\
  The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
BackRefresh Options Favorite

xo poll: did Charles I deserve to be executed?

...
Jared Baumeister
  08/04/26
To raise revenue without reconvening Parliament, Charles res...
Jared Baumeister
  08/04/26
Charles also derived money by granting monopolies, despite a...
Jared Baumeister
  08/04/26
absolutely devastating for protestants
richard clock
  08/04/26
Against the background of this unrest, Charles faced bankrup...
Jared Baumeister
  08/04/26


Poast new message in this thread



Reply Favorite

Date: August 4th, 2026 5:46 PM
Author: Jared Baumeister



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5889547&forum_id=2.#50045358)



Reply Favorite

Date: August 4th, 2026 5:48 PM
Author: Jared Baumeister

To raise revenue without reconvening Parliament, Charles resurrected an all-but-forgotten law called the "Distraint of Knighthood", in abeyance for over a century, which required any man who earned £40 or more from land each year to present himself at the king's coronation to be knighted. Relying on this old statute, Charles fined those who had failed to attend his coronation in 1626.[92][e]

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5889547&forum_id=2.#50045367)



Reply Favorite

Date: August 4th, 2026 5:50 PM
Author: Jared Baumeister

Charles also derived money by granting monopolies, despite a statute forbidding such action, which, though inefficient, raised an estimated £100,000 a year in the late 1630s.[98][f] One such monopoly was for soap, pejoratively called "popish soap" because some of its backers were Catholics.[100]

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5889547&forum_id=2.#50045379)



Reply Favorite

Date: August 4th, 2026 5:55 PM
Author: richard clock

absolutely devastating for protestants

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5889547&forum_id=2.#50045389)



Reply Favorite

Date: August 4th, 2026 7:14 PM
Author: Jared Baumeister

Against the background of this unrest, Charles faced bankruptcy in mid-1640. The City of London, preoccupied with its own grievances, refused to make any loans to him, as did foreign powers. In this extremity, in July Charles seized silver bullion worth £130,000 held in trust at the mint in the Tower of London, promising its later return at 8% interest to its owners.[104] In August, after the East India Company refused to grant a loan,[105] Lord Cottington seized the company's stock of pepper and spices and sold it for £60,000 (far below its market value), promising to refund the money with interest later.[106]

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5889547&forum_id=2.#50045576)