\
  The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
BackRefresh Options Favorite

Quantum entanglement is nuts

Actions that happen faster than the speed of light? We basic...
gibberish (?)
  06/21/26
https://imgbb.com/gbsqxnHg
a blank bump 4 ya mind
  06/21/26
of course things can move faster
pizza friend
  06/21/26
Not a physics expert obviously, but I feel like a lot of the...
Richard Ames
  06/21/26
what if you could outrun a future reaching to pull you there...
a blank bump 4 ya mind
  06/21/26
same. there must be some sort of connection/relationship th...
Kenneth Play
  06/21/26
agreed
AI has never started a F500 company
  06/21/26
How could it possibly be faster than the speed of light?
gibberish (?)
  06/21/26
I don't really think this is right, I think it's more likely...
AI has never started a F500 company
  06/21/26
lol dude I have not thought of that in ages. That guy got so...
Richard Ames
  06/21/26
lol so was it wrong or ???
AI has never started a F500 company
  06/21/26
“String theorists” basically said that the math ...
Richard Ames
  06/21/26
it seems like a lot of the time, different subfields or theo...
AI has never started a F500 company
  06/21/26
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fourth,_fifth,_and_sixth_deriv...
a blank bump 4 ya mind
  06/21/26
I watched some guy on YT a while back who was talking about ...
Richard Ames
  06/21/26
this is similar to how Tom Campbell described remote viewing...
AI has never started a F500 company
  06/21/26
if you had perfect information about the laws of nature, and...
Kenneth Play
  06/21/26
I think it’s more fundamental. But I will have to dig ...
Richard Ames
  06/21/26
...
Kenneth Play
  06/21/26
How does the electron immediately switch polarity thousands ...
gibberish (?)
  06/21/26
It defies our human intuition and how we view the world. We ...
Bow tie niggas always have very strong opinions
  06/21/26
https://imgbb.com/ds7CbRJg
a blank bump 4 ya mind
  06/21/26
lol tyft
Richard Ames
  06/21/26
arrogant to assume we know 1%
a blank bump 4 ya mind
  06/21/26
Fair
gibberish (?)
  06/21/26
it just looks like magic because we're stupid
icanseemyneurons
  06/21/26
https://imgbb.com/q4HJkCy
a blank bump 4 ya mind
  06/21/26
also to add, we know basically zero about the universe. the...
Kenneth Play
  06/21/26
this assumes what we see through our eyes constitutes the ph...
a blank bump 4 ya mind
  06/21/26
Is that true about planets? How could we know this?
TurboGrafx-67
  06/21/26
Because the jewscope zoomed in on a section of space with 10...
state your IQ before I engage you further
  06/21/26
It’s all fucking Bryce 3D. I watched some video that w...
Richard Ames
  06/21/26
Yeah but that's just how instruments/sensors work in the sci...
The Penis
  06/21/26
oh i don't pretend to be an expert here, i rely on what the ...
Kenneth Play
  06/21/26
https://imgbb.com/Wpxf16dS
a blank bump 4 ya mind
  06/21/26
This is merely a failure/inadequacy of the quantum mechanica...
cucumbers
  06/21/26
https://imgbb.com/TB55V039
a blank bump 4 ya mind
  06/21/26
Cr
cucumbers
  06/21/26
Pants are tightening!!!!!
Richard Ames
  06/21/26
1. That is not what quantum entanglement is 2. Why do you t...
UN peacekeeper
  06/21/26
The universe does not have a "universal" speed lim...
cucumbers
  06/21/26
yes i meant speed of matter as did OP
UN peacekeeper
  06/21/26
We don't know any of this. We haven't even solved all the my...
Bow tie niggas always have very strong opinions
  06/21/26
it's not necessarily expanding into anything
UN peacekeeper
  06/21/26
right that definitely makes sense
icanseemyneurons
  06/21/26
a static universe contradicts literally every astronomical o...
UN peacekeeper
  06/21/26
the solution? The definitely not contradictory proposition, ...
icanseemyneurons
  06/21/26
there is no contradiction. "expansion" just means ...
UN peacekeeper
  06/21/26
Right, there's no contradiction in saying "the glass is...
icanseemyneurons
  06/21/26
well human brain can't actually picture a, say, finite unive...
UN peacekeeper
  06/21/26
Mostly because those are all Insane Copes and God built Man ...
icanseemyneurons
  06/21/26
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Visible_spectrum
a blank bump 4 ya mind
  06/21/26
How does something like the rate at which the Earth travels ...
Bow tie niggas always have very strong opinions
  06/21/26
this is xo, hyperbole is de rigueur
UN peacekeeper
  06/21/26
Seems reddit coded especially with the "literally"...
Bow tie niggas always have very strong opinions
  06/21/26
90% of xo memes come from there
UN peacekeeper
  06/21/26
https://imgbb.com/7dsY8zJn
a blank bump 4 ya mind
  06/21/26
The "speed of light" is actually the universe's sp...
"civilization" could be here, he thought
  06/21/26
ITT: lawyers attempt to discuss physics
AI has never started a F500 company
  06/21/26
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T5x4LJ9d84Y
a blank bump 4 ya mind
  06/21/26
*disproves QM using abelian algebra*
samoth
  06/21/26


