Trump admin filed reply brief in birthright citizenship case
| blackpiller | 03/21/26 | | blackpiller | 03/21/26 | | Taylor Swift is not a hobby she is a lifestyle | 03/23/26 | | AZNgirl not letting AZNmen enter Website | 03/23/26 | | Fucking Fuckface | 03/23/26 | | peeface | 03/23/26 | | Leftism is a mental disease | 03/23/26 | | blackpiller | 03/21/26 | | blackpiller | 03/23/26 | | Forced Bi Cuckold of Hormuz | 03/23/26 | | AZNgirl not letting AZNmen enter Website | 03/23/26 | | Muscadine wine | 03/23/26 | | community account (not racist) | 03/23/26 | | Fucking Fuckface | 03/23/26 | | sealclubber | 03/23/26 | | ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, | 03/23/26 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: March 21st, 2026 9:37 PM Author: blackpiller
The Trump admin has filed its reply brief in the birthright citizenship case before the Supreme Court. It opens:
The “main object” of the Citizenship Clause was to grant citizenship to freed slaves and their children, whose allegiance to the United States had generally been established through generations of parental domicile. By contrast, aliens who are just passing through the United States, and those who cross our borders illegally, lack ties of allegiance and do not obtain the “priceless and profound gift” of citizenship for their children.
To receive citizenship under the Clause, a person must be both born “in the United States” and “subject to the jurisdiction thereof…” That language grants citizenship to children “completely subject” to the United States’ “political jurisdiction.” Children of temporarily present or illegal aliens do not qualify because their parents are not domiciled in, and thus do not owe the requisite allegiance to, the United States. Temporarily present aliens are by definition not domiciled here, while illegal aliens lack the legal capacity to form such a domicile.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5848419&forum_id=2Elisa#49760537) |
 |
Date: March 23rd, 2026 12:07 PM Author: AZNgirl not letting AZNmen enter Website
rofl wtf is this shit did they have a DOJ MAGA intern write this shit
"allegiance to the United States had generally been established through generations of parental domicile" --- rofl so by this rationale, is ANYONE a furking citizen? everyone at some point had an ancestor who HAD NOT been in the US for generations
and the "domicile" shit ljl if they arent domiciled in US can they be arrested for shoplifting or other crime?
rofl
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5848419&forum_id=2Elisa#49762340) |
Date: March 23rd, 2026 1:26 PM
Author: ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
there is a strong case that Congress can regulate BRC, but i don't see how the POTUS can do it on his own.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5848419&forum_id=2Elisa#49762646) |
|
|