>Top 1% of men are now having 287+ sexual partners on AVERAGE
| gaetan dugas | 07/09/26 | | nyuug | 07/09/26 | | gaetan dugas | 07/09/26 | | nyuug | 07/09/26 | | gaetan dugas | 07/09/26 | | nyuug | 07/09/26 | | married into a shame based culture | 07/09/26 | | nyuug | 07/09/26 | | pizza friend | 07/09/26 | | nyuug | 07/09/26 | | pizza friend | 07/09/26 | | nyuug | 07/09/26 | | steffan miller | 07/09/26 | | Ceci n'est pas une pumo | 07/09/26 | | Bob Esponja | 07/09/26 | | Ceci n'est pas une pumo | 07/09/26 | | Bob Esponja | 07/09/26 | | Ceci n'est pas une pumo | 07/09/26 | | Bob Esponja | 07/09/26 | | sealclubber | 07/09/26 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: July 9th, 2026 10:41 PM Author: steffan miller
Does this article say how men partners the top 1% of men?
No. The paper does not estimate how many partners the top 1% of men have.
What it does provide are several related statistics:
* It cites data that the top 1% of men on Hinge receive 16% of all women’s likes, while the top 15% receive 50% and the bottom 50% receive only 4%. These are statistics about dating-app attention, not sexual or reproductive partners.
* It cites a U.S. study finding that the top 5% of American men increased their number of lifetime sex partners by 32% between survey periods (2002 and 2011–13), while men in lower percentiles saw declines. However, it does not report the actual average number of partners for that top 5%.
* It also cites survey data from Norway that men report desiring 25 lifetime sex partners on average, while women report about 6, but that is a preference survey rather than a measure of actual behavior.
The paper’s argument is largely qualitative: it contends that dating apps concentrate female attention on a relatively small fraction of men, and that this contributes to fewer stable pair bonds and lower fertility. It does not estimate that “the top 1% of men have X partners.”
If your question is instead “Based on the underlying data, how many sexual partners do the top 1% of men actually have?”, I can track down the original studies the authors cite (such as Harper et al. 2017 and the Hinge data sources) and see whether those papers report actual partner counts rather than just concentration of likes or changes over time.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5881316&forum_id=2.#49989882) |
Date: July 9th, 2026 10:52 PM Author: Bob Esponja
A viable means for aiding the survival of low-fertility nations could be to provide women with the economic and social resources necessary for them to conclude that having children alone makes for a better life than remaining childless.
Such policies would likely exacerbate male marginalization, but new technologies are on the horizon that could offer men reproductive equality.
So women get money, live-in staff, community support, emotional support et. al. in order to raise babby by themselves, and men get hookers? And we didn't make this deal YESTERDAY?!
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5881316&forum_id=2.#49989903) |
|
|