And then you’ll have the impoverished redditors bitching that it’s $60. I don’t even want to see that shit again, they’re pathetic jfc. And they’ll say that the State of Gaming has been marred by Nintendo’s disreputable practices

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5542525&forum_id=2#47759895)

"The game starts with Zelda literally breaking out of the damsel in distress trope, which I think was an explicit acknowledgement on Nintendo's part, so I think it's a bit premature to say exactly what the scope of her abilities will be. That said, if this road leads to "it's sexist for Zelda to not use a sword" I'm just not super compelled to debate about that. If I'm being honest, I think what most people are really saying is that they just wish they could use a sword because they think it's more fun but feel compelled to tie it into some broader moralistic argument that I think stands on pretty shaky foundation. Like, your logic here stipulates that any divergence between Zelda and Link stems from sexist tropes and is thus the residual effect of harmful gender norms, so the proper response, then, is to make Zelda identical to Link because absolute parity would also represent an absolute lack of sexism. Which is fine if you're only concerned with making a moral stand and not also needing to balance that with making an innovative and fun game."

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5542525&forum_id=2#47759976)

Yeah it is 2D and looks kinda indie, but it looks like you can be really creative like in TOTK. I bet its a ton of fun. I showed my 8yo niece and she instantly wanted it.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5542525&forum_id=2#47760610)