The reason we have oil is because there was nothing that could eat early plants
| Twisted wonderful cruise ship | 01/06/26 | | Orange vigorous ape | 01/06/26 | | sinister nubile shitlib | 01/06/26 | | Orange vigorous ape | 01/06/26 | | sinister nubile shitlib | 01/06/26 | | Orange vigorous ape | 01/06/26 | | Twisted wonderful cruise ship | 01/06/26 | | Orange vigorous ape | 01/06/26 | | Twisted wonderful cruise ship | 01/06/26 | | Violent affirmative action bawdyhouse | 01/07/26 | | iridescent appetizing telephone juggernaut | 01/06/26 | | bearded station azn | 01/06/26 | | sinister nubile shitlib | 01/06/26 | | magenta abusive tattoo | 01/06/26 | | sinister nubile shitlib | 01/06/26 | | Out-of-control Excitant Garrison | 01/06/26 | | Vivacious clear casino goal in life | 01/06/26 | | maroon arousing gay wizard | 01/06/26 |
Poast new message in this thread
 |
Date: January 6th, 2026 11:29 PM Author: Orange vigorous ape
again, i could be dead wrong but i think your claim is wrong. bacteria could decompose plants when plants first arose.
what bacteria could not originally do is decompose lignin created by trees but that was much later in time. that's how we got coal.
the leading theory about oil, on the other hand, was that it was organic material that failed to decompose because it happened to die in low oxygen environments.
am i wrong?
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5818203&forum_id=2.#49568134) |
|
|