The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
|
 |
 
|
If Trump tweets are used against him, should prezs remain silent for 4 years?
Poast new message in this thread
Date: March 17th, 2018 3:31 PM Author: Mind-boggling Pontificating Tattoo (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3921430&forum_id=2#35626640) |
Date: March 17th, 2018 3:31 PM Author: big-titted crawly faggotry step-uncle's house U can't use tweets against a sitting POTUS because they're not sworn testimony and therefore hearsay. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3921430&forum_id=2#35626645) |
 |
Date: March 17th, 2018 3:35 PM Author: Mind-boggling Pontificating Tattoo Twitter libs are claiming, "prima facie bad faith, he's confessed, checkmate!" (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3921430&forum_id=2#35626656) |
|
Date: March 17th, 2018 3:50 PM Author: arousing black woman lmao you failed evidence right? this is true only if someone else took trump's dictation, tweeted for him, and it was not made in the regular course of business AND wasn't a statement against interest AND wasn't an excited utterance AND (insert twenty other hearsay exceptions that apply)
oh and that "90 days will he make it" isn't hearsay either bc it's not submitted to prove "90 days" is true, it'd be submitted for another reason (i.e., Trump's tweet wasn't "I'm going to fire him because XYZ")
jfc did you miss the whole "i am alive" lesson on like day 2 of evidence |
|
Date: March 17th, 2018 3:57 PM Author: Mind-boggling Pontificating Tattoo Will future Evidence classes in law school use this case since Mueller and Trump team have scholarship? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3921430&forum_id=2#35626774) |
|
Date: March 17th, 2018 4:07 PM Author: big-titted crawly faggotry step-uncle's house Woah there, I think you failed evidence. You've listed hearsay EXCEPTIONS but even if hearsay is admissible due to an exception it's still hearsay. You are NOT engaging in scholarship. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3921430&forum_id=2#35626838) |
|
Date: March 17th, 2018 4:13 PM Author: internet-worthy tripping orchestra pit prole I forget, but isn’t an admission against interest not hearsay under the FRE? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3921430&forum_id=2#35626858) |
|
Date: March 17th, 2018 3:49 PM Author: Mind-boggling Pontificating Tattoo (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3921430&forum_id=2#35626723) |
|
Date: March 17th, 2018 3:58 PM Author: Charcoal roast beef presidents should probably speak carefully in public. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3921430&forum_id=2#35626781) |
|
Date: March 17th, 2018 3:59 PM Author: Mind-boggling Pontificating Tattoo American interests depend on doublespeak. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3921430&forum_id=2#35626796) |
|
Date: March 17th, 2018 4:11 PM Author: Charcoal roast beef there's probably a happy medium between doublespeak and tweeting every damn thing that comes into one's head (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3921430&forum_id=2#35626849) |
|
Date: March 17th, 2018 4:20 PM Author: Mind-boggling Pontificating Tattoo https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argument_to_moderation (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3921430&forum_id=2#35626889) |
|
Date: March 17th, 2018 4:22 PM Author: aphrodisiac alcoholic partner Or maybe just refrain from saying stupid shit. Either or. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3921430&forum_id=2#35626896) |