Ragnus, do you remember me telling you to knock it off?
| vigorous violent plaza toaster | 10/18/17 | | Magenta brunch | 10/18/17 | | Soul-stirring resort | 10/18/17 | | Spruce Mexican School | 10/18/17 | | vigorous violent plaza toaster | 10/19/17 | | beady-eyed slippery alpha property | 10/18/17 | | vigorous violent plaza toaster | 10/19/17 | | Clear Selfie | 10/18/17 | | ocher odious church building prole | 10/18/17 | | Appetizing Voyeur | 10/18/17 | | vigorous violent plaza toaster | 10/18/17 | | Appetizing Voyeur | 10/18/17 | | vigorous violent plaza toaster | 10/18/17 | | Appetizing Voyeur | 10/18/17 | | vigorous violent plaza toaster | 10/18/17 | | Appetizing Voyeur | 10/18/17 | | mind-boggling startled house candlestick maker | 10/18/17 | | Appetizing Voyeur | 10/18/17 | | vigorous violent plaza toaster | 10/18/17 | | bateful puppy police squad | 10/18/17 | | Garnet Nubile Tanning Salon Degenerate | 10/18/17 | | vigorous violent plaza toaster | 10/18/17 | | Garnet Nubile Tanning Salon Degenerate | 10/18/17 | | heady foreskin digit ratio | 10/19/17 | | mind-boggling startled house candlestick maker | 10/18/17 | | Soul-stirring resort | 10/18/17 | | supple sanctuary | 10/18/17 | | Appetizing Voyeur | 10/18/17 | | vigorous violent plaza toaster | 10/18/17 | | Talented Free-loading State | 10/18/17 | | Territorial dopamine | 10/18/17 | | cracking arrogant goal in life | 10/18/17 | | Crawly laughsome site gunner | 10/18/17 | | vigorous violent plaza toaster | 10/18/17 | | Appetizing Voyeur | 10/18/17 | | Crawly laughsome site gunner | 10/18/17 | | Appetizing Voyeur | 10/18/17 | | vigorous violent plaza toaster | 10/18/17 | | Appetizing Voyeur | 10/18/17 | | vigorous violent plaza toaster | 10/18/17 | | Appetizing Voyeur | 10/18/17 | | vigorous violent plaza toaster | 10/18/17 | | Appetizing Voyeur | 10/18/17 | | vigorous violent plaza toaster | 10/18/17 | | lavender greedy stage | 10/19/17 | | Appetizing Voyeur | 10/18/17 | | vigorous violent plaza toaster | 10/18/17 | | Crawly laughsome site gunner | 10/18/17 | | vigorous violent plaza toaster | 10/18/17 | | Crawly laughsome site gunner | 10/18/17 | | vigorous violent plaza toaster | 10/18/17 | | Crawly laughsome site gunner | 10/18/17 | | vigorous violent plaza toaster | 10/18/17 | | Appetizing Voyeur | 10/18/17 | | vigorous violent plaza toaster | 10/18/17 | | Appetizing Voyeur | 10/18/17 | | vigorous violent plaza toaster | 10/18/17 | | Bronze Electric Furnace | 10/18/17 | | Crawly laughsome site gunner | 10/18/17 | | vigorous violent plaza toaster | 10/18/17 | | vigorous violent plaza toaster | 10/18/17 | | Appetizing Voyeur | 10/18/17 | | vigorous violent plaza toaster | 10/18/17 | | Appetizing Voyeur | 10/18/17 | | Appetizing Voyeur | 10/18/17 | | vigorous violent plaza toaster | 10/18/17 | | Ultramarine self-centered national stain | 10/18/17 | | Crawly laughsome site gunner | 10/18/17 | | vigorous violent plaza toaster | 10/18/17 | | Appetizing Voyeur | 10/18/17 | | vigorous violent plaza toaster | 10/18/17 | | Crawly laughsome site gunner | 10/18/17 | | vigorous violent plaza toaster | 10/18/17 | | Crawly laughsome site gunner | 10/18/17 | | vigorous violent plaza toaster | 10/18/17 | | Crawly laughsome site gunner | 10/18/17 | | vigorous violent plaza toaster | 10/18/17 | | Appetizing Voyeur | 10/18/17 | | Crawly laughsome site gunner | 10/18/17 | | Salmon forum famous landscape painting | 10/19/17 | | Multi-colored disrespectful becky | 10/19/17 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: October 18th, 2017 6:18 PM Author: vigorous violent plaza toaster
I said what you are doing constitutes DV and "you are going to get dvtro pwnd." Do you remember? And what happened? You got dvtro pwnd.
You were harassing her, bro. And if it wasn't for the DVTRO, you would still be harassing her.
A DVTRO is meant to give people like you a "cooling down period." That is the actual policy behind these.
Based on your recent postings, you clearly have not cooled down even a little bit.
The judge SHOULD grant a permanent DVRO against you for three years. One year may be enough, but if I were a judge, I'd want to play it safe so I'd ding you with a three year.
This is coming from an attorney with an insanely strong defense bias. You are GUILTY. You HARASSED her. You DESERVE a DVRO.
Take the deal you stupid moron retarded tweaker brained fuck.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3767983&forum_id=2#34473747) |
Date: October 18th, 2017 6:26 PM Author: Appetizing Voyeur
I remember. And disagree with you that what I did was DV. You don’t know the whole case.
I want this marriage off my record. So I’m not going to drop the annulment in exchange of her dropping DVRO. I have a very good lawyer who will LITIGATE and grant me a JUDICIAL DISMISDAL of this non sense.
