Should Statutes of Limitations for Rape Be Abolished? Across the country, (nyt)
| Deep Office | 06/19/18 | | alcoholic peach senate | 06/19/18 | | Laughsome Out-of-control Site | 06/19/18 | | Shaky Aquamarine Space Quadroon | 06/19/18 | | puce angry resort | 06/19/18 | | crusty new version | 06/19/18 | | Shaky Aquamarine Space Quadroon | 06/19/18 | | Mischievous shivering box office roast beef | 06/19/18 | | Shaky Aquamarine Space Quadroon | 06/19/18 | | Buff Menage | 06/19/18 | | Cheese-eating Irradiated Meetinghouse Depressive | 06/19/18 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: June 19th, 2018 11:00 AM Author: alcoholic peach senate
I'm sympathetic to the first case she talks about, where there is absolutely a rape, and the police simply don't have a DNA match in the database yet to figure out who it was.
Of course that's not the situation that she is really concerned with.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4005459&forum_id=2#36271410) |
|
Date: June 19th, 2018 11:40 AM Author: Laughsome Out-of-control Site
I feel like some states allow a John Doe DNA profile to be indicted in a case where you have DNA but no match.
Of course, then you have people who think just because there is a 15 year statute of limitations, you should get that time to think about whether you want to “press charges.”
https://m.huffpost.com/us/entry/us_56cb4e5ee4b041136f17b087
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4005459&forum_id=2#36271605) |
Date: June 19th, 2018 11:30 AM Author: Shaky Aquamarine Space Quadroon
"in spite of persuasive evidence or a confession."
So draft an exception that rigorously defines and narrowly accommodates those situations, and I'll take a look at it.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4005459&forum_id=2#36271537)
|
|
|