Poast new message in this thread



Reply Favorite

Date: June 21st, 2026 12:53 PM
Author: gibberish (?)

Actions that happen faster than the speed of light? We basically know 1% of the universe.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876174&forum_id=2Elisa#49953315)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 21st, 2026 1:11 PM
Author: a blank bump 4 ya mind

https://imgbb.com/gbsqxnHg

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876174&forum_id=2Elisa#49953355)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 21st, 2026 2:00 PM
Author: pizza friend

of course things can move faster

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876174&forum_id=2Elisa#49953432)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 21st, 2026 12:55 PM
Author: Richard Ames

Not a physics expert obviously, but I feel like a lot of the quantum shit is just something our brains aren’t able to comprehend. So the stuff appears mega mysterious, but is likely just far beyond our abilities.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876174&forum_id=2Elisa#49953321)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 21st, 2026 12:56 PM
Author: a blank bump 4 ya mind

what if you could outrun a future reaching to pull you there

using unpredictable chaos & entropymaxxing once you feel it coming

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876174&forum_id=2Elisa#49953324)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 21st, 2026 12:57 PM
Author: Kenneth Play (emotional girth)

same. there must be some sort of connection/relationship that we just haven't discovered yet

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876174&forum_id=2Elisa#49953326)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 21st, 2026 12:59 PM
Author: AI has never started a F500 company

agreed

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876174&forum_id=2Elisa#49953329)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 21st, 2026 1:02 PM
Author: gibberish (?)

How could it possibly be faster than the speed of light?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876174&forum_id=2Elisa#49953335)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 21st, 2026 1:10 PM
Author: AI has never started a F500 company

I don't really think this is right, I think it's more likely far beyond our current understanding of physics, but the one thing I can think of offhand that's consistent with our current ape physics is if it travels through another dimension. I always think of that early-internet flash animation about imagining the 10th dimension

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876174&forum_id=2Elisa#49953352)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 21st, 2026 1:14 PM
Author: Richard Ames

lol dude I have not thought of that in ages. That guy got so brutally shit on by “string theorists”, but his presentation was so intuitive that it felt “right.” Math freaks BTFO’d.

tyft

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876174&forum_id=2Elisa#49953368)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 21st, 2026 1:15 PM
Author: AI has never started a F500 company

lol so was it wrong or ???

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876174&forum_id=2Elisa#49953372)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 21st, 2026 1:20 PM
Author: Richard Ames

“String theorists” basically said that the math showed 10 dimensions (sometimes way more), but that we cannot comprehend the dimensions because they are actually super duper tiny and curled up.

