The reason we have oil is because there was nothing that could eat early plants
| Talking swashbuckling dilemma gunner | 01/06/26 | | Indigo Faggotry | 01/06/26 | | up-to-no-good quadroon lay | 01/06/26 | | Indigo Faggotry | 01/06/26 | | up-to-no-good quadroon lay | 01/06/26 | | Indigo Faggotry | 01/06/26 | | Talking swashbuckling dilemma gunner | 01/06/26 | | Indigo Faggotry | 01/06/26 | | Talking swashbuckling dilemma gunner | 01/06/26 | | Blue stag film | 01/07/26 | | Nudist violet pisswyrm | 01/06/26 | | 180 theatre | 01/06/26 | | up-to-no-good quadroon lay | 01/06/26 | | fantasy-prone locus trump supporter | 01/06/26 | | up-to-no-good quadroon lay | 01/06/26 | | Pale beady-eyed potus | 01/06/26 | | racy feces | 01/06/26 | | Heady Theater Philosopher-king | 01/06/26 |
Poast new message in this thread
 |
Date: January 6th, 2026 11:29 PM Author: Indigo Faggotry
again, i could be dead wrong but i think your claim is wrong. bacteria could decompose plants when plants first arose.
what bacteria could not originally do is decompose lignin created by trees but that was much later in time. that's how we got coal.
the leading theory about oil, on the other hand, was that it was organic material that failed to decompose because it happened to die in low oxygen environments.
am i wrong?
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5818203&forum_id=2.#49568134) |
|
|