Bill Clinton era libs made us abandon the neutron bomb. No reason!
| Talking Buck-toothed Weed Whacker | 10/04/22 | | Talking Buck-toothed Weed Whacker | 10/04/22 | | Talking Buck-toothed Weed Whacker | 10/04/22 | | Talking Buck-toothed Weed Whacker | 05/14/23 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: October 4th, 2022 1:08 AM Author: Talking Buck-toothed Weed Whacker
In May 1998, Senior Pakistani Scientist, Dr. N. M. Butt, stated that "PAEC built a sufficient number of neutron bombs—a battlefield weapon that is essentially a low yield device".[28]
In August 1999, the Indian government stated that India was capable of producing a neutron bomb.[29]
Although no country is currently known to deploy them in an offensive manner, all thermonuclear dial-a-yield warheads that have about 10 kiloton and lower as one dial option, with a considerable fraction of that yield derived from fusion reactions, can be considered able to be neutron bombs in use, if not in name. The only country definitely known to deploy dedicated (that is, not dial-a-yield) neutron warheads for any length of time is the Soviet Union/Russia,[6] which inherited the USSR's neutron warhead equipped ABM-3 Gazelle missile program. This ABM system contains at least 68 neutron warheads with a 10 kiloton yield each and it has been in service since 1995, with inert missile testing approximately every other year since then (2014). The system is designed to destroy incoming endoatmospheric nuclear warheads aimed at Moscow and other targets and is the lower-tier/last umbrella of the A-135 anti-ballistic missile system (NATO reporting name: ABM-3).[7]
By 1984, according to Mordechai Vanunu, Israel was mass-producing neutron bombs.[30]
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5205173&forum_id=2#45275741) |
|
|