\
  The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
BackRefresh Options Favorite

Birdshit Europe's Decline one of FASTEST in Human History

180, there's literally no reason these places shld be much r...
AZNgirl Crying over Det Handsome Stabbed by Sikh
  06/03/26
this factual claim is astonishing: in 17 years the EU's shar...
,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
  06/03/26
Interesting you say it's the most rapid decline in history w...
Bow tie niggas always have very strong opinions
  06/03/26
Interesting only happened after allowing in a bunch of brown...
.,.,.:,,.,:.,:,,:,.::,:.:.,.,:.,:,,.:.,.,:.::,
  06/03/26
...
Bow tie niggas always have very strong opinions
  06/03/26
This doesn’t seem like that relevant of a comparison, ...
SniggIe
  06/03/26
It’s worth noting that a huge chunk of global GDP grow...
SniggIe
  06/03/26


Poast new message in this thread



Reply Favorite

Date: June 3rd, 2026 9:23 AM
Author: AZNgirl Crying over Det Handsome Stabbed by Sikh

180, there's literally no reason these places shld be much richer than Latin America. Basically same lazy culture with backwards buracratic socialist govts

Arnaud Bertrand

@RnaudBertrand

·

4h

People don't grasp the sheer speed and scale of Europe's decline.

This 👇 is an extraordinary number shared by Luis Vassy, director of Sciences Po (one of France's most famous schools) in this article: https://legrandcontinent.eu/fr/2026/06/03/doctrine-vassy/

He calculated that the EU is declining 3 times faster than the Qing dynasty at the height of China's century of humiliation.

Back then, it took China 50 years to drop from 30% of world GDP to 17%, whereas it took the EU just 17 years (from 2008 to 2025).

Insane 😢 And, sadly, given the current direction and the EU's systematically suicidal policy choices (latest example: https://x.com/RnaudBertrand/status/2061648819369250987?s=20), it's just the beginning...

https://x.com/RnaudBertrand/status/2062096610239082912

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5870786&forum_id=2.#49912564)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 3rd, 2026 9:39 AM
Author: ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,


this factual claim is astonishing: in 17 years the EU's share of the world economy fell from 30% to 17%.



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5870786&forum_id=2.#49912589)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 3rd, 2026 9:43 AM
Author: Bow tie niggas always have very strong opinions

Interesting you say it's the most rapid decline in history while also referencing Latin America.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5870786&forum_id=2.#49912591)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 3rd, 2026 9:45 AM
Author: .,.,.:,,.,:.,:,,:,.::,:.:.,.,:.,:,,.:.,.,:.::,


Interesting only happened after allowing in a bunch of browns

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5870786&forum_id=2.#49912595)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 3rd, 2026 9:47 AM
Author: Bow tie niggas always have very strong opinions



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5870786&forum_id=2.#49912599)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 3rd, 2026 9:58 AM
Author: SniggIe

This doesn’t seem like that relevant of a comparison, tbh. A lot of global economic growth right now are underdeveloped countries catching up, as opposed to previously relatively equal peers starting to bifurcate. It’s also a share of world gdp, so growth in one place means a decline somewhere else, even if the economy as a whole is growing quickly.

GDP is a recent measure; it’s not like the Quing dynasty or other countries at the time were deliberately trying to grow GDP. European countries today don’t weigh GDP growth that high as a policy priority, but it’s literally the #1 policy priority of China, which sets annual GDP growth targets.



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5870786&forum_id=2.#49912617)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 3rd, 2026 10:02 AM
Author: SniggIe

It’s worth noting that a huge chunk of global GDP growth is just China, which in turn is achieving its growth through massive subsidies to its own manufacturing businesses. This is low efficiency growth because it doesn’t reward innovative or efficient manufacturers.

https://www.wsj.com/economy/global/oecd-finds-60-of-chinese-gains-in-market-share-driven-by-subsidies-5160b8da

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5870786&forum_id=2.#49912625)