Choosing Biglaw SA
| Onyx office | 08/17/17 | | concupiscible tripping toaster | 08/17/17 | | Onyx office | 08/17/17 | | concupiscible tripping toaster | 08/17/17 | | fragrant azure school | 08/17/17 | | blathering provocative chapel elastic band | 08/17/17 | | concupiscible tripping toaster | 08/17/17 | | fragrant azure school | 08/17/17 | | blathering provocative chapel elastic band | 08/17/17 | | Vigorous Plaza | 08/17/17 | | blathering provocative chapel elastic band | 08/17/17 | | Vigorous Plaza | 08/17/17 | | blathering provocative chapel elastic band | 08/17/17 | | Vigorous Plaza | 08/17/17 | | fragrant azure school | 08/17/17 | | blathering provocative chapel elastic band | 08/17/17 | | fragrant azure school | 08/17/17 | | blathering provocative chapel elastic band | 08/17/17 | | turquoise exhilarant space | 08/17/17 | | Vibrant temple filthpig | 08/17/17 | | Orange Area Jewess | 08/17/17 | | Vibrant temple filthpig | 08/17/17 | | Vigorous Plaza | 08/17/17 | | blathering provocative chapel elastic band | 08/17/17 | | high-end macaca | 08/17/17 | | blathering provocative chapel elastic band | 08/17/17 | | Onyx office | 08/17/17 | | high-end macaca | 08/17/17 | | Dun dashing shitlib knife | 08/17/17 | | Slate associate pocket flask | 08/17/17 | | jet-lagged amber field brethren | 08/17/17 | | Cowardly medicated native | 08/17/17 | | Onyx office | 08/17/17 | | jet-lagged amber field brethren | 08/17/17 | | Onyx office | 08/17/17 | | jet-lagged amber field brethren | 08/17/17 | | appetizing tan azn faggotry | 08/17/17 | | Onyx office | 08/17/17 | | Vibrant temple filthpig | 08/17/17 | | Cracking Gas Station Candlestick Maker | 08/17/17 | | Onyx office | 08/17/17 | | turquoise exhilarant space | 08/17/17 | | Onyx office | 08/19/17 | | primrose sanctuary milk | 08/17/17 | | soul-stirring site | 08/17/17 | | blathering provocative chapel elastic band | 08/17/17 | | rose really tough guy nibblets | 08/17/17 | | blathering provocative chapel elastic band | 08/17/17 | | rose really tough guy nibblets | 08/17/17 | | blathering provocative chapel elastic band | 08/17/17 | | rose really tough guy nibblets | 08/17/17 | | insanely creepy house | 08/17/17 | | blathering provocative chapel elastic band | 08/17/17 | | insanely creepy house | 08/17/17 | | primrose sanctuary milk | 08/17/17 | | soul-stirring site | 08/17/17 | | rose really tough guy nibblets | 08/17/17 | | soul-stirring site | 08/17/17 | | rose really tough guy nibblets | 08/17/17 | | soul-stirring site | 08/17/17 | | rose really tough guy nibblets | 08/17/17 | | soul-stirring site | 08/17/17 | | Adventurous plum theatre idea he suggested | 08/17/17 | | primrose sanctuary milk | 08/17/17 | | soul-stirring site | 08/17/17 | | primrose sanctuary milk | 08/17/17 | | Adventurous plum theatre idea he suggested | 08/17/17 | | turquoise exhilarant space | 08/17/17 |
Poast new message in this thread
 |
Date: August 17th, 2017 7:56 PM Author: Vigorous Plaza
You can get equal experience at the firms, but what Nutella is talking about is that for in-house you're normally interviewing for a specialized area (not some general corporate position) so your firm's prestige/reputation w/r/t that specialized area is important, i.e., specialized area >>> vault ranking when interviewing for inhouse. So, like, you've probably never heard of Seward & Kissel, but if you're doing fund work they are about as good as any other shop.
Once you go in-house, attorneys don't want to train someone from the ground up. Sure, there is some leeway, but not much. They'll figure, shit I can get a K&E associate but then I'd have to train them to do X type of work, and what if they hate it. Ohh fuck it, I'll just go with Firm Y that is known for it b/c the fucker already knows the basics and likes it enough to practice in that area.
I'm training a junior attorney that we copped straight out of LS. And, it's been a real pain in the ass. My boss just says, "CC Special, you can help him right? Work with him." Fuck me. I can see that his eyes glaze over when I talk about various fed regs.
Edit: But if you don't know what the fuck you want to do, it's generally a safe bet to go with the highest rank firm that you can somewhat tolerate (e.g., location, etc.)
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3704162&forum_id=2#34014219) |
Date: August 17th, 2017 3:55 PM Author: Vigorous Plaza
Prestige firm does matter to a certain extent, but if you're looking at V10s, then you can prbly just pick anyone and be fine. You may want to focus on practice group/ranking, which will be more important once you look going inhouse. I know some firms do a rotation system, which kinda sets you back a bit.
Going in-house will depend a lot on experience and personality. I'd rather take someone from a lower ranked firm that has relevant experience and a decent personality than some douche with so-so experience from a V5.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3704162&forum_id=2#34012546) |
Date: August 17th, 2017 3:58 PM Author: blathering provocative chapel elastic band
>>Should I just choose the most prestigious firm?
yes, unless one is known as a particular hellhole
>>Do firms like cravath or the other v5 firms provide associates with an easier time lateraling or going inhouse?
#5 v #6, no. there isnt some magical v5 cutuff.
v5 vs. shitty biglaw, yes.
>>Is there really any difference between firms in terms of the amount of work or responsiveness that's required?
all this will be heavily dependent on who you end up working for. absolutely no way to predict.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3704162&forum_id=2#34012564) |
Date: August 17th, 2017 10:27 PM Author: Adventurous plum theatre idea he suggested
NYC litigation ranking?
PW, DPW, &c?
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3704162&forum_id=2#34015400) |
|
|