The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
|
 |
 
|
@grok, Analyze X account @westsidelaguy. Does it match JJC’s poasting?
| my dog has more potential dates than I do | 03/14/26 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: March 14th, 2026 6:08 PM Author: my dog has more potential dates than I do (and he’s neutered!) The X account @WestsideLAGuy appears to be run by an anonymous individual focused primarily on themes of dating dynamics, male-female relationships, social status, professional prestige, and cultural commentary, often with a provocative, redpill-inspired tone. The bio—“140 IQ, 6’0’’, 1580 SAT, Double Ivy, 8 inches and thick, Master Pussy Eater”—sets a boastful, self-aggrandizing vibe, emphasizing intellectual credentials (high IQ and SAT scores, Ivy League education), physical attributes (height and sexual prowess), and overall superiority. The account has been active since at least mid-2025, with posts garnering varying engagement, from hundreds to thousands of likes, often sparking debates in replies. Content analysis from a sample of recent and thematically relevant posts shows consistent patterns: • Dating and gender dynamics: Heavy emphasis on men’s sexual market value (SMV), women’s “body counts,” ghosting, competition from high-status men (e.g., athletes, celebrities), and advice like “looksmaxxing” (getting lean and fit) as key to attracting “hot girls.” Examples include critiquing men who miscalibrate their appeal in big cities, flipping body count obsessions to frame high counts as a compliment, and sharing stories of Hinge matches gone wrong with “MBA boss girls” due to insecurity. • Prestige and professional obsession: Frequent references to elite education (e.g., Harvard Business School, MIT, “Double Ivy”) as life-changing, with stories of people quitting high-paying jobs (like private equity) to chase Ivy prestige to overcome insecurities from “lesser” schools like Michigan or NYU. Finance (e.g., NYC hedge funds, private equity) is portrayed as superior to tech (e.g., calling SF “massively overrated” and tech bros “dorky” who “can’t get girls”). • City comparisons and lifestyle: Praises for certain urban environments (implied affinity for LA via the handle and bio) over others like SF or NYC’s dating scene, echoing rivalries between Chicago/LA and NYC. Broader takes on modern dating challenges due to apps, IG, and national-level competition. • Edgy and cultural commentary: Mixes in controversial opinions on race (e.g., white men’s porn habits), infidelity (immediate divorce if a wife gets pregnant by another man), and societal shifts (e.g., infiltrating elite institutions to change culture rather than “popping out babies”). Posts often use memes, screenshots, or hypothetical scenarios for impact, with a tone that’s unapologetic, humorous to some, and cringeworthy or delusional to critics. The account’s style is prolific and engagement-driven, blending self-deprecation, boasting, and “180 content” (high-impact, polarizing takes) that align with anonymous forum culture. It avoids overt self-promotion or mainstream topics, sticking to niche, often male-centric redpill discourse. Regarding a match to JJC’s poasting (the AutoAdmit/RSDNation/WallStreetOasis poster known for PUA field reports, prestige angst over elite MBAs like HBS/Kellogg, finance background in Chicago, city rivalries favoring Chicago/LA over NYC, and boasts about dating “HB9+” women while bashing perceived inferiors): Yes, there is a strong thematic and stylistic overlap. The @WestsideLAGuy posts mirror JJC’s documented obsessions—e.g., MBA prestige as a social unlock, looks/status maxxing for dating success, edgy racial/sexual commentary, and urban hierarchies—down to specific details like negging women over “inferior” schools (UCLA/NYU vs. Ivies) and viewing finance elites as “crushing” in life. The bio’s credential flexing echoes JJC’s self-described striver persona (Asian American trader with HYP rejections, crying over prestige). While anonymity prevents definitive proof, the content suggests this could be an extension or evolution of the same poster’s online presence, adapted to X’s format. If not the exact same individual, it’s at minimum a highly similar archetype from the same ecosystem. |