SCOTUS Stays Hawaii Judge's Order Trying To Stop Trump Trannie Passport Ban
| vivacious pervert temple | 11/06/25 | | vivacious pervert temple | 11/06/25 | | Big-titted bat shit crazy state background story | 11/06/25 | | vivacious pervert temple | 11/06/25 | | Big-titted bat shit crazy state background story | 11/06/25 | | Magical Jew | 11/06/25 | | Violet wonderful senate | 11/07/25 | | startled odious institution sneaky criminal | 11/06/25 | | vivacious pervert temple | 11/06/25 | | startled odious institution sneaky criminal | 11/06/25 | | Diverse address | 11/06/25 | | Magical Jew | 11/06/25 | | startled odious institution sneaky criminal | 11/06/25 | | Diverse address | 11/06/25 | | Diverse address | 11/06/25 | | vivacious pervert temple | 11/06/25 | | Big-titted bat shit crazy state background story | 11/06/25 | | cheese-eating internal respiration | 11/06/25 | | sickened well-lubricated turdskin | 11/06/25 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: November 6th, 2025 4:04 PM Author: vivacious pervert temple
JUSTICE JACKSON, with whom JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR and
JUSTICE KAGAN join, dissenting from the grant of application for stay.
As is becoming routine, the Government seeks an emergency stay of a District Court’s preliminary injunction
pending appeal. As is also becoming routine, this Court
misunderstands the assignment
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5794337&forum_id=2.#49407938) |
 |
Date: November 6th, 2025 4:18 PM Author: vivacious pervert temple
dissent p. 9:
But how urgent can
this interest be when the Passport Policy itself allows
transgender Americans who already have passports with
sex markers reflecting their current gender identity to continue using those passports until they expire?
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5794337&forum_id=2.#49407977) |
Date: November 6th, 2025 4:18 PM Author: Diverse address
As is becoming routine, the Government seeks an emergency stay of a District Court’s preliminary injunction
pending appeal. As is also becoming routine, this Court
misunderstands the assignment.
Our task in deciding stay applications is not simply to
make a “back-of-the-napkin assessment of which party has
the better legal argument.” Noem v. Doe, 605 U. S. ___, ___
(2025) (JACKSON, J., dissenting from grant of stay) (slip op.,
at 3).
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5794337&forum_id=2.#49407976) |
|
|