https://youtu.be/d4vHegf3WPU

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4846255&forum_id=2#42548111)

Why would they want children to join this fun?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4846255&forum_id=2#42548177)

In empirical fact, adults role play homosexual sexual intercourse, and participate in sexual interactions in public at gay pride parades.

There's no "extra step" to understanding this cartoon as inviting children to sexual interactions with adults.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4846255&forum_id=2#42548227)

Maybe a slightly less cynical take is that this is forced programming from a very young age to impose a particular set of morals on an entire generation..

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4846255&forum_id=2#42548257)

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4846255&forum_id=2#42548275)

The cartoon shows animals who are in a parade and look happy. That's the "fun" to the viewer. Hence, my comment that your interpretation requires tricking children into attending a public adult gay sex orgy.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4846255&forum_id=2#42548296)

your argument is like saying mcdonalds commercials for happy meals dont show the arterial plaque that red meat causes, so its not immoral to try to entice kids to eat happy meals

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4846255&forum_id=2#42548312)

Wait -- totally random and crazy shot in the dark, but are you Jewish, by any chance?

(Reminder: Like all Jews, Bloodacre literally considers this mere question / observation to be a deeply offensive and highly problematic "personal attack" on him, but strangely he won't explain why he feels that way even though it's literally just a statement of provable fact. See: http://autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4844490&mc=26&forum_id=2#42537928 )

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4846255&forum_id=2#42556125)

Is there a reason that simply asking that question / pointing out that you are Jewish is a "personal attack" (your term not mine)?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4846255&forum_id=2#42557008)

I interpreted this, maybe based on your long history of posting negative things about jews and libs, to mean that those personal identifiers meant that we were not cool. It felt like an attack. If this was a misinterpretation of your post, then I apologize. In retrospect, I think it is probably just as reasonable to assume that you view my being a liberal jew as something positive. Only you know what you intended with the post.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4846255&forum_id=2#42557125)

just like i think that children's entertainment should ignore the existence of: furries, BDSM, feeder fetish, cuck fetish, bestiality, etc etc

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4846255&forum_id=2#42557005)

i still remember when libs argued for legalizing homosexuality by saying "what two adults do behind closed doors is none of the govt's business!" and when it was pointed out that next they'd want to have gay marriage/adoption, and after that shove gay shit down people's throats nonstop 24/7, it was all "well that's just an absurd slippery slope fallacy!"

regardless, the distinctions you're trying to draw are retarded and completely ad hoc. plenty of people, especially in lib cities, are starting to put their sexual fetishes on full display: dommes taking sub dudes on leashes to their college reunions, weird shit at pride parades, going on picnics with their polycule, wearing furry gear to college classes, etc. further extension of these mental illnesses into the public sphere doesn't justify including them in kids' propaganda.

your labeling of two men raising a child together as "dads" as "normal" is completely arbitrary, and contrary to what 99% of the world beleived as of 20 years ago. you're saying "we should show this because it's normal," but no, it's not normal at all in the grand scheme of human civilization. it's incredibly fucked up and weird. but libs have been on a concerted decades-long propaganda mission to *make* it normal. if they can make that normal, they can make furry, poly, cuck etc normal too.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4846255&forum_id=2#42557168)

As I said in my other posts, I think the blues clues video made for kids aged 2-5 is obscene propaganda. If the slippery slope is actually leading us to a point where children are taught about bestiality, I would agree the brakes should be pumped.

EDIT: based on your edit. I'm not saying we need to show gay guys on TV for the purpose of normalizing their lifestyle. All I am saying is that I don't think it is harmful to children portray gay people in media. I don't think being gay is a choice, so in that sense, even if most societies in history have frowned upon them, I don't and believe their existence is a normal, natural thing.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4846255&forum_id=2#42557216)

Just hold off on shoving this garbage in the faces of the kids of people who don't agree with it. Get it out of preschools, get it out of kids' shows, etc.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4846255&forum_id=2#42557513)

the Antifa / BLM fist on the mic seemed like just too much

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4846255&forum_id=2#42548271)

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4846255&forum_id=2#42549290)

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Asexuality

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4846255&forum_id=2#42550901)