic sneaky criminal hairy legs maybe in the not-too-distant past there were a lot of really slutty cougars who have since died off?
I'm trying, here... |
|
Date: February 5th, 2014 4:04 AM Author: Misanthropic newt faggot firefighter lol, Julia is definitely flaming.
She argued exactly what you guys are saying several years ago. I remember the thread. She said that no matter what, the average man and the average woman have the same number of sex partners within a population. |
|
Date: February 5th, 2014 4:04 AM Author: pearl violent associate she isn't flaming, just very dumb (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2486444&forum_id=2#24959898) |
|
Date: February 5th, 2014 6:24 AM Author: Khaki ticket booth this never happened (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2486444&forum_id=2#24960154) |
|
Date: February 5th, 2014 9:27 AM Author: twinkling self-centered hominid striped hyena Link? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2486444&forum_id=2#24960397) |
|
Date: February 5th, 2014 6:22 AM Author: beady-eyed balding heaven party of the first part Thunderbird called, Julia; they asked that you never mention attending there again (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2486444&forum_id=2#24960152) |
|
Date: March 28th, 2014 11:29 AM Author: Anal iridescent locus sound barrier (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2486444&forum_id=2#25277630) |
|
Date: March 28th, 2014 11:29 AM Author: orange mind-boggling incel lololol (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2486444&forum_id=2#25277632) |
|
Date: March 28th, 2014 11:30 AM Author: bronze trailer park lol killshot (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2486444&forum_id=2#25277639) |
|
Date: March 28th, 2014 11:29 AM Author: Frisky mint tattoo property It's all about closed systems (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2486444&forum_id=2#25277638) |
|
Date: July 28th, 2014 4:22 PM Author: slimy haunting site doctorate Mathematically, this requires that more men than women not have sex at all or that some class of sexually active men is cucking all the other men... Which is THE CASE so this makes sense. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2486444&forum_id=2#26016625) |
|
Date: July 31st, 2014 1:06 PM Author: arousing tantric half-breed (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2486444&forum_id=2#26035308) |
|
Date: July 31st, 2014 1:11 PM Author: pearl violent associate it isn't a closed system (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2486444&forum_id=2#26035337) |
|
Date: September 30th, 2014 1:15 PM Author: Doobsian bateful death wish rigpig right. when you consider gays and people who don't have sex, it's totally possible for one gender to have more partners on average than the other. was this thread supposed to be some sort of epic self-pwn? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2486444&forum_id=2#26428114) |
|
Date: September 30th, 2014 1:16 PM Author: silver ceo indirect expression Yep. That's what I said above. It's not a closed system, for a great number of reasons. XO is just stupid. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2486444&forum_id=2#26428124) |
|
Date: September 30th, 2014 1:20 PM Author: Shaky elastic band oh good let's do this one all over again. gl (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2486444&forum_id=2#26428154) |