Choosing Biglaw SA
| Racy Buck-toothed Windowlicker Keepsake Machete | 08/17/17 | | light stage | 08/17/17 | | Racy Buck-toothed Windowlicker Keepsake Machete | 08/17/17 | | light stage | 08/17/17 | | Ultramarine Heady Crackhouse Blood Rage | 08/17/17 | | Rebellious Shrine | 08/17/17 | | light stage | 08/17/17 | | Ultramarine Heady Crackhouse Blood Rage | 08/17/17 | | Rebellious Shrine | 08/17/17 | | cruel-hearted theater stage | 08/17/17 | | Rebellious Shrine | 08/17/17 | | cruel-hearted theater stage | 08/17/17 | | Rebellious Shrine | 08/17/17 | | cruel-hearted theater stage | 08/17/17 | | Ultramarine Heady Crackhouse Blood Rage | 08/17/17 | | Rebellious Shrine | 08/17/17 | | Ultramarine Heady Crackhouse Blood Rage | 08/17/17 | | Rebellious Shrine | 08/17/17 | | Plum Brunch | 08/17/17 | | hot razzle range | 08/17/17 | | Wild Menage Boiling Water | 08/17/17 | | hot razzle range | 08/17/17 | | cruel-hearted theater stage | 08/17/17 | | Rebellious Shrine | 08/17/17 | | deranged preventive strike therapy | 08/17/17 | | Rebellious Shrine | 08/17/17 | | Racy Buck-toothed Windowlicker Keepsake Machete | 08/17/17 | | deranged preventive strike therapy | 08/17/17 | | Electric Persian Station | 08/17/17 | | vengeful erotic nibblets | 08/17/17 | | Dark hunting ground | 08/17/17 | | Soggy Smoky Partner Hairy Legs | 08/17/17 | | Racy Buck-toothed Windowlicker Keepsake Machete | 08/17/17 | | Dark hunting ground | 08/17/17 | | Racy Buck-toothed Windowlicker Keepsake Machete | 08/17/17 | | Dark hunting ground | 08/17/17 | | Bull headed cruise ship | 08/17/17 | | Racy Buck-toothed Windowlicker Keepsake Machete | 08/17/17 | | hot razzle range | 08/17/17 | | Coiffed jew | 08/17/17 | | Racy Buck-toothed Windowlicker Keepsake Machete | 08/17/17 | | Plum Brunch | 08/17/17 | | Racy Buck-toothed Windowlicker Keepsake Machete | 08/19/17 | | Rambunctious Halford | 08/17/17 | | Green concupiscible macaca | 08/17/17 | | Rebellious Shrine | 08/17/17 | | odious dun abode | 08/17/17 | | Rebellious Shrine | 08/17/17 | | odious dun abode | 08/17/17 | | Rebellious Shrine | 08/17/17 | | odious dun abode | 08/17/17 | | provocative insane corner | 08/17/17 | | Rebellious Shrine | 08/17/17 | | provocative insane corner | 08/17/17 | | Rambunctious Halford | 08/17/17 | | Green concupiscible macaca | 08/17/17 | | odious dun abode | 08/17/17 | | Green concupiscible macaca | 08/17/17 | | odious dun abode | 08/17/17 | | Green concupiscible macaca | 08/17/17 | | odious dun abode | 08/17/17 | | Green concupiscible macaca | 08/17/17 | | Adulterous milk | 08/17/17 | | Rambunctious Halford | 08/17/17 | | Green concupiscible macaca | 08/17/17 | | Rambunctious Halford | 08/17/17 | | Adulterous milk | 08/17/17 | | Plum Brunch | 08/17/17 |
Poast new message in this thread
 |
Date: August 17th, 2017 7:56 PM Author: cruel-hearted theater stage
You can get equal experience at the firms, but what Nutella is talking about is that for in-house you're normally interviewing for a specialized area (not some general corporate position) so your firm's prestige/reputation w/r/t that specialized area is important, i.e., specialized area >>> vault ranking when interviewing for inhouse. So, like, you've probably never heard of Seward & Kissel, but if you're doing fund work they are about as good as any other shop.
Once you go in-house, attorneys don't want to train someone from the ground up. Sure, there is some leeway, but not much. They'll figure, shit I can get a K&E associate but then I'd have to train them to do X type of work, and what if they hate it. Ohh fuck it, I'll just go with Firm Y that is known for it b/c the fucker already knows the basics and likes it enough to practice in that area.
I'm training a junior attorney that we copped straight out of LS. And, it's been a real pain in the ass. My boss just says, "CC Special, you can help him right? Work with him." Fuck me. I can see that his eyes glaze over when I talk about various fed regs.
Edit: But if you don't know what the fuck you want to do, it's generally a safe bet to go with the highest rank firm that you can somewhat tolerate (e.g., location, etc.)
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3704162&forum_id=2#34014219) |
Date: August 17th, 2017 3:55 PM Author: cruel-hearted theater stage
Prestige firm does matter to a certain extent, but if you're looking at V10s, then you can prbly just pick anyone and be fine. You may want to focus on practice group/ranking, which will be more important once you look going inhouse. I know some firms do a rotation system, which kinda sets you back a bit.
Going in-house will depend a lot on experience and personality. I'd rather take someone from a lower ranked firm that has relevant experience and a decent personality than some douche with so-so experience from a V5.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3704162&forum_id=2#34012546) |
Date: August 17th, 2017 3:58 PM Author: Rebellious Shrine
>>Should I just choose the most prestigious firm?
yes, unless one is known as a particular hellhole
>>Do firms like cravath or the other v5 firms provide associates with an easier time lateraling or going inhouse?
#5 v #6, no. there isnt some magical v5 cutuff.
v5 vs. shitty biglaw, yes.
>>Is there really any difference between firms in terms of the amount of work or responsiveness that's required?
all this will be heavily dependent on who you end up working for. absolutely no way to predict.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3704162&forum_id=2#34012564) |
Date: August 17th, 2017 10:27 PM Author: Adulterous milk
NYC litigation ranking?
PW, DPW, &c?
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3704162&forum_id=2#34015400) |
|
|