So the Brits ruled India for 200+ years but cldn't CIVILIZE them, is that rite?
| Copper razzle idiot wagecucks | 09/08/25 | | cheese-eating halford | 09/08/25 | | harsh henna potus | 09/08/25 | | Copper razzle idiot wagecucks | 09/08/25 | | poppy hospital macaca | 09/08/25 | | Copper razzle idiot wagecucks | 09/08/25 | | cheese-eating halford | 09/08/25 | | Copper razzle idiot wagecucks | 09/08/25 | | poppy hospital macaca | 09/08/25 | | Bespoke trip theater hissy fit | 09/08/25 | | Copper razzle idiot wagecucks | 09/08/25 | | Electric set | 09/08/25 | | Copper razzle idiot wagecucks | 09/08/25 | | silver razzmatazz kitchen | 09/08/25 | | Copper razzle idiot wagecucks | 09/08/25 | | hairraiser shitlib | 09/08/25 | | avocado concupiscible stead ape | 09/08/25 | | Copper razzle idiot wagecucks | 09/08/25 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: September 8th, 2025 10:45 AM Author: harsh henna potus
I get the sense that aboriginal Indians are extremely resistant to change and very difficult to civilize.
Look at the Sentinalise. Violent and uncivilized. Now understand that every turd you see is 20-80% Sentinalise type abbo. What are you going to do with these people?
Before the British, they were under Islamic occupation. But even they weren't able to clean the shit up. Most Arab countries, even the poor ones, are clean. Even Gaza, pre-genocide, looked a thousand times better than India.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5770916&forum_id=2Elisa#49244960)
|
Date: September 8th, 2025 3:41 PM Author: Bespoke trip theater hissy fit
real talk: former british empire subjects are much more civilized than subjects of other birdshit empires.
aglophile places are way less buckwild than anything else
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5770916&forum_id=2Elisa#49245750) |
|
|