this is all nonsense

there needs to be someone who just straight up comes out and says what we all fucking know: EVERYONE is racist to some degree. we can either go on pretending we're not and go further into utter insanity, or we can be real.

my money is on society going down the former direction rather than the latter

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4633202&forum_id=2#40986221)

as you age you realize the less everyone says the better

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4633202&forum_id=2#40986228)

so why don't we hash this shit out and talk for real instead of endless nonsense?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4633202&forum_id=2#40986245)

but instead of arguing about all this other bullshit, why don't we get down to brass tax?

we are NEVER going to be able to have a cohesive society until we have actual honest conversations. and those are increasingly impossible to have these days

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4633202&forum_id=2#40986273)

in case you haven't been looking, there's a lot to be outraged about these days

angry people are the only ones who are ever going to change this fucking place. need i remind you that adolf hitler was one angry motherfucker

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4633202&forum_id=2#40986326)

Now, actual racism is bad. This is treating all members of a different race badly because of the color of their skin, which they obviously cannot control. In 2020, very few people are actually racist.

I think what you’re talking about is race realism, otherwise known as reality. This is the inescapable truth that, on average, the races have big differences between them which arose over the course of tens or hundreds of thousands of years, evolving in very different countries and climates. The result of this long evolution process is that blacks have the lowest IQs on average and also have the lowest impulse control and highest propensity towards violence, on average of course.

In a proper society, facts and reality like this would be well known and used to form policy. We would not endlessly pour money into “more programs” and then scratch our heads when the blacks continue to trail intellectually. Or worse, blame “systemic racism” for black failure. What we would do instead is teach blacks to acknowledge their limitations, put them in jobs suitable for their abilities, and then perhaps give them some extra subsidies through taxpayer money if they still needed it. But there’s a 0% chance we enter a sane society in our lifetimes

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4633202&forum_id=2#40986318)

The fact is that “racism” is not the same thing as “race realism.” I am not buying into anyone’s framework or being cucky, because the fact is that the two are separate and distinct concepts. What I am doing is resisting the lib/Jew sophistry which tries to redefine racism as race realism

I also agree with the statement that people should be allowed to associate with whoever they want. That is not racism. As I stated, actual racism is treating people badly on the basis of their skin color, it is bad, but there are very very few actual racists today. Wanting to live or associate with your same race or others who you prefer, is not racism because it is not treating others badly

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4633202&forum_id=2#40986542)

thats an opinion actually.

good luck convincing normal people that discrimination based on race is different than discrimination based on racial "science".

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4633202&forum_id=2#40986554)

racism: not wanting to live around blacks because a black person killed your children

its retarded moralizing appealing to scientism

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4633202&forum_id=2#40986659)

You don’t understand actual racism so I will help you. Here are some examples:

1. Refusing to use a water fountain because a black person drank from it.

2. Calling a black person a stupid nigger and berating them after they make a mistake.

3. Related to #1, refusing to share basically anything with a black with the implied premise being that the object is contaminated after the black touched it. Includes not even shaking their hands.

4. Making derogatory racial comments to blacks in situations where race is irrelevant.

These behaviors used to commonly occur, and it is a good thing they no longer do. It probably sounds like an alien world to you, because actual racism has long been eradicated in America. Your only conception of actual racism is race realism because actual racism is completely foreign to you

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4633202&forum_id=2#40986799)

My definition comes from the context of American history and formerly common behaviors that formed the basis for the first anti racism movements. The behaviors were limited and eventually stopped as a result of these anti racism movements

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4633202&forum_id=2#40986844)

Also, I just checked and the definition of racism you provided ITT is not in the dictionary. Your definition was: “not wanting to live around blacks because a black person killed your children.”

You need to understand that true definitions are formed from reality, not your whims or the preferences of the editor of a particular dictionary.

As I explained, my definition comes from reality. It describes behaviors that formerly were common when the “racist” term and anti racist movements first began. As a result of these movements, the racist behavior limited and eventually stopped. Again, all based in reality. Your definition is fanciful

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4633202&forum_id=2#40986884)

this is quite simple. trying to further delineate the types of beliefs, putting muh science above actual experience, is nonsensical. it only works to let you feel better than the low-status "racists" who are primitive and dont read blogs

and no, words do not only mean what you want them to mean. that is what Leftists think. here you define racism as "race-based things ppl used to do but mostly dont do anymore" that is obviously completely self-serving in this context and has no basis in anything but blogs

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4633202&forum_id=2#40986919)

I agree with you that, as defined in your most recent poast, “racism” is natural and good

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4633202&forum_id=2#40987043)

You are missing my entire point, which is that the “archaic” definition of racism is true and correct, and its definition cannot and will never change; despite whatever the dictionary definition written in [insert current year] says.

Part of this point is that a definition must be BASED in reality. You confuse this with “used” in reality, which is a meaningless statement

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4633202&forum_id=2#40987136)

Libs get around it by tying 'racism' to perceived political power. So blacks cannot be 'neo-racist' because they do not wield political power. Even in majority black locales where blacks dominate local and/or state level politics they cannot be racist under this paradigm because ... fuck whitey.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4633202&forum_id=2#40986944)