The reason we have oil is because there was nothing that could eat early plants
| Infuriating chad | 01/06/26 | | Hairraiser Regret | 01/06/26 | | Charismatic rigor trailer park | 01/06/26 | | Hairraiser Regret | 01/06/26 | | Charismatic rigor trailer park | 01/06/26 | | Hairraiser Regret | 01/06/26 | | Infuriating chad | 01/06/26 | | Hairraiser Regret | 01/06/26 | | Infuriating chad | 01/06/26 | | Titillating Point | 01/07/26 | | misanthropic circlehead | 01/06/26 | | Maroon talented giraffe | 01/06/26 | | Charismatic rigor trailer park | 01/06/26 | | bonkers shrine | 01/06/26 | | Charismatic rigor trailer park | 01/06/26 | | Zippy ultramarine stead | 01/06/26 | | Pearly crackhouse old irish cottage | 01/06/26 | | brass hot forum gay wizard | 01/06/26 |
Poast new message in this thread
 |
Date: January 6th, 2026 11:29 PM Author: Hairraiser Regret
again, i could be dead wrong but i think your claim is wrong. bacteria could decompose plants when plants first arose.
what bacteria could not originally do is decompose lignin created by trees but that was much later in time. that's how we got coal.
the leading theory about oil, on the other hand, was that it was organic material that failed to decompose because it happened to die in low oxygen environments.
am i wrong?
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5818203&forum_id=2Elisa#49568134) |
|
|