Date: December 30th, 2025 3:14 PM Author: comrade beerus
As a heterosexual I don't really care but personally think that gays are best served by the late 70s-mid 80s paradigm of public gayness where there's some slap on the wrist cheeks persecution but it's not all that serious and mostly done in the pursuit of the social side quest of scandalmongering and infamy points (an improper category of existence according to Heidegger)
Homosexuality in the culture being lionized by women (specifically whores looking for a moral sort of meat shield against their own much more corrosive sexual habits) has been terrible for gay QoL and I think most career gays are willing to admit this. Gays dont want to be put under a microscope or "celebrated" by non-gays or whatever weird Amerikkkan devil shit has been going on, they just want to be gay and do gay things and have gay enclaves to themselves, and this is acceptable and fits neatly into the machinery of a more ideal overarching social framework. A culture that has historically defined itself as an alternative to mainstream hetero life fails and falters when brought directly into the spotlight and ceases to be a reserve fountain of refreshment when called upon by more central cultural interests
Date: December 30th, 2025 3:18 PM Author: comrade beerus
Indeed
The WQ has gotten so terrible that Gays and Far right moralists are now allying on the horseshoe against this "Terrible Tenth" of women pretty much destroying and devouring everything of value in the culture by refusing to acknowledge that they themselves are the originator of their lifestyle issues