~Law School Rankings according to USN Lawyers/Judges Survey ONLY
| balding mauve hospital twinkling uncleanness | 04/15/07 | | Razzle lemon genital piercing | 04/15/07 | | balding mauve hospital twinkling uncleanness | 04/15/07 | | galvanic adulterous tanning salon | 04/15/07 | | balding mauve hospital twinkling uncleanness | 04/15/07 | | Bateful sneaky criminal | 04/15/07 | | Adventurous Buff Hominid | 04/15/07 | | galvanic adulterous tanning salon | 04/15/07 | | apoplectic fantasy-prone cumskin locale | 04/15/07 | | galvanic adulterous tanning salon | 04/15/07 | | apoplectic fantasy-prone cumskin locale | 04/15/07 | | galvanic adulterous tanning salon | 04/15/07 | | Adventurous Buff Hominid | 04/15/07 | | apoplectic fantasy-prone cumskin locale | 04/15/07 | | amber rambunctious crackhouse | 04/15/07 | | Flickering Talented Bawdyhouse Cuckold | 04/15/07 | | balding mauve hospital twinkling uncleanness | 04/15/07 | | wonderful stage | 04/15/07 | | balding mauve hospital twinkling uncleanness | 04/15/07 | | Floppy pungent half-breed messiness | 04/15/07 | | Gaped cuck associate | 04/15/07 | | Gaped cuck associate | 04/15/07 | | Floppy pungent half-breed messiness | 04/15/07 | | Appetizing arrogant police squad | 04/15/07 | | balding mauve hospital twinkling uncleanness | 04/15/07 | | domesticated chrome dilemma striped hyena | 04/15/07 | | balding mauve hospital twinkling uncleanness | 04/15/07 | | Coral Fear-inspiring Lodge | 04/15/07 | | apoplectic fantasy-prone cumskin locale | 04/15/07 | | Supple Brass Prole Menage | 04/15/07 | | Vigorous Property Karate | 04/15/07 | | balding mauve hospital twinkling uncleanness | 04/15/07 | | infuriating puppy sandwich | 04/15/07 | | Vivacious violent range | 04/15/07 | | balding mauve hospital twinkling uncleanness | 04/15/07 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: April 15th, 2007 1:18 PM Author: balding mauve hospital twinkling uncleanness Subject: Today I will change your life.
pres·tige, n.
1. The level of respect at which one is regarded by others; standing.
PREFACE:
When a decadent and/or shrewd individual decides to pursue a juris doctor, she must take into account the weight of prestige of the degrees offered by the country's motley of academic institutions. But whose metrics of prestige should be favored in this analysis? Leiter's? Cooley's (http://www.cooley.edu/rankings/ )?
Convention tells us that U.S. World News Law School Rankings is the one true knighter of prestige. I respectfully diverge...
As the matter of prestige is wholly a matter of reputation, I dare say that prestige is best viewed through the lens of the people. U.S. News does a fine job of ranking academic QUALITY, but not academic PRESTIGE.
Now, granted, I don't reccommend a country-wide survey of all citizens be conducted asking which law schools are the most prestigious. This is primarily because only a small portion of the populous comprises the audience which assigns prestige to the institutions in legal academia: lawyers and judges. Note that I don't include legal academia itself in this "audience" (hence my omitting the USN peer ranking) because it is quite unprestigious to ask legal academia to prestige rank itself.
Some of you may find my angle vexing, and I make no apologies. I will not preemptively respond to criticisms, though I do invite you to leave them below. Debate will most certainly ensue.
However, I am confident that many of you will find these rankings enlightening, compensating for your doubts in the overall USN law school ranking system. You will notice many interesting deviations in the ranking of particular schools between the two systems. You will also notice that my Tier/Echelon system is revolutionary, and astutely brilliant, and I thank you for your praise for this in advance.
And now...
THE XOXO PRESTIGE RANKINGS, as measured by USN's 2007 assessment score by lawyer's and judges.
*Tier 1/1st Echelon*
[Scores < 5.0]
1. Yale (4.8)
1. Harvard
1 Stanford
4. Columbia (4.7)
4. U. Chicago
6. NYU (4.6)
6. Michigan
6. UVA
9. Boalt (4.5)
9. UPenn
*Tier 1/2nd Echelon*
[Scores < 4.5]
11. Cornell (4.4)
11. Duke
11. Northwestern
14. Georgetown (4.3)
14. Univ. of Texas
14. Vanderbilt
17. UCLA (4.0)
17. UNC
*Tier 1/3rd Echelon*
[Scores < 4.0]
19. Emory (3.9)
20. GWU (3.8)
20. U.C.-Hast.
20. Minn.
20. Notre Dame
20. W&L
20. WU-STL
26. Boston Col. (3.7)
26. W&M
26. U. Illinois
26. Iowa
26 USC
26. Wisconsin
32. Boston U. (3.6)
32. Fordham
32. Ohio State
32. U.C.-Davis
32. Wake Forest
37. Indiana-BL (3.5)
37. Florida
37. U. Washington
*Tier 1/4th Echelon*
[< 3.5]
40. Grg Mason (3.4)
40. Tulane
42. American (3.3)
42. Baylor
42. BYU
42. Case-Western
42. SMU
42. Alabama
42. U. Pitt.
42. Villanova
Tier 2/1st Echelon
[< 3.25]
