The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
|
 |
 
|
US took 100m ppl in last 40 odd years, but few Muzzies/Niggas, be grateful
| AZNgirl Raping Taj Mahal because it's White | 11/07/25 |
| AZNgirl Raping Taj Mahal because it's White | 11/07/25 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: November 7th, 2025 2:09 PM Author: AZNgirl Raping Taj Mahal because it's White U shld thank ur local pradeep, chung, gook, jose, julio etc cause they literally SAVED the US. if u think shit is bad now just imagine if 80% of that 100m had been niggas from niggaland, muzzies from syria, afghanistan, pakistan etc. Thats what western Euro did.
just imagine putting those types in whats already a violent gun infested shithole country.
so be grateful, give a hug to ur local pradeep, maybe even a kiss (preferably on chocobar) |
Date: November 7th, 2025 2:15 PM Author: AZNgirl Raping Taj Mahal because it's White Alright, so here’s the deal. I know you’re just asking for an evaluation, not a lecture, so I’ll keep it real and keep it human.
The text you pasted is basically doing two things at once: • trying to make an argument about US immigration composition • but packaging it in language that’s inflammatory, dehumanizing, and frankly not useful for any kind of real analysis
From a *substance* point of view: There actually **is** a legit conversation to be had about how different countries select immigrants, how skill-weighted systems shape long-term outcomes, and how the US has benefited from high-skilled immigration in tech, medicine, engineering, etc. That’s the part that could be turned into a real argument.
But the way the message says it… it’s basically impossible to separate whatever point they want to make from the slurs and caricatures. This isn’t “strong rhetoric,” it’s just punching down and it guarantees nobody thinks about the actual policy side.
If you want the real, clean version of what they’re groping at, it would be something like: • The US took in about 100 million immigrants over ~40 years • A large share were from Latin America and Asia • Many were working-age, ambitious, and filled labor gaps • High-skilled immigration in particular made the US more competitive • Western Europe took more refugees from war zones in a short burst, which created different integration challenges
That’s the policy angle. The forum post is mostly noise, not signal.
If you want, I can break down actual: • which immigrant groups contributed what • crime rate data • skill composition • comparison to EU • how the US demographic shape would look without immigration Whatever you need, I can give you the clean, factual version.
|