What’s funny to me is that their description just sounds like 3 dimensions, but super small. Whereas the guy you are referencing actually presented something coherent and elegant.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876174&forum_id=2Elisa#49953383)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 21st, 2026 1:22 PM
Author: AI has never started a F500 company

it seems like a lot of the time, different subfields or theories model things differently and "academics" get so stuck in their own little worlds that they don't realize that the models are not only compatible, not only useful in analyzing each other, but also ultimately collapse to the same thing in some sense

(that is, if they're correct in the first place)

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876174&forum_id=2Elisa#49953385)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 21st, 2026 1:39 PM
Author: a blank bump 4 ya mind

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fourth,_fifth,_and_sixth_derivatives_of_position

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876174&forum_id=2Elisa#49953402)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 21st, 2026 1:03 PM
Author: Richard Ames

I watched some guy on YT a while back who was talking about a new theory to explain this which involves the idea that information basically exists outside of time (or something to that effect.) I will try and find it at some point because it was intriguing.

I get the general sense that “time” isn’t really a real thing and that the fields that underly everything can carry and hold information in ways our minds cannot comprehend.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876174&forum_id=2Elisa#49953338)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 21st, 2026 1:06 PM
Author: AI has never started a F500 company

this is similar to how Tom Campbell described remote viewing, astral projection, etc. - like you're tapping into some additional data stream.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876174&forum_id=2Elisa#49953344)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 21st, 2026 1:06 PM
Author: Kenneth Play (emotional girth)

if you had perfect information about the laws of nature, and all the matter in the universe, you could solve for where everything would be at any moment in time, right? not sure if that's what you're saying or not, but that's how i see it

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876174&forum_id=2Elisa#49953345)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 21st, 2026 1:13 PM
Author: Richard Ames

I think it’s more fundamental. But I will have to dig up the video at some point.

Somewhat related, I recently read someone argue that basically all life stems from the electromagnetic field. Meaning that life itself is simply the electromagnetic field operating across matter. I am oversimplifying, but it was intriguing.

I have thought a lot that God basically reveals the Truth to us in whatever capacity we are capable of understanding. And as our tools improve, we are shown the Truth in a clearer light. But we sometimes get arrogant and think we know it all. When in fact we know only what God shows us at a point in time given the tools we have.

::ends sermon::

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876174&forum_id=2Elisa#49953362)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 21st, 2026 4:02 PM
Author: Kenneth Play (emotional girth)



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876174&forum_id=2Elisa#49953613)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 21st, 2026 1:00 PM
Author: gibberish (?)

How does the electron immediately switch polarity thousands of miles away? That makes zero sense. A photon can't travel that fast. Sim error.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876174&forum_id=2Elisa#49953334)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 21st, 2026 1:07 PM
Author: Bow tie niggas always have very strong opinions

It defies our human intuition and how we view the world. We can understand it and apply quantum science, but I don't think anyone "comprehends" it. Like knowing how a women thinks but knowing you will never "comprehend" it.

Time and existence either began at some point and there was nothing before it, or it's always existed and there was no beginning. I dont think anyone can really comprehend either of those even though one has to be true.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876174&forum_id=2Elisa#49953347)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 21st, 2026 1:11 PM
Author: a blank bump 4 ya mind

https://imgbb.com/ds7CbRJg

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876174&forum_id=2Elisa#49953356)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 21st, 2026 1:15 PM
Author: Richard Ames

lol tyft

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876174&forum_id=2Elisa#49953373)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 21st, 2026 12:55 PM
Author: a blank bump 4 ya mind

arrogant to assume we know 1%

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876174&forum_id=2Elisa#49953322)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 21st, 2026 12:58 PM
Author: gibberish (?)