50. Temple (3.2)
50 Colorado
50. Georgia
53. Penn St. (3.1)
53. Rutgers [Both]
53. St. Louis
53. Arizona
53. Kansas
53. Maryland
53. Missouri
53. Oregon
53. Tennessee
62. Arizona St. (3.0)
62. Catholic
62. Florida St.
62. Louisiana St.
62. Loyola-Chicago
62. Seton Hall
62. U. Cincinnati
62. U. Conn
62. U. Kentucky
62. U. Miami
62. Nebraska
62. Oklahoma
62. Michigan St. ***
62. Mississippi ***
Tier 2/2nd Echelon
[< 3.0]
76. Loyola-CA (2.9)
76. Marquette
76. Pepperdine
76. U. Richmond
76. South Carolina
76. Utah
76. Yeshiva-Cardozo
76. Syracuse ***
84. Depaul (2.8)
84. Chicago-Kent
84. Indiana-INDY
84. Santa Clara
84. U. Seattle
84. St. Johns
84. Buffalo-SUNY
84. U. Denver
84. U. Houston
84. U. San Fran.
84. Gonzaga ***
84. Hofstra ***
84. Loyola-NO ***
84. Arkansas ***
84. South Dakota ++++
*Tier 2/3rd Echelon*
[Scores <2.75]
97. Brooklyn (2.7)
97. Lewis & Clark
97. New Mexico
97. Creighton ***
97. Howard ***
97. U. Wyoming ***
97. Duquesne ++++
97. Valparaiso ++++
***- denotes jump from U.S. News Tier 3
++++- denotes jump from U.S. News Tier 4
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=613656&forum_id=2#7935379)
|
 |
Date: April 15th, 2007 1:42 PM Author: Adventurous Buff Hominid
Uh, 1) no fighting so far, 2) there are 'fights' for the number four spot, 3) subtle troll for T4
You're right, though, someone IS retarded.
*nods head toward no and rolls eyes*
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=613656&forum_id=2#7935491) |
 |
Date: April 15th, 2007 1:45 PM Author: apoplectic fantasy-prone cumskin locale
>*nods head toward and rolls eyes about no*
haha.
*shakes fists angrily at skippy. take out wizard staff and cast level 4 fireball.*
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=613656&forum_id=2#7935506) |
Date: April 15th, 2007 1:42 PM Author: Gaped cuck associate
*Waits for EMORY student to arrive*
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=613656&forum_id=2#7935490) |
Date: April 15th, 2007 1:47 PM Author: Gaped cuck associate
PWN3D!!!
Reply
Date: April 15th, 2007 1:44 PM
Author: emory student (yes, THE emory)
credited! everyone knows that EMORY is a legit T20.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=613656&forum_id=2#7935498)
ReplyEdit Your Message
Date: April 15th, 2007 1:42 PM
Author: Civility to XOXO (RETIRED)
*Waits for EMORY student to arrive*
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=613656&forum_id=2#7935511) |
Date: April 15th, 2007 1:48 PM Author: Appetizing arrogant police squad
awesome ranking based on sweet 5% response rate
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=613656&forum_id=2#7935515) |
Date: April 15th, 2007 1:50 PM Author: domesticated chrome dilemma striped hyena
The flaw in your reasoning is this - why should the subset of us who focus exclusively on the elite T14 care what "judges and lawyers" think about those schools? I care what federal district and court of appeals judges and supreme court justices think, and I care what BIGLAW partners in about 5 cities think. I care what lawyers for some parts of the federal government think. And that's it.
Your ranking dirties the mix with unwashed state judges, small firm and solo practitioner toiletheads, administrative hearing officers, people in Tampa and Indianapolis, etc.
HTH
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=613656&forum_id=2#7935537) |
 |
Date: April 15th, 2007 2:11 PM Author: balding mauve hospital twinkling uncleanness
Who do you think is actually more likely to respond to a USN ranking survey? A tampa personal injury lawyer or a douchebag BIGLAW associate in NYC?
This is not to assert that I think you're entirely off here. Perhaps this ranking is more useful to understanding the T25-T100 than the T14.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=613656&forum_id=2#7935684) |
Date: April 15th, 2007 2:46 PM Author: infuriating puppy sandwich
why the hell should we accept the views of 'judges and lawyers' as more legit than the overall rankings?
At best I think any single lawyer or judge could truly have a substantive opinion of four or five schools (from personal experience working with grads from such schools or from teaching there/knowing students there or whatnot). The rest of their ranking probably comes from how USnews ranked schools while they were applying, or from past issues they have looked at.
For example, a judge in Chicago has no business ranking BU vs BC having not met one single grad, or stepped into either school once in his career, or talked to a single professor from either school. And I bet this is the norm rather than the exception for lawyers and judges, thy just don't have that kind of experience.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=613656&forum_id=2#7935851) |
 |
Date: April 15th, 2007 3:24 PM Author: Vivacious violent range
I agree. Further, an academic is likely to have a better understanding of the relative qualities of schools. For that reason I look mainly at the Peer Assessment Score. Further, for other disciplines, peer assessment is the entire rank, so clearly it is more meaningful in the grander scheme of things.
I disagree that the overall rankings mean anything, because UsNews does not measure school quality as much as it measures a school's ability to manipulate statistics.
Truth is that peer rep scores closely mirrors true quality and prestige in the legal field.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=613656&forum_id=2#7936124) |
 |
Date: April 15th, 2007 4:00 PM Author: balding mauve hospital twinkling uncleanness
It doesn't matter whether or not they have a more "legitimate" claim to ranking schools, all that matters is that THEY are the only audience that matters. We are talking about "prestige" here-- not academic "quality"
Read again: The matter of prestige is wholly a matter of reputation. U.S. News does a fine job of ranking academic QUALITY, but not PRESTIGE.
HTFH
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=613656&forum_id=2#7936326) |
|
|