\
  The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
BackRefresh Options Favorite

Renée is getting a gold coffin

LJL https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/24pdf/23-1239_onjq...
Iridescent Chapel
  01/10/26
Most notable here, the “totality of the circumstances&...
carmine goal in life hairy legs
  01/10/26
Yes, it makes his decision to walk in front of the vehicle i...
Iridescent Chapel
  01/10/26
not sure i buy that analysis.
carmine goal in life hairy legs
  01/10/26
A United States District Judge for the District of Minnesota...
Iridescent Chapel
  01/10/26
"The driver may be drunk, on drugs, armed, or some comb...
Violet stage alpha
  01/10/26
It’s funny how every pencil neck lawyer on this board ...
Cordovan House-broken Stock Car
  01/10/26
Not according to your link.
dead adulterous puppy doctorate
  01/10/26


Poast new message in this thread



Reply Favorite

Date: January 10th, 2026 1:43 PM
Author: Iridescent Chapel

LJL https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/24pdf/23-1239_onjq.pdf

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5820409&forum_id=2Elisa#49578867)



Reply Favorite

Date: January 10th, 2026 1:57 PM
Author: carmine goal in life hairy legs

Most notable here, the “totality of the circumstances” inquiry has no

time limit. While the situation at the precise time of the shooting will

often matter most, earlier facts and circumstances may bear on how a

reasonable officer would have understood and responded to later ones.

Prior events may show why a reasonable officer would perceive otherwise ambiguous conduct as threatening, or instead as innocuous.

Plumhoff v. Rickard, 572 U. S. 765, well illustrates this point. There,

an officer’s use of deadly force was justified “at the moment” partly

because of what had transpired in the preceding period. Id., at 777.

====

so the general conduct of the MN protestors creating threats to ICE is relevant as is the conduct of the two women in the Honda Pilot. helps the officer, right?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5820409&forum_id=2Elisa#49578883)



Reply Favorite

Date: January 10th, 2026 2:46 PM
Author: Iridescent Chapel

Yes, it makes his decision to walk in front of the vehicle in violation of policy and training (while of course engaging in an arrest without reasonable suspicion) even more extreme and therefore weighs heavily against qualified immunity.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5820409&forum_id=2Elisa#49578975)



Reply Favorite

Date: January 10th, 2026 2:50 PM
Author: carmine goal in life hairy legs

not sure i buy that analysis.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5820409&forum_id=2Elisa#49578985)



Reply Favorite

Date: January 10th, 2026 2:54 PM
Author: Iridescent Chapel

A United States District Judge for the District of Minnesota will disagree. Either that or they will decide that it's irrelevant - unlikely because more open to appeal - or that the protestors did nothing. You can quote me on this.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5820409&forum_id=2Elisa#49578989)



Reply Favorite

Date: January 10th, 2026 2:50 PM
Author: Violet stage alpha

"The driver may be drunk, on drugs, armed, or some combination thereof. Or the driver may have committed (or may be about to commit) a serious crime."

wow

"Drivers," and place-goers generally, are a bunch of scumbags.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5820409&forum_id=2Elisa#49578984)



Reply Favorite

Date: January 10th, 2026 3:00 PM
Author: Cordovan House-broken Stock Car

It’s funny how every pencil neck lawyer on this board thinks it’s still 2010.

Whatever happens here, no one is getting paid a nickel.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5820409&forum_id=2Elisa#49579008)



Reply Favorite

Date: January 10th, 2026 3:03 PM
Author: dead adulterous puppy doctorate

Not according to your link.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5820409&forum_id=2Elisa#49579011)