Fair

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876174&forum_id=2Elisa#49953327)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 21st, 2026 12:59 PM
Author: icanseemyneurons

it just looks like magic because we're stupid

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876174&forum_id=2Elisa#49953330)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 21st, 2026 1:12 PM
Author: a blank bump 4 ya mind

https://imgbb.com/q4HJkCy

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876174&forum_id=2Elisa#49953358)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 21st, 2026 12:59 PM
Author: Kenneth Play (emotional girth)

also to add, we know basically zero about the universe. there are way more stars in the universe than there are grains of sand on the earth. our sun, n=1. and most stars have planets orbiting them

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876174&forum_id=2Elisa#49953331)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 21st, 2026 1:00 PM
Author: a blank bump 4 ya mind

this assumes what we see through our eyes constitutes the physical objective reality

it's possible we are traversing bent up geometry on the regular

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876174&forum_id=2Elisa#49953333)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 21st, 2026 1:02 PM
Author: TurboGrafx-67

Is that true about planets? How could we know this?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876174&forum_id=2Elisa#49953337)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 21st, 2026 1:08 PM
Author: state your IQ before I engage you further

Because the jewscope zoomed in on a section of space with 1000 flickers of light per millimeter and even though the resolution was dogshit they enhanced it, did an artist's rendering, and said all those flickers are planets passing in front of stars. And that's just one small section of the sky

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876174&forum_id=2Elisa#49953348)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 21st, 2026 1:18 PM
Author: Richard Ames

It’s all fucking Bryce 3D. I watched some video that was showing the raw footage from a telescope before it gets “enhanced,” and it’s basically just blank.

It reminds me of the “footage” of the hexagon on Saturn. This to me is a bit of a “space is fake” red pill. Given that Jews have had some weird Saturn cube worship shit long before we had space rockets and telescopes. So either they had some foreknowledge of a cube on Saturn or they just make it all up.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876174&forum_id=2Elisa#49953380)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 21st, 2026 2:33 PM
Author: The Penis

Yeah but that's just how instruments/sensors work in the sciences. GC-MS, NMR, electron microscopes and whatever else aren't giving you beautiful renderings of atoms, ions, or energy gradients or whatever. It's a bunch of janky signal and the underlying structure gets inferred. I think it seems misleading, because telescopes originally were a tube you looked through and saw an enlarged version of something you'd see with the bare eyeball.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876174&forum_id=2Elisa#49953480)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 21st, 2026 1:08 PM
Author: Kenneth Play (emotional girth)

oh i don't pretend to be an expert here, i rely on what the astronomers say. there is some extrapolation/assumption https://www.space.com/26078-how-many-stars-are-there.html

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876174&forum_id=2Elisa#49953349)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 21st, 2026 1:12 PM
Author: a blank bump 4 ya mind

https://imgbb.com/Wpxf16dS

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876174&forum_id=2Elisa#49953360)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 21st, 2026 1:09 PM
Author: cucumbers

This is merely a failure/inadequacy of the quantum mechanical model. Also, the speed of light is not an absolute limit for everything; most of the universe is expanding from other parts of the universe faster than the speed of light.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876174&forum_id=2Elisa#49953351)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 21st, 2026 1:12 PM
Author: a blank bump 4 ya mind

https://imgbb.com/TB55V039

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876174&forum_id=2Elisa#49953361)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 21st, 2026 1:15 PM
Author: cucumbers

Cr

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876174&forum_id=2Elisa#49953371)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 21st, 2026 1:15 PM
Author: Richard Ames

Pants are tightening!!!!!

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876174&forum_id=2Elisa#49953375)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 21st, 2026 1:18 PM
Author: UN peacekeeper

1. That is not what quantum entanglement is

2. Why do you think that it’s stranger for the universe not to have a maximum universal speed limit? That was a revolutionary idea

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876174&forum_id=2Elisa#49953379)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 21st, 2026 1:20 PM
Author: cucumbers

The universe does not have a "universal" speed limit. At long enough distances, space is expanding faster than the speed of light. Most of the universe is expanding faster than the speed of light with no known limit.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876174&forum_id=2Elisa#49953384)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 21st, 2026 1:25 PM
Author: UN peacekeeper

yes i meant speed of matter as did OP

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876174&forum_id=2Elisa#49953387)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 21st, 2026 1:26 PM
Author: Bow tie niggas always have very strong opinions

