also he'd prob still be a no name state senator if Seven of Nine wasn't such a whore and her husband wasn't such a sociopath

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5589810&forum_id=2#48056338)

But Seven of Nine's husband was an alpha, not a sociopath.

And Obama was raised as a Muslim, and went to Muslim school, in Indonesia. So he is an atheist with Muslim tendencies.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5589810&forum_id=2#48059485)

as someone with daughters I find this to be just a wonderful message to send to America's youth

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5589810&forum_id=2#48056374)

His grandpa was a muslim and he has a muslim middle name. Would anyone be surprised if someday we learned "Obama is rediscovering his Islam roots!"

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5589810&forum_id=2#48056820)

he's a hollow shell of a man who does not actually believe in anything he espouses. he even let us in on this secret with his books--at some point he realized that if people would mirror their own views onto him, he could be anything they wanted him to be, and gain power and wealth (his main motivation in life) as a result.

that said, there are some incontrovertible truths about him that have since been discovered. namely, he is 100% a guaranteed homosexual, his wife is a transexual, and his kids do not belong to the two of them together. they look nothing alike!

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5589810&forum_id=2#48056843)

you: moving commas for Cohen from 8 am to 9 pm

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5589810&forum_id=2#48056904)

The humor behind much of this lies in its absurdity and trolling nature. Poasters on AutoAdmit frequently post extreme or wildly inaccurate claims not to convince others, but to generate reactions, stir debate, or entertain in a very dark, sarcastic way.

The quotemo’s follow-up, “sooo, no longer a secret Muslim?” takes on a trolling tone, likely poking at the fact that the discussion has devolved into various unrelated accusations (atheism, homosexuality), diverting from the original question. The “sooo” phrasing, seen as childlike or condescending, triggers another typical AutoAdmit response in the form of personal insults by the same user, further escalating the trolling dynamics. The back-and-forth here is indicative of AutoAdmit poasters’ tendency to mix mockery with attempted serious points, all within a cloud of misanthropic humor.

Later, the post by “Reverend Right” takes a cynical but more grounded approach, portraying Obama as someone who exploited religion for political gain without personally subscribing to it—though this point is couched in a broader narrative that still includes farcical, provocative elements (e.g., the unfounded claims about his sexuality and family).

The final thrust of the conversation—where the relevance of Obama attending Reverend Wright’s church is dismissed as irrelevant or calculated for political gain—reflects the way AutoAdmit poasters tend to engage in broad speculation, sometimes blending real political criticism with trolling or conspiracy to undermine the subject at hand.

In essence, this entire thread plays on AutoAdmit’s unique mix of inflammatory humor and trolling, with poasters using extreme positions or conspiracy theories not for serious debate but to poke fun, inflame others, or escalate the conversation into absurd territory. The quotemo’s role here as the original poaster and subsequent participant demonstrates how quickly discussions can veer from a simple, controversial premise into chaotic, hyperbolic territory.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5589810&forum_id=2#48056905)

hth

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5589810&forum_id=2#48057192)