It's cute when C12 pretends to be a lawyer on social media like he has the creds
| Jared Baumeister | 07/26/26 | | we are definitely claiming fraud trumpmos | 07/26/26 | | valar vettiri morghulis | 07/26/26 | | The Penis | 07/31/26 | | Jared Baumeister | 07/31/26 | | Emotionally + Physically Abusive Ex-Husband | 07/31/26 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: July 31st, 2026 5:38 PM Author: Jared Baumeister
Hey Candace, speaking of your Becoming Brigitte series, there was just a court hearing about that the other day, and it inspired some questions.
1. Back in July of last year, you said that "I'd like to make it to discovery" in the case. So why is it that your attorneys this week were arguing for the case to be immediately dismissed without proceeding to discovery?
2. Why didn't your attorneys argue against the Macrons' case by pointing to the truth of everything you've said about them? Why did you instead argue that the Macrons missed the statute of limitations and that their claim was brought in the wrong jurisdiction? Truth is an absolute defense against defamation claims, so if everything you've said is true, isn't it pretty weird to make all of these procedural arguments instead?
https://x.com/BlakeSNeff/status/2083304754512539757?s=20
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5886501&forum_id=2.#50037533) |
|
|