100k is nothing. I can always make money, but only one chance to stand up to this bully.
She engaged in significant FRAUD which we are discovery. We are more interested in exposing those fraud on record, than using it as leverage for negotiations. DVRO does not scare me one bit.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3767983&forum_id=2#34473804) |
|
Date: October 18th, 2017 6:39 PM Author: vigorous violent plaza toaster
That's a stupid analogy. A better analogy would be the tank is coming for your village, you know you are going to get blown up and the tank is giving you a chance to escape without harm, just pack up your shit and go.
You, however, don't want to leave you shit because it is YOURS. You bought it, you paid for it, and you want to stand up to the tank to send a message to the other villagers who will be faced with tanks.
So the tank mows you and your village down, you are dead, but, hey, you stood up for your rights!
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3767983&forum_id=2#34473915) |
|
Date: October 18th, 2017 6:57 PM Author: vigorous violent plaza toaster
Yes. Another reason not to have it on your record is that a DV is one of the very few things that can be used against you in future DV cases.
So when he does this again (and he will), his future gf's lawyer will just present this current case as evidence of his guilt in an unrelated case.
He has an opportunity to walk away from this, but as another poster pointed out in a different thread, Ragnus isn't over this girl and that is what this is really about.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3767983&forum_id=2#34474055) |
|
Date: October 19th, 2017 12:07 PM Author: heady foreskin digit ratio
1) you harassed her, for sure, in a classic DV pattern.
2) your retarded shitlawyer isn't capable of 'granting' you anything. this kind of chest-beating "my lawyer will crush you" horseshit is also typical of histrionic DV control freaks incapable of recognizing their own horrid behavior.
3) third DV tell: obsession with stringing her up in court and "exposing" her because she dared take necessary precautions against your unhinged behavior. the first reaction of every screechy, emotional, deranged DV turd is to start victim-blaming and taking a righteous stance.
if your behavior is objectively described to an impartial observer, they uniformly say you are a fucked up dude and that behavior merited some kind of court order. you're going to self-pwn badly in court. your lawyer will let you do it so long as the check clears and then he'll go home and chickle with his wife about how yet another retarded DV client insisted on belly flopping in court.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3767983&forum_id=2#34479017) |
|
Date: October 18th, 2017 7:05 PM Author: vigorous violent plaza toaster
In California there are two criteria:
1. Did the Respondent put the Petitioner in reasonable fear of great bodily harm or death?
2. Did the Respondent "disturb the peace" of Petitioner?
Disturbing the peace, if we are talking about yelling, texting, or emailing, typically needs to occur more than once for a judge to grant a DVRO, but practically you only need two examples to sink someone. If it is bad enough, just one.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3767983&forum_id=2#34474108) |
|
Date: October 18th, 2017 7:07 PM Author: Appetizing Voyeur
i told her to move her shit out of the apartment.
there was no threat of violence in any of my texts.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3767983&forum_id=2#34474116)
|
|
Date: October 18th, 2017 7:33 PM Author: vigorous violent plaza toaster
OFS. For example, Judge Hernandez in South Bay was one of the worst. He would fish for things.
Going back a few years ago, two firms ago, I was defending one and winning.
All of the allegations were based in Mexico so I argued the judge didn't have jurisdiction to grant it. I moved for directed verdict or some shit while the wife was still on the stand.
The judge, I shit you not, turns to her and goes, "Can you think of any incidents in the U.S. where he made you fear for your life?"
The bitch then completely lied and said he threatened to kill her while she was giving birth to their baby in the hospital.
So then I recall her son from another marriage to the stand and get him to admit he never heard such a threat and that he was in the hospital during that birth.
Judge goes, "Well, maybe the son wasn't in the hospital the entire time with his mother."
I could tell you lots of bullshit stories like that.
Judge Hernandez granted a three year RO against an adult woman for throwing a baseball hat at her 70 year old father and saying, "Watch your back." Judge had to ask the father three times whether he feared his daughter and never said yes. Judge still granted the restraining order.
Another one that popped into my head about Judge Hernandez. He granted a restraining order after probing the pro per defendant and getting him to admit he pulled his wedding ring off his wife's finger. That wasn't even in her pleadings, but he was fishing for a reason to grant her RO.
I was in the audience watching that and when I heard the guy admit he pulled the ring off her finger I whispered to my client, "He's fucked."
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3767983&forum_id=2#34474329) |
|
Date: October 18th, 2017 7:08 PM Author: Appetizing Voyeur
yeah.
i just want to see how this thing will play out.
can i get a jury trial, or does the judge decide?
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3767983&forum_id=2#34474125) |
|
Date: October 18th, 2017 7:17 PM Author: Crawly laughsome site gunner
definition of domestic violence:
sexual assault;
.
.
.
.
.
yelling;
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3767983&forum_id=2#34474184) |
|
Date: October 18th, 2017 7:19 PM Author: vigorous violent plaza toaster
I used to get into discussions with lawyers all the time about this. The dude who puts his wife in the hospital with stitches gets the same punishment in family court as the guy who called his wife a cunt in a text. Its insanity.
And most judges hand out DVTROs like candy on Halloween. They are just fishing for an excuse to grant it.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3767983&forum_id=2#34474199)
|
Date: October 19th, 2017 6:15 AM Author: Salmon forum famous landscape painting
180 thread.
why do men get married again?
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3767983&forum_id=2#34477565) |
Date: October 19th, 2017 10:08 AM Author: Multi-colored disrespectful becky
18000000 thread.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3767983&forum_id=2#34478193)
|
|
|