Wait, this is the holding of Wong Kim Ark??
| hateful rehab macaca | 12/08/25 | | tan nudist jewess indian lodge | 12/08/25 | | heady school cafeteria personal credit line | 12/08/25 | | hateful rehab macaca | 12/08/25 | | Rose Free-loading Gas Station | 12/08/25 | | hateful rehab macaca | 12/08/25 | | Rose Free-loading Gas Station | 12/08/25 | | navy nursing home fat ankles | 12/09/25 | | fluffy stirring codepig organic girlfriend | 12/09/25 | | Glassy gaped pervert | 12/09/25 | | Biglaw partner throwin' ya some overtime | 06/18/26 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: December 8th, 2025 11:37 PM Author: hateful rehab macaca
United States v. Wong Kim Ark, 169 U.S. 649 (1898), is a landmark decision[2] of the U.S. Supreme Court which held that "a child born in the United States, of parents of Chinese descent, who, at the time of his birth, are subjects of the Emperor of China, but have a permanent domicile and residence in the United States, and are there carrying on business, and are not employed in any diplomatic or official capacity under the Emperor of China", automatically became a U.S. citizen at birth.[3]
Seems like a salient factor that WKA's parents "have a permanent domicile and residence in the united states and are there carrying on business"?
How does this turn into "who, at the time of his birth, entered the country illegally and committed a crime in entering"?
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5808198&forum_id=2.#49495681) |
|
|