Choosing Biglaw SA
| milky point | 08/17/17 | | Bearded purple range | 08/17/17 | | milky point | 08/17/17 | | Bearded purple range | 08/17/17 | | exhilarant buff field | 08/17/17 | | shaky private investor | 08/17/17 | | Bearded purple range | 08/17/17 | | exhilarant buff field | 08/17/17 | | shaky private investor | 08/17/17 | | supple bbw | 08/17/17 | | shaky private investor | 08/17/17 | | supple bbw | 08/17/17 | | shaky private investor | 08/17/17 | | supple bbw | 08/17/17 | | exhilarant buff field | 08/17/17 | | shaky private investor | 08/17/17 | | exhilarant buff field | 08/17/17 | | shaky private investor | 08/17/17 | | Lime motley ladyboy partner | 08/17/17 | | razzle dilemma | 08/17/17 | | Khaki station jap | 08/17/17 | | razzle dilemma | 08/17/17 | | supple bbw | 08/17/17 | | shaky private investor | 08/17/17 | | House-broken location | 08/17/17 | | shaky private investor | 08/17/17 | | milky point | 08/17/17 | | House-broken location | 08/17/17 | | razzmatazz zippy marketing idea | 08/17/17 | | yapping site scourge upon the earth | 08/17/17 | | brass soul-stirring puppy mood | 08/17/17 | | rebellious market | 08/17/17 | | milky point | 08/17/17 | | brass soul-stirring puppy mood | 08/17/17 | | milky point | 08/17/17 | | brass soul-stirring puppy mood | 08/17/17 | | cerebral dun masturbator | 08/17/17 | | milky point | 08/17/17 | | razzle dilemma | 08/17/17 | | sooty national telephone | 08/17/17 | | milky point | 08/17/17 | | Lime motley ladyboy partner | 08/17/17 | | milky point | 08/19/17 | | thriller charcoal theater persian | 08/17/17 | | Bistre garrison | 08/17/17 | | shaky private investor | 08/17/17 | | buck-toothed center sex offender | 08/17/17 | | shaky private investor | 08/17/17 | | buck-toothed center sex offender | 08/17/17 | | shaky private investor | 08/17/17 | | buck-toothed center sex offender | 08/17/17 | | adulterous trailer park | 08/17/17 | | shaky private investor | 08/17/17 | | adulterous trailer park | 08/17/17 | | thriller charcoal theater persian | 08/17/17 | | Bistre garrison | 08/17/17 | | buck-toothed center sex offender | 08/17/17 | | Bistre garrison | 08/17/17 | | buck-toothed center sex offender | 08/17/17 | | Bistre garrison | 08/17/17 | | buck-toothed center sex offender | 08/17/17 | | Bistre garrison | 08/17/17 | | big haunted graveyard hominid | 08/17/17 | | thriller charcoal theater persian | 08/17/17 | | Bistre garrison | 08/17/17 | | thriller charcoal theater persian | 08/17/17 | | big haunted graveyard hominid | 08/17/17 | | Lime motley ladyboy partner | 08/17/17 |
Poast new message in this thread
 |
Date: August 17th, 2017 7:56 PM Author: supple bbw
You can get equal experience at the firms, but what Nutella is talking about is that for in-house you're normally interviewing for a specialized area (not some general corporate position) so your firm's prestige/reputation w/r/t that specialized area is important, i.e., specialized area >>> vault ranking when interviewing for inhouse. So, like, you've probably never heard of Seward & Kissel, but if you're doing fund work they are about as good as any other shop.
Once you go in-house, attorneys don't want to train someone from the ground up. Sure, there is some leeway, but not much. They'll figure, shit I can get a K&E associate but then I'd have to train them to do X type of work, and what if they hate it. Ohh fuck it, I'll just go with Firm Y that is known for it b/c the fucker already knows the basics and likes it enough to practice in that area.
I'm training a junior attorney that we copped straight out of LS. And, it's been a real pain in the ass. My boss just says, "CC Special, you can help him right? Work with him." Fuck me. I can see that his eyes glaze over when I talk about various fed regs.
Edit: But if you don't know what the fuck you want to do, it's generally a safe bet to go with the highest rank firm that you can somewhat tolerate (e.g., location, etc.)
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3704162&forum_id=2#34014219) |
Date: August 17th, 2017 3:55 PM Author: supple bbw
Prestige firm does matter to a certain extent, but if you're looking at V10s, then you can prbly just pick anyone and be fine. You may want to focus on practice group/ranking, which will be more important once you look going inhouse. I know some firms do a rotation system, which kinda sets you back a bit.
Going in-house will depend a lot on experience and personality. I'd rather take someone from a lower ranked firm that has relevant experience and a decent personality than some douche with so-so experience from a V5.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3704162&forum_id=2#34012546) |
Date: August 17th, 2017 3:58 PM Author: shaky private investor
>>Should I just choose the most prestigious firm?
yes, unless one is known as a particular hellhole
>>Do firms like cravath or the other v5 firms provide associates with an easier time lateraling or going inhouse?
#5 v #6, no. there isnt some magical v5 cutuff.
v5 vs. shitty biglaw, yes.
>>Is there really any difference between firms in terms of the amount of work or responsiveness that's required?
all this will be heavily dependent on who you end up working for. absolutely no way to predict.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3704162&forum_id=2#34012564) |
Date: August 17th, 2017 10:27 PM Author: big haunted graveyard hominid
NYC litigation ranking?
PW, DPW, &c?
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3704162&forum_id=2#34015400) |
|
|