Date: April 28th, 2025 8:42 AM
Author: 718-662-5970
Plan is, Im retiring.
But on my slow path to the door of this place, I will post some cool random shit
At 16, Michelangelo, son of a fading family - rich in name, poor in money - had already failed out of classics school, had middling success as a painter's apprentice, and finally made his way to be a sculptor's apprentice, where he was noticed and invited to live in the Medici palace.
This was his second big try at working marble:
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/3/39/Michelangelo%2C_centauromachia%2C_1492_ca._01.JPG
He choose the greek story of the Lapiths and Centaurs. The human lapiths had been warring with the horsemen for a long time, till the lapith king decided he wanted peace and invited the brutes to his wedding. They got very drunk and tried to rape the bride (thats her with her ass sticking out), which ignited this battle.
Probably a loose analogue for Greeks v Persians and really civilization v barbarity.
Controversial choice because it was pre-Christian, not explicitly religious, it was nude. Michelangelo further took big risks because his figures were multi-planed, chaotic, with limbs inelegant and askew, violating all the rules of the form.
Wilder, he left it very unfinished and rough. "Stoney".
Thematically, he sort of demythologized or remythologized the story, because there are no real horsemen visible. Everyone looks human. The guy on bottom may be half-horse, or may just be being crushed by a dying horse.
Also, the weapons in everyone's hands are stones and rocks, even as they emerge from stone and are carved from stone, and the piece itself emphasizes its stoniness with its rough chisel marks and unfinished edges. Man emerging from stone to use stone to brutalize man. Civilization rising in relief from barbaric elements, etc., through violence.
Preftigious for a sixteen year old
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5717448&forum_id=2Elisa#48886776)