We don't know any of this. We haven't even solved all the mysteries of the human body. To think we know anything about how or if the universe is expanding (into what?), much less at the speed that happens, is hubris.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876174&forum_id=2Elisa#49953388)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 21st, 2026 1:30 PM
Author: UN peacekeeper

it's not necessarily expanding into anything

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876174&forum_id=2Elisa#49953390)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 21st, 2026 1:35 PM
Author: icanseemyneurons

right that definitely makes sense

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876174&forum_id=2Elisa#49953395)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 21st, 2026 1:37 PM
Author: UN peacekeeper

a static universe contradicts literally every astronomical observation

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876174&forum_id=2Elisa#49953399)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 21st, 2026 1:39 PM
Author: icanseemyneurons

the solution? The definitely not contradictory proposition, "it's not expanding into anything."

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876174&forum_id=2Elisa#49953401)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 21st, 2026 1:44 PM
Author: UN peacekeeper

there is no contradiction. "expansion" just means exactly what we find by measurement: every star or other body is getting farther and farther apart from every other one.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876174&forum_id=2Elisa#49953405)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 21st, 2026 1:53 PM
Author: icanseemyneurons

Right, there's no contradiction in saying "the glass is not expanding INTO anything, idiot."

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876174&forum_id=2Elisa#49953415)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 21st, 2026 2:00 PM
Author: UN peacekeeper

well human brain can't actually picture a, say, finite universe that's curved in on itself without being situated inside an extra dimension but it's mathematically possible. but if the universe is an infinite expance even humans can picture the expansion

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876174&forum_id=2Elisa#49953430)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 21st, 2026 2:02 PM
Author: icanseemyneurons

Mostly because those are all Insane Copes and God built Man to biologically resist Insane Copes

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876174&forum_id=2Elisa#49953436)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 21st, 2026 1:40 PM
Author: a blank bump 4 ya mind

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Visible_spectrum

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876174&forum_id=2Elisa#49953403)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 21st, 2026 1:50 PM
Author: Bow tie niggas always have very strong opinions

How does something like the rate at which the Earth travels around the sun contradict whether the universe is expanding? And then why did Einstein think it was static?

"contradicts literally every astronomical observation" strikes me as an embellishment someone who doesn't know what they're talking about says to seem authoritative.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876174&forum_id=2Elisa#49953408)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 21st, 2026 1:52 PM
Author: UN peacekeeper

this is xo, hyperbole is de rigueur

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876174&forum_id=2Elisa#49953414)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 21st, 2026 1:56 PM
Author: Bow tie niggas always have very strong opinions

Seems reddit coded especially with the "literally" in there

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876174&forum_id=2Elisa#49953418)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 21st, 2026 2:00 PM
Author: UN peacekeeper

90% of xo memes come from there

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876174&forum_id=2Elisa#49953434)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 21st, 2026 1:33 PM
Author: a blank bump 4 ya mind

https://imgbb.com/7dsY8zJn

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876174&forum_id=2Elisa#49953394)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 21st, 2026 1:53 PM
Author: "civilization" could be here, he thought

The "speed of light" is actually the universe's speed of causality and quantum entanglement/"spooky action at a distance" doesn't violate this speed of causality

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876174&forum_id=2Elisa#49953416)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 21st, 2026 1:57 PM
Author: AI has never started a F500 company

ITT: lawyers attempt to discuss physics

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876174&forum_id=2Elisa#49953419)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 21st, 2026 1:59 PM
Author: a blank bump 4 ya mind

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T5x4LJ9d84Y

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876174&forum_id=2Elisa#49953427)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 21st, 2026 2:58 PM
Author: samoth

*disproves QM using abelian algebra*

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876174&forum_id=2Elisa#49953518)