\
  The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
BackRefresh Options Favorite

Founding Fathers didn't draft the 2nd Amendment with guntoting niggers in mind

They clearly did not mean for niggers to carry firearms. Wh...
Wonderful Pearly Marketing Idea
  07/08/25
there was that UF or something law student posted about here...
Beady-eyed effete hominid university
  07/08/25
...
Doobsian indecent love of her life
  07/08/25
the founding fathers' cost-benefit analysis for allowing a r...
Wonderful Pearly Marketing Idea
  07/08/25
100% interestingly, Switzerland also has a constitutional r...
Beady-eyed effete hominid university
  07/08/25
Correct. Most early “gun control” laws were spec...
Passionate cocky selfie
  07/08/25
...
Doobsian indecent love of her life
  07/08/25
...
Passionate cocky selfie
  07/09/25
Or individuals of any race. They just didn't want to threate...
Exhilarant nubile scourge upon the earth
  07/09/25
No, even the militia-minded view was an individual right to ...
Slimy abode voyeur
  07/09/25
...
nudist fat ankles national
  07/09/25


Poast new message in this thread



Reply Favorite

Date: July 8th, 2025 10:41 AM
Author: Wonderful Pearly Marketing Idea

They clearly did not mean for niggers to carry firearms. Why is this never mentioned by originalists?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5747530&forum_id=2Elisa#49082201)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 8th, 2025 10:44 AM
Author: Beady-eyed effete hominid university

there was that UF or something law student posted about here a few weeks ago who wrote an article saying exactly this, that the originalist interpretation clearly means the freedom only applies to White people and was never intended for negros

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5747530&forum_id=2Elisa#49082215)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 8th, 2025 10:45 AM
Author: Doobsian indecent love of her life



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5747530&forum_id=2Elisa#49082217)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 8th, 2025 10:53 AM
Author: Wonderful Pearly Marketing Idea

the founding fathers' cost-benefit analysis for allowing a right to bear arms clearly assumed niggers would be in cages and not allowed to get anywhere near guns, ever

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5747530&forum_id=2Elisa#49082242)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 8th, 2025 11:01 AM
Author: Beady-eyed effete hominid university

100%

interestingly, Switzerland also has a constitutional right to bear arms *FOR CITIZENS* (it's a very heavily armed country), but the law also specifically *bans* foreigners of certain enumerated nationalities (a bunch of muslim and black african countries) resident in the country from owning arms

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5747530&forum_id=2Elisa#49082265)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 8th, 2025 11:37 AM
Author: Passionate cocky selfie

Correct. Most early “gun control” laws were specifically created with that purpose.

Hilariously, California had to cite some of these laws to defend its own shitlib gun control laws due to Thomas’ “history and tradition” test created in Bruen: https://www.latimes.com/california/story/2024-02-07/if-we-must-rely-on-history-and-tradition-to-assess-gun-laws-does-racist-history-count . Of course they added an “ith tho rathist” disclaimer.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5747530&forum_id=2Elisa#49082362)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 8th, 2025 11:39 AM
Author: Doobsian indecent love of her life



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5747530&forum_id=2Elisa#49082369)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 9th, 2025 1:40 AM
Author: Passionate cocky selfie



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5747530&forum_id=2Elisa#49085166)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 9th, 2025 1:42 AM
Author: Exhilarant nubile scourge upon the earth

Or individuals of any race. They just didn't want to threaten state militia since there was no national army yet

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5747530&forum_id=2Elisa#49085168)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 9th, 2025 2:22 AM
Author: Slimy abode voyeur

No, even the militia-minded view was an individual right to own weapons suitable for militia use, because they also viewed the militia as checking state authority.

Here's an 1840 case taking this view https://guncite.com/court/state/21tn154.html ("If the citizens have these arms in their hands, they are prepared in the best possible manner to repel any encroachments upon their rights by those in authority.")

BTW, what army did George Washington command?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5747530&forum_id=2Elisa#49085182)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 9th, 2025 6:40 AM
Author: nudist fat ankles national



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5747530&forum_id=2Elisa